Management of an outsourced satellite phone development project: Sasken’s experience
Although Indian IT industry is well known for its software services business capabilities, product development still eludes the sector. This case illustrates the 5-year journey of Sasken Technologies – a mid-sized communication services company located in India to design, pre-build, test, integrate and certify a complex end-to-end satellite phone for a global satellite communication service provider. Knowing very well the inherent risks and uncertainties associated with such technology-intensive project, the CEO of Sasken signed the contract with the client with immense belief in his team to execute the project successfully. The case highlights the challenges encountered by the project managers of Sasken in acquiring the technology know-how, integrating hardware and software components, managing globally distributed teams, meeting regulatory requirements and mitigating unforeseen risks inherent in such off-shore outsourcing projects.
Keywordsproject risk global satellite communication outsourcing strategy engineering services multi-site projects
- Anandasivam, G., Sivaramakrishnan, K., Krishnan, M. S. and Mukhopadhyay, T. (2003). Contracts in Offshore Software Development: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science, 49(2): 1671–1683.Google Scholar
- Carmel, E. (1999). Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR.Google Scholar
- National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM). (2010). Global ER&D: Accelerating Innovation with Indian Engineering. New Delhi: NASSCOM.Google Scholar
- Ramakrishnan, L., Selvaraj, V. and Sridhar, V. (2011). A primer on project management. [WWW document] http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/a-primer-on-project-management/article2465175.ece (accessed 19 September 2011).
- Sridhar, V. and Vadivelu, S. (2011). Challenges in Developing Products for an Advanced Mobile Market: Sasken’s Experience. Asia Case Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, Case Reference No: 09/459C (2011).Google Scholar