Advertisement

Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 347–357 | Cite as

Between Indians and “cowboys”: the role of ICT in the management of contradictory self-images and the production of carbon credits in the Brazilian Amazon

  • Raoni Rajão
  • Camilla Marcolino
Research Article

Abstract

In this paper, we draw upon Goffman’s symbolic interactionism to analyze the ways in which new users in developing countries have adopted ICT to present and manage contradictory self-images to different groups of the public. In particular, we show that the Acapú, an indigenous group in the Amazon, present themselves through online videos and websites as ideal Indians: innate forest stewards aiming to mitigate climate change and ensure the planet’s environmental sustainability. At the same time, the Acapú are also represented through a complex computer simulation model as destructive “cowboys”: farmers and ranchers who are willing to develop by clearing their forests in the absence of financial compensation. This research shows that these two opposing self-images, while contradictory, are necessary for the implementation of REDD projects (a payment mechanism for reducing greenhouse emissions from deforestation). In order to obtain carbon credits from avoided deforestation, the project relies on the difference between deforestation measurements and high levels of predicted deforestation, which in turn, depend on the presentation of destructive self-images through the use of a complex computer simulation. But to sell these credits on a voluntary carbon market, it is necessary for the Acapú to openly market a self-image through the Internet which is attractive to corporate buyers willing to boost their eco-friendly profile. Based on this analysis, the paper challenges the narrative whereby Southern ICT users are passive receivers of technological black boxes. In contrast, it shows that in some cases these new users may participate in the creation of ICT artifacts to manage the impressions of distant audiences. Furthermore, the paper calls attention to the role of computer simulations and other ICT applications in concealing the paradoxes of neoliberal environmental management practices.

Keywords

computer simulations online media symbolic interactionism impression management black boxes carbon markets REDD 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank CNPq, CAPES, FAPEMIG, NORAD/IPAM and IEAT/UFMG for the financial support provided for this research. This article also greatly benefited from the remarks of Yola Georgiadou and the other researchers present at the 9th International Conference in Interpretive Policy Analysis, and the constructive comments from Sundeep Sahay and the anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Akrich, M. (1992). The Description of Technical Object, in W. Bijker and J. Law (eds.) Shaping Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
  2. Auerbach, C.F. and Silverstein, L.B. (2003). Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Avgerou, C. (2010). Discourses on ICT and Development, Information Technologies and International Development 6(3): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bansal, P. and Clelland, I. (2004). Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment, Academy of Management Journal 47(1): 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansal, P. and Roth, K. (2000). Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness, The Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 717–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrett, M. and Walsham, G. (1999). Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market, Information Systems Research 10(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baym, N.K. and Boyd, D. (2012). Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 56(3): 320–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bond, I., Grieg-Gran, M., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Hazlewood, P., Wunder, S. and Angelsen, A. (2009). Incentives to Sustain Forest Ecosystem Services: Review and Lessons for REDD, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  10. Bunten, A.C. (2010). More Like Ourselves: Indigenous Capitalism Through Tourism, The American Indian Quarterly 34(3): 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (1996). Rise of the Network Society, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Cherlet, J. (2014). Epistemic and Technological Determinism in Development Aid, Science, Technology and Human Values 39(6): 773–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cho, C.H. and Roberts, R.W. (2010). Environmental Reporting on the Internet by America’s Toxic 100: Legitimacy and Self-presentation, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 11(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conklin, B.A. (1997). Body Paint, Feathers, and VCRs: Aesthetics and Authenticity in Amazonian Activism, American Ethnologist 24(4): 711–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1956). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes, N. and Rajão, R. (2011). Competing Institutional Logics and Sustainable Development: The Case of Geographic Information Systems in Brazil’s Amazon Region, Journal of Information Technology for Development 17(1): 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayes, N. and Walsham, G. (2000). Safe Enclaves, Political Enclaves and Knowledge Working, in C. Prichard, R. Hull, M. Chumer and H. Willmott (eds.) Managing Knowledge; Critical Investigations of Work and Learning, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 69–87.Google Scholar
  19. Heeks, R. (2002). Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations, The Information Society 18(1): 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hogan, B. (2010). The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 30(6): 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. James, J. (2004). Reconstruing the Digital Divide from the Perspective of a Large, Poor, Developing Country, Journal of Information Technology 19(3): 172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kintisch, E. (2007). Carbon Emissions: Improved Monitoring of Rainforests Helps Pierce Haze of Deforestation, Science 316(5824): 536–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Laufer, W.S. (2003). Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing, Journal of Business Ethics 43(3): 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leeuw, J.D., Georgiadou, Y., Kerle, Norman, de Gier, A., Inoue, Y., Ferwerda, J.,… Narantuya, D. (2010). The Function of Remote Sensing in Support of Environmental Policy, Remote Sensing 2(7): 1731–1750.Google Scholar
  27. Litt, E. (2012). Knock, Knock. Who’s There? The Imagined Audience, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 56(3): 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lyon, D. (ed.). (2003). Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Moraga, A.C. (2010). AA Sacred Mountain and the Art of “Impression Management”: Analyzing a Mining Company’s Encounter with Indigenous Communities in Atacama, Chile. Mountain Research and Development 30(4): 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moutinho, P., Santilli, M., Schwartzman, S. and Rodrigues, L. (2005). Why Ignore Tropical Deforestation? A Proposal for Including Forest Conservation in the Kyoto Protocol, Unasylva 222(56): 27–30.Google Scholar
  31. Nepstad, D., Soares-Filho, B.S., Merry, F., Lima, A., Moutinho, P., Carter, J., et al. (2009). The End of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, Science 326(5958): 1350–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neu, D., Warsame, H. and Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports, Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(3): 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neyland, D. (2008). Organizational Ethnography, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noir, C. and Walsham, G. (2007). The Great Legitimizer: ICT as Myth and Ceremony in the Indian Healthcare Sector, Information Technology and People 20(4): 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pearson, E. (2009). All the World Wide Web’s a Stage: The Performance of Identity in Online Social Networks, First Monday 14(3). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2162/2127 (accessed 12 Nov 2014).
  37. Pinch, T. (1992). Opening Black Boxes: Science, Technology and Society, Social Studies of Science 22(3): 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Puri, S.K. (2006). Technological Frames of Stakeholders Shaping the SDI Implementation: A Case Study from INDIA, Information Technology for Development 12(4): 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rajão, R. and Georgiadou, Y. (2014). Blame Games in the Amazon: Environmental Crises and the Emergence of a Transparency Regime in Brazil Global Environmental Politics 14(4): 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rajão, R. and Hayes, N. (2009). Conceptions of Control and IT Artifacts: An Institutional Account of the Amazon Rainforest Monitoring System, Journal of Information Technology 24(4): 320–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajão, R. and Vurdubakis, T. (2013). On the Pragmatics of Inscription: Detecting Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, Theory, Culture and Society 30(4): 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sahay, S. and Avgerou, C. (2002). Introducing the Special Issue on Information and Communication Technologies in Developing Countries, The Information Society 18(2): 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sanz-Sanchez, M., Herold, M. and Penman, J. (2013). Conference Report: REDD+ Related Forest Monitoring Remains a Key Issue: A Report Following the Recent UN Climate Conference in Doha, Carbon Management 4(2): 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, G. (2006). Erving Goffman, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thompson, M. (2008). ICT and Development Studies: Towards Development 2.0, Journal of International Development 20(6): 821–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turner, T. (1992). Representing, Resisting, Rethinking: Historical Transformations of Kayapó and Anthropological Consciousness, in G.W. Stocking (ed.) Colonial Situations: Essays on the Contextualization of Ethnographic Knowledge, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  47. van der Hoff, R., Rajão, R., Leroy, P. and Boezeman, D. (2015). The Parallel Materialization of REDD+ Implementation Discourses in Brazil, Forest Policy and Economics 55: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Veber, H. (1992). Why Indians Wear Clothes: Managing Identity Across an Ethnic Boundary, Ethnos 57(1–2): 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. (1999). GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. (2006).Research on Information Systems in Developing Countries: Current Landscape and Future Prospects, Information Technology for Development 12(1): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. World Bank (2012). Information and Communications for Development 2012: Maximizing Mobile, Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zheng, Y. (2009). Different Spaces for E-development: What Can We Learn from the Capability Approach? Information Technology for Development 15(2): 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Production EngineeringFederal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)Belo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations