Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Product placement 2.0: “Do Brands Need Influencers, or Do Influencers Need Brands?”

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An online experiment examined the effects of Instagram posts’ source types and product-placement types on brand attitude and credibility perception. A 2 (source: brand versus Instagram influencer) × 2 (product placement: product-only [explicit product placement] versus influencer-with-product [moderate product placement]) between-subjects factorial experiment (N = 304) tested the effects of the two manipulated factors on source credibility, corporate credibility, and attitude toward brand posts. Two-way ANOVAs indicate a main effect of source types on perceived trustworthiness and interaction effects of product-placement and source types on perceived expertise, corporate credibility, and attitude toward brand posts. Consumers exposed to brand as the source conditions indicated no difference in corporate credibility and brand attitude regardless of product-placement types. In contrast, consumers exposed to Instagram influencer as the source conditions indicated higher corporate credibility and more positive attitude toward brand posts when exposed to the influencer-with-product conditions than when exposed to the product-only conditions. Consumers differently react to product placement on Instagram influencers’ accounts depending on whether the influencers are present versus absent. Consumers react negatively to influencers’ posts when they do not appear with the products they endorse. Parasocial interaction mediates the relationship between product/brand placement types and corporate credibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abidin, C. 2016. Visibility labour: Engaging with Influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia 161(1): 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abidin, C., and E.C. Thompson. 2012. Buymylife. com: Cyber-femininities and commercial intimacy in blogshops. Women’s Studies International Forum 35(6): 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aichner, T., and F. Jabob. 2015. Measuring the degree of corporate social media use. International Journal of Market Research 57(2): 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amos, C., G. Holmes, and D. Strutton. 2008. Exploring the relationship between celebrity endorser effects and advertising effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising 27(2): 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, C., and T. Tuten. 2015. Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychology and Marketing 32(1): 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, S.K., J.A. Karrh, and H. Patwardhan. 2006. Audience response to product placements: An integrative framework and future research agenda. Journal of Advertising 35(3): 115–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besharat, A., and R. Langan. 2013. Towards the formation of consensus in the domain of co-branding: Current findings and future priorities. Journal of Brand Management. 21(2): 112–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocarnea, M.C., and W.J. Brown. 2007. Celebrity-persona parasocial interaction scale. In Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements, ed. R.A. Reynolds, R. Woods, and J.D. Baker, 309–312. Hershey: Idea Group Reference/IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, B. 2017. Why brands are investing more Into influencer marketing in 2017. Econtent Ma. http://www.econtentmag.com/Articles/Column/Screen-Time/Why-Brands-Are-Investing-More-Into-Influencer-Marketing-in-2017-117732.htm. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.

  • Brown, S., R.V. Kozinets, and J.F. Sherry Jr. 2003. Sell me the old, old story: Retromarketing management and the art of brand revival. Journal of Customer Behaviour. 2(2): 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, N.H. 2017. Exploring similarity characteristics, identification, and parasocial interactions in choice of celebrities. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 6(1): 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J.K., J.A. Bonito, B. Bengtsson, C. Cederberg, M. Lundeberg, and L. Allspach. 2000. Interactivity in human–computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior 16(6): 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., T. Kwang, and S.D. Gosling. 2011. Amazon’s mechanical turk: A NEW SOURCE OF inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1): 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C.T., and R.A. Hayes. 2014. The effect of disclosure of third-party influence on an opinion leader’s credibility and electronic word of mouth in two-step flow. Journal of Interactive Advertising 14(1): 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, H.J., and M.A. Morrison. 2008. Consumers’ reliance on product information and recommendations found in UGC. Journal of Interactive Advertising 8(2): 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.M., and N.J. Rifon. 2012. It is a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing 29(9): 639–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S., and H. Cho. 2017. Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing 34(4): 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E.L., and W.J. Tyler. 2016. Examining perceived distance and personal authenticity as mediators of the effects of ghost-tweeting on parasocial interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 19(5): 342–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, E., and C. Barron. 2008. When product placement goes wrong: The effects of program liking and placement prominence. Journal of Advertising 37(1): 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, T., and E. Hoffman. 2014. eWOM and the importance of capturing consumer attention within social media. Journal of Marketing Communications. 20(1–2): 82–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dave, P. 2015. The rise of a fashion “influencer. Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-sidebar-advertising-disrupted-20150117-story.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.

  • Dibble, J.L., T. Hartmann, and S.F. Rosaen. 2016. Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research. 42(1): 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, B.E., and E. Hund. 2015. ‘Having it all’ on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society 1(2): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S.M., H. Li, and J.-H. Lee. 2002. Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising 31(3): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B.Z. 1999. Celebrity endorsement: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Management. 15(4): 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, N.J., J. Phua, J. Lim, and H. Jun. 2017. Disclosing Instagram influencer advertising: The effects of disclosure language on advertising recognition, attitudes, and behavioral intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising 17: 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferchaud, A., J. Grzeslo, S. Orme, and J. LaGroue. 2018. Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Computers in Human Behavior 80: 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, E.L., C.H. Lim, G. Clavio, and P. Walsh. 2012. Why we follow: An examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication. 5(4): 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D.C. 2002. Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology 4(3): 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R.E., B.A. Lafferty, and S.J. Newell. 2000. The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising 29(3): 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P.B., and K.R. Lord. 1998. Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 20(1): 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halonen-Knight, E., and L. Hurmerinta. 2010. Who endorses whom? Meanings transfer in celebrity endorsement. Journal of Product and Brand Management 19(6): 452–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halzack, S. 2016. How social media became a money press for ‘influencers’. The Washington Post. 3 November. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/social-media-influencers-a-marketing-experiment-thats-metastasized-into-a-mini-economy/2016/11/02/bf14e23a-9c5d-11e6-9980-50913d68eacb_story.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.

  • Hansen, S.S., J.K. Lee, and S.-Y. Lee. 2014. Consumer-generated ads on YouTube: Impacts of source credibility and need for cognition on attitudes, interactive behaviors, and eWOM. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 15(3): 254–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. 2017. What is an influencer? Vouge (UK Edition), March. http://www.vogue.co.uk/article/what-is-an-influencer. Accessed 5 June 2018.

  • Hayes, A.F. 2012. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. KS: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A.F. 2016. The process macro for SPSS and SAS. http://www.processmacro.org/index.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.

  • Hayes, R.A., and C.T. Carr. 2015. Does being social matter? Effects of enabled commenting on credibility and brand attitude in social media. Journal of Promotion Management 21(3): 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmig, B., J.-A. Huber, and P. Leeflang. 2007. Explaining behavioural intentions toward co-branded products. Journal of Marketing Management 23(3–4): 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, E. 2013. The new style influencers are digital. Wall Street Journal, 10 September. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-new-style-influencers-are-digital-1378854156. Accessed 17 June 2018.

  • Hwang, Y., and S.-H. Jeong. 2016. This is a sponsored blog post, but all opinions are my own: The effects of sponsorship disclosure on responses to sponsored blog posts. Computers in Human Behavior 62: 528–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, S.-A.A., and J. Phua. 2014. Following celebrities’ tweets about brands: The impact of twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising 43(2): 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, S.V. 2018. Celebrity 2.0 and beyond! Effects of Facebook profile sources on social networking advertising. Computers in Human Behavior 79: 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamins, M.A., M.J. Brand, S.A. Hoeke, and J.C. Moe. 1989. Two-sided versus one-sided celebrity endorsements: The impact on advertising effectiveness and credibility. Journal of Advertising 18(2): 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R.N., and S. Pang. 1973. Effects of human models on perceived product quality. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(2): 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keel, A., and R. Nataraajan. 2012. Celebrity endorsements and beyond: New avenues for celebrity branding. Psychology and Marketing 29(9): 690–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khamis, S., L. Ang, and R. Welling. 2016. Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies 8(2): 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., and S.J. Ahn. 2017. The role of gamification in enhancing intrinsic motivation to use a loyalty program. Journal of Interactive Marketing 40(Supplement C): 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., and S.M. Choi. 2012. Credibility cues in online shopping: an examination of corporate credibility, retailer reputation, and product review credibility. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising 7(3): 217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labrecque, L.I. 2014. Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing 28(2): 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B.A., and R.E. Goldsmith. 1999. Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research 44(2): 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B.A., and R.E. Goldsmith. 2004. How influential are corporate credibility and endorser attractiveness when innovators react to advertisements for a new high-technology product? Corporate Reputation Review 7(1): 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B.A., R.E. Goldsmith, and S.J. Newell. 2002. The dual credibility model: The influence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 10(3): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, S., and K.A. Braun. 2000. I’ll have what she’s having: Gauging the impact of product placements on viewers. Psychology and Marketing 17(12): 1059–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., S.M. Edwards, and J.-H. Lee. 2002. Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: Scale development and validation. Journal of Advertising 31(2): 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C.M., and Y.-K. Kim. 2011. Older consumers’ Tv home shopping: Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and perceived convenience. Psychology & Marketing 28(8): 763–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L.-C., W.-P. Chang, and H.-H. Chang. 2014. Consumer attitudes toward blogger’s sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness. Computers in Human Behavior 34: 258–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacInnis, D.J., C. Moorman, and B.J. Jaworski. 1991. Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. Journal of Marketing 55(4): 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S.B., and R.J. Lutz. 1989. An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing 53(2): 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A.E. 2013a. They’re really profound women, they’re entrepreneurs: Conceptions of authenticity in fashion blogging. Vol. 8, presented at the international AIII conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM).

  • Marwick, A.E. 2013b. Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. 1989. Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research 16(3): 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J.C., P.R. Hamilton, and A.N. Weiner. 1974. The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research 1(1): 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mediakix. 2016. The top Instagram influencers for 2017: A quick list guide. Mediakix|Influencer Marketing Agency. http://mediakix.com/2016/08/top-instagram-influencers-for-2016/#gs.jwdt9x8. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.

  • Mediakix. 2017. Top 10 lifestyle bloggers to know Mediakix|Influencer Marketing Agency . http://mediakix.com/2017/05/top-lifestyle-bloggers-everyone-should-know/#gs.yn7KDI4. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.

  • Miller, F.M. 2015. Ad authenticity: An alternative explanation of advertising’s effect on established brand attitudes. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 36(2): 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F.M., and C.T. Allen. 2012. How does celebrity meaning transfer? Investigating the process of meaning transfer with celebrity affiliates and mature brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22(3): 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S.J., and R.E. Goldsmith. 2001. The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research 52(3): 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian, R. 1990. “Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising 19(3): 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolacci, G., J. Chandler, and P.G. Ipeirotis. 2010. Running experiments on Amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making 5(5): 411–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phua, J., S.V. Jin, and J. Kim. 2017. Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics 34(1): 412–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, D., I. Duraipandian, and D. Sethi. 2014. Celebrity endorsement: How celebrity–brand–user personality congruence affects brand attitude and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications 22(5): 456–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K.J., and A.F. Hayes. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40(3): 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifon, N.J., S.M. Choi, C.S. Trimble, and H. Li. 2004. Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising 33(1): 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R.B., and M.P. McHugh. 1987. Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 31(3): 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C.A. 2002. Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. Journal of Consumer Research 29(3): 306–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C.A., and D. Rasolofoarison. 2017. Uncovering the power of natural endorsements: a comparison with celebrity-endorsed advertising and product placements. International Journal of Advertising 36(5): 761–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seno, D., and B.A. Lukas. 2007. The equity effect of product endorsement by celebrities. European Journal of Marketing 41(1/2): 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spry, A., R. Pappu, and T. Bettina Cornwell. 2011. Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity. European Journal of Marketing 45(6): 882–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista. 2018. Instagram luxury brands followers 2017|Statistic. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/483753/leading-luxury-brands-instagram-followers/. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.

  • Till, B.D. 1998. Using celebrity endorsers effectively: Lessons from associative learning. Journal of Product & Brand Management 7(5): 400–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Till, B.D., and M. Busler. 2000. The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising 29(3): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, C., T.D. Jensen, and L. Carlson. 1994. The effects of multiple product endorsements by celebrities on consumers’ attitudes and intentions. Journal of Consumer Research 20(4): 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W.-H.S., and L.R. Men. 2013. Motivations and antecedents of consumer engagement with brand pages on social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising 13(2): 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutaj, K., and E.A. van Reijmersdal. 2012. Effects of online advertising format and persuasion knowledge on audience reactions. Journal of Marketing Communications 18(1): 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesilind, E. 2017. Agents of change. JCK. https://www.jckonline.com/magazine-article/agents-of-change/. Accessed 7 Feb 2019.

  • Walther, J.B., and M.R. Parks. 2002. Cues filtered out, cues filtered in. Handbook of Interpersonal Communication 3: 529–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, J.H., B.D. Till, and R. Priluck. 2000. Co-branding: brand equity and trial effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing 17(7): 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H.C., and Y. Wang. 2015. Social sharing of online videos: Examining American consumers’ video sharing attitudes, intent, and behavior. Psychology & Marketing 32: 907–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, B. 2016. The growing influence of ‘Influencer’; A social media byword goes back to Chaucer’s Era. Wall Street Journal (Online). https://search-proquest-com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/docview/1784932200.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Sejong University, Neungdong-ro 209, Gunja-dong, Gwangjin-gu, 05006, Seoul, Korea

    S. Venus Jin

  2. Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Michigan State University, Communication Arts and Sciences Building, 404 Wilson Road, Room 309, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Aziz Muqaddam

Authors
  1. S. Venus Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aziz Muqaddam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Venus Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, S.V., Muqaddam, A. Product placement 2.0: “Do Brands Need Influencers, or Do Influencers Need Brands?”. J Brand Manag 26, 522–537 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-019-00151-z

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-019-00151-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation