Advertisement

Journal of Brand Management

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 291–303 | Cite as

Luxury brands pursuing lifestyle positioning: effects on willingness to pay

  • Francesco MassaraEmail author
  • Daniele Porcheddu
  • Robert D. Melara
Original Article
  • 174 Downloads

Abstract

Under the lens of construal level theory (CLT), this paper offers a new perspective on lifestyle advertising practiced by luxury brands clarifying both its value and its limitations. We find that under conditions of high brand familiarity (BF) lifestyle advertising is inconsistent with high-level construals, diminishing consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for the advertised brand. Using a measure of language-induced abstractness, we show that lifestyle advertising is detrimental to WTP when consumers are familiar with the brand (condition involving saliency of low-level construals), but not when they are new to the brand (n = 180). In a follow-up study, we find support for a moderated mediation model in which abstractness mediates the effect of advertising type on WTP, whereas BF moderates the mediation, depressing abstractness when familiarity is high and enhancing it when low. In conclusion, our evidence suggests to managers in the luxury industry that low construal levels are key to using price as a tactical tool in positioning their brands. We conclude with a discussion of implications of these results for luxury brands research and management.

Keywords

Luxury brands Lifestyle advertising Product-centered advertising Abstractness Brand familiarity Willingness to pay 

References

  1. Aaker, D.A., and E. Joachimsthaler. 2000. Brand leadership: The next level of the brand revolution. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bar-Anan, Y., N. Liberman, and Y. Trope. 2006. The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135(4): 609–622.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609.Google Scholar
  3. Belk, R.W. 1989. Extended self and extending paradigmatic perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 16(1): 129–132.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209202.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, J., and C. Heath. 2007. Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research 34(2): 121–134.  https://doi.org/10.1086/519142.Google Scholar
  5. Carnaghi, A., A. Maass, S. Gresta, M. Bianchi, M. Cadinu, and L. Arcuri. 2008. Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94(5): 839–859.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.839.Google Scholar
  6. Chernev, A., R. Hamilton, and D. Gal. 2011. Competing for consumer identity: Limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. Journal of Marketing 75(3): 66–82.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.3.66.Google Scholar
  7. Cian, L., A. Krishna, and N. Schwarz. 2015. Positioning rationality and emotion: Rationality is up and emotion is down. Journal of Consumer Research 42(4): 632–651.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv046.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, R.J. 2014. Brand personification: Introduction and overview. Psychology & Marketing 31(1): 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20671.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, H., S. Schembri, and D. Miller. 2010. Brand-self identity narratives in the James Bond movies. Psychology & Marketing 27(6): 557–567.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20344.Google Scholar
  10. Dawar, N., and J. Lei. 2009. Brand crises: The roles of brand familiarity and crisis relevance in determining the impact on brand evaluations. Journal of Business Research 62(4): 509–516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.02.001.Google Scholar
  11. Dichter, E. 1986. Whose lifestyle is it anyway? Psychology & Marketing 3(3): 151–163.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220030304.Google Scholar
  12. Escalas, J.E., and J.R. Bettman. 2005. Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research 32(3): 378–389.  https://doi.org/10.1086/497549.Google Scholar
  13. Fournier, S. 1998. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 24(4): 343–353.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209515.Google Scholar
  14. Freire, N.A. 2014. When luxury advertising adds the identitary values of luxury: A semiotic analysis. Journal of Business Research 67(12): 2666–2675.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.004.Google Scholar
  15. Fujita, K., M.D. Henderson, J. Eng, Y. Trope, and N. Liberman. 2006. Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science 17(4): 278–282.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01698.x.Google Scholar
  16. Greenwald, A.G., D.E. McGhee, and J.L. Schwartz. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6): 1464–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.Google Scholar
  17. Gutman, J. 1982. A mean-end chain model on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing 46(2): 60–72.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3203341.Google Scholar
  18. Hansen, J., and M. Wänke. 2011. The abstractness of luxury. Journal of Economic Psychology 32(5): 789–796.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.005.Google Scholar
  19. Hayes, A.F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hennigs, N., K.P. Wiedmann, S. Behrens, and C. Klarmann. 2013. Unleashing the power of luxury: Antecedents of luxury brand perception and effects on luxury brand strength. Journal of Brand Management 20(8): 705–715.  https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2013.11.Google Scholar
  21. Hustvedt, G., and J.C. Bernard. 2010. Effects of social responsibility labelling and brand on willingness to pay for apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies 34(6): 619–626.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00870.x.Google Scholar
  22. Kapferer, J.-N. 2012. The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking. London: Kogan Page Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Kapferer, J.-N.M., and P. Valette-Florence. 2018a. The impact of increased brand penetration on luxury desirability: A dual effect. Journal of Brand Management.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0091-7.Google Scholar
  24. Kapferer, J.-N., and P. Valette-Florence. 2018b. The impact of brand penetration and awareness on luxury brand desirability: A cross country analysis of the relevance of the rarity principle. Journal of Business Research 83(1): 38–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.025.Google Scholar
  25. Kardes, F.R., M.L. Cronley, and J. Kim. 2006. Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16(2): 135–144.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1602_4.Google Scholar
  26. Keel, A., and R. Nataraajan. 2012. Celebrity endorsements and beyond: New avenues for celebrity branding. Psychology & Marketing 29(9): 690–703.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20555.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, H., and D.R. John. 2008. Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology 18(2): 116–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2008.01.006.Google Scholar
  28. Kim, J.E., S. Lloyd, and M.C. Cervellon. 2016. Narrative-transportation storylines in luxury brand advertising: Motivating consumer engagement. Journal of Business Research 69(1): 304–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.002.Google Scholar
  29. Kim, K., M. Zhang, and X. Li. 2008. Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 35(4): 706–713.  https://doi.org/10.1086/592131.Google Scholar
  30. König, J.C., K.P. Wiedmann, N. Hennigs, and J. Haase. 2016. The legends of tomorrow: A semiotic approach towards a brand myth of luxury heritage. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 26(2): 198–215.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2016.1143155.Google Scholar
  31. Koschate-Fischer, N., A. Diamantopoulos, and K. Oldenkotte. 2012. Are consumers really willing to pay more for a favorable country image? A study of country-of-origin effects on willingness to pay. Journal of International Marketing 20(1): 19–41.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.10.0140.Google Scholar
  32. Li, G., G. Li, and Z. Kambele. 2012. Luxury fashion brand consumers in China: Perceived value, fashion lifestyle, and willingness to pay. Journal of Business Research 65(10): 1516–1522.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.019.Google Scholar
  33. Liberman, N., and Y. Trope. 1998. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(1): 5–18.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5.Google Scholar
  34. Massara, F., and F. Severino. 2013. Psychological distance in the heritage experience. Annals of Tourism Research 42: 108–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.01.005.Google Scholar
  35. Mitra, A., and J. Lynch. 1995. Toward a reconciliation of market power and information theories of advertising effects on price elasticity. Journal of Consumer Research 21(4): 644–659.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209425.Google Scholar
  36. Netemeyer, R.G., B. Krishnan, C. Pullig, G. Wang, M. Yagci, D. Dean, J. Ricks, and F. Wirth. 2004. Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity. Journal of Business Research 57(2): 209–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00303-4.Google Scholar
  37. O’Connor, C. 2013. Apple’s hire of Burberry’s Angela Ahrendts shows its future is in lifestyle, not tech. Forbes, October 15. http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2013/10/15/apples-hire-of-burberrys-angela-ahrendts-shows-its-future-is-in-lifestyle-not-tech/. Last access 21 June 2017.
  38. Quinn, K.A., M.F. Mason, and C.N. Macrae. 2009. Familiarity and person construal: Individuating knowledge moderates the automaticity of category activation. European Journal of Social Psychology 39(5): 852–861.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.596.Google Scholar
  39. Rao, A.R., and K.B. Monroe. 1988. The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 15(2): 253–264.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209162.Google Scholar
  40. Semin, G.R., and K. Fiedler. 1988. The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing person: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(4): 558–568.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558.Google Scholar
  41. Simonson, I., and A. Drolet. 2004. Anchoring effects on consumers’ willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept. Journal of Consumer Research 31(3): 681–690.  https://doi.org/10.1086/425103.Google Scholar
  42. Spencer, S.J., M.P. Zanna, and G.T. Fong. 2005. Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(6): 845–851.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845.Google Scholar
  43. Trope, Y., N. Liberman, and C. Wakslak. 2007. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17(2): 83–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X.Google Scholar
  44. van Doorn, J., and P.C. Verhoef. 2011. Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods. International Journal of Research in Marketing 28(3): 167–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.02.005.Google Scholar
  45. Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance 16(1): 8–37.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x.Google Scholar
  46. Weil, J. 2015. Johnny Depp to front Dior scent. WWD, June 3. http://wwd.com/beauty-industry-news/fragrance/johnny-depp-dior-fragrance-10139875/. Last access 21 June 2017.
  47. Wertenbroch, K., and B. Skiera. 2002. Measuring consumers’ willingness to pay at the point of purchase. Journal of Marketing Research 39(2): 228–241.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.2.228.19086.Google Scholar
  48. Wu, M.-S.S., C.-H.S. Chen, and B. Nguyen. 2015. Luxury brand purchases and the extended self. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration 73(3): 153–173.  https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2015-0046.Google Scholar
  49. Zeithaml, V. 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 52(3): 2–22.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Massara
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Daniele Porcheddu
    • 3
  • Robert D. Melara
    • 4
  1. 1.IULM UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.Toulouse Business SchoolUniversity of ToulouseToulouseFrance
  3. 3.Department of Economics and BusinessUniversity of SassariSassariItaly
  4. 4.Department of Psychology, City CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations