Skip to main content
Log in

The communication of Corporate–NGO Partnerships: analysis of Sainsbury’s collaboration with Comic Relief

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on CSR communication using the example of Corporate–NGO partnership between British supermarket chain Sainsbury’s and Comic Relief. Questionnaires were distributed to 40 participants asking them about their consumer behaviour and opinion on partnerships. Using thematic analysis, two main themes have been identified in the data set: some consumers are sceptical towards cross-sector partnerships because they assume selfish reasons behind the collaboration and view them as corporate PR tool. On the other hand, the majority of consumers evaluate Corporate–NGO Partnerships as appropriate and a gain for society at large. The analysis showed that Sainsbury’s customers know about the partnership with Comic Relief while non-customers lack awareness and that the most successful means of communication of partnerships is the supermarket promotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: C&E Corporate-NGO Partnerships Barometer (2014, p. 22)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Due to the word count, we cannot present coding process. However, full tables explaining the coding process are available upon request.

References

  • Albareda, L., J. Lozano, A. Tencati, A. Midttun, and F. Perrini. 2008. The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review 17(4): 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenas, D., J.M. Lozano, and L. Albareda. 2009. The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics 88(1): 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya, B., and J. Salk. 2006. Cross sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly 16(2): 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendell, J., E. Collins, and J. Roper. 2010. Beyond partnerism: Toward a more expansive research agenda on multi-stakeholder collaboration for responsible business. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(6): 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S. 2011. Ethics and public relations—Institute for Public Relations. Institute for Public Relations, http://www.instituteforpr.org/ethics-and-public-relations/. Accessed 18 August 2015.

  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., and S. Wilkinson. 2003. Liability or asset? Women talk about the vagina. Psychology of Women Section Review 5(2): 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brønn, P.S., and A.B. Vrioni. 2001. Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising 20(2): 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., and E. Bell. 2011. Business research methods, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4): 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C&E. 2014. C&E Corporate-NGO Partnership Barometer 2014. http://www.candeadvisory.com/sites/default/files/C&E_Corporate_NGO_Partnerships_Barometer_2014_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2015.

  • Comic Relief. 2015. Comic Relief. http://www.comicrelief.com/. Accessed 8 July 2015.

  • Cornelissen, J. 2014. Corporate Communication. A Guide to Theory and Practice (4th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. 2014. Public views on ethical retail. Research Series No. 177. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/322624/Public-views-on-ethical-retail.pdf. ACcessed 6 July 2015.

  • Eid, N., and A. Sabella. 2014. A fresh approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR): Partnerships between businesses and non-profit sectors. Corporate Governance 14(3): 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. 2001. Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. Perspectives in Business Ethics 3: 38-48. http://academic.udayton.edu/LawrenceUlrich/Stakeholder%20Theory.pdf. Accessed 9 April 2015.

  • Freeman, R. E., and J. McVea, 2001. A stakeholder approach to strategic management. Working paper No. 01-02, Darden Graduate School of Business Administration. http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=263511. Accessed 12 December 2014.

  • Freeman, R.E., J.S. Harrison, A.C. Wicks, B.L. Parmar, and S. De Colle. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Golob, U., and J.L. Bartlett. 2007. Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review 33(1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob, U., M. Lah, and Z. Jančič. 2008. Value orientations and consumer expectations of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications 14(2): 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., M. Stierl, and T. Bornemann. 2013. Corporate social responsibility in business-to-business markets: How organizational customers account for supplier corporate social responsibility engagement. Journal of Marketing 77(6): 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illia, L., and J.M.T. Balmer. 2012. Corporate communication and corporate marketing. Corporate Communications 17(4): 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., and T. Keshishian. 2009. Uneasy alliances: Lessons learned from partnerships between businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics 84(2): 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, T.S., and A.E. Nielsen. 2011. Strategic stakeholder dialogues: A discursive perspective on relationship building. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 16(3): 204–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. 2014. Strategic communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Effects of stated motives and corporate reputation on stakeholder responses. Public Relations Review 40(5): 838–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, M.A., T.R. Kuhn, and M.D. Pfarrer. 2012. A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review 37(3): 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapadat, J. 2010. Thematic analysis. In Encyclopedia of case study research, ed. A.J. Mills, G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe, 926–928. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, R.D., E.S. Weiss, and R. Miller. 2001. Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Quarterly 79(2): 179–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen, B.D., and K.J. Perks. 2015. The influence of interactive, non-interactive, implicit and explicit CSR communication on young adults’ perception of UK supermarkets’ corporate brand image and reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 20(2): 178–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, T., and A. Garrido. 2012. Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 19(1): 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintel. 2014a. Food and drink retailing-UK-March 2014. http://academic.mintel.com/display/679718/. Accessed 5 July 2015.

  • Mintel. 2014b. Supermarkets: More than just food retailing-UK-November 2014. http://academic.mintel.com/display/6796333. Accessed 8 July 2015.

  • Mintel. 2014c. Seasonal shopping-UK-August 2014. http://academic.mintel.com/display/687420/. Accessed 8 July 2015.

  • Molina-Gallart, N. 2014. Strange bedfellows? NGO–corporate relations in international development: An NGO perspective. Development Studies Research: An Open Access Journal 1(1): 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., and M. Schultz. 2006. Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4): 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., M. Schultz, and K.U. Nielsen. 2008. The ‘Catch 22′ of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications 14(2): 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Never, B. 2011. Understanding constraints on nonprofit leadership tactics in times of recession. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(6): 990–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A.E., and C. Thomsen. 2007. Reporting CSR—What and how to say it? Corporate Communications: An International Journal 12(1): 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A.E., and C. Thomsen. 2009. CSR communication in small and medium-sized enterprises. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 14(2): 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E.R. 2006. Making corporate social responsibility (CSR) operable: How companies translate stakeholder dialogue into practice. Business and Society Review 111(2): 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, G.E., and J. Pedersen. 2013. The rise of business-NGO partnerships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 50(1): 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podnar, K. 2008. Guest editorial: Communicating corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications 14(2): 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizk, R., D. Marx, M. Schrepfer, J. Zimmerman, and O. Guenther. 2009. Media coverage of online social network privacy issues in Germany: A thematic analysis. In AMCIS 2009 Proceedings. Paper 342. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2009/342. Accessed 14 July 2015.

  • Sainsbury’s. 2015a. J Sainsbury plc Corporate Site. http://www.j-sainsbury.co.uk/. Accessed 8 July 2015.

  • Sainsbury’s. 2015b. J Sainsbury plc Corporate Site. Search Comic Relief. http://www.jsainsbury.co.uk/extras/search/?keyword=comic+relief#form_articlessearchfilter. Accessed 10 July 2015.

  • Sainsbury’s. 2015c. Facebook Sainsbury’s, shopping and retail. https://www.facebook.com/sainsburys/. Accessed 10 July 2015.

  • Sainsbury’s. 2015d. Twitter @sainsburys. https://twitter.com/sainsburys. Accessed 10 July 2015.

  • Sainsbury’s. 2015e. YouTube Sainsbury’s. https://www.youtube.com/user/Sainsburys. Accessed 10 July 2015.

  • Samii, R., L.N. Van Wassenhove, and S. Bhattacharya. 2002. An innovative public private partnership: New approach to development. World Development 30(6): 991–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanzo, M.S., L.I. Álvarez, M. Rey, and N. Garcí. 2015. Business-nonprofit partnerships: Do their effects extend beyond the charitable donor-recipient model? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 44(2): 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schramm-Klein, H., D. Morschett, and B. Swoboda. 2015. Retailer corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 43(4/5): 403–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J.W., and B. Parker. 2005. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management 31(6): 849–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S.P. 1977. Advocacy advertising and large corporations. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D., and C.N. Leonidou. 2013. When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR scepticism. Journal of Business Research 66(10): 1831–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista. 2015. Market share of grocery stores in Great Britain for the 12 weeks ending March 29, 2015. http://www.statista.com/statistics/279900/grocery-market-share-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/. Accessed 9 July 2015.

  • Tata, J., and S. Prasad. 2014. CSR communication: An impression management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 132: 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tench, R., and M. Topic. 2017. Evaluating CSR, sustainability and sourcing within the UK supermarket industry: The case of Waitrose/John Lewis partnership. In CSR, Sustainability and Leadership, ed. G. Eweje and R. Bathurst. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tench, R., W. Sun, and B. Jones. 2014. Introduction: CSR communication as an emerging field of study. In Communicating corporate social responsibility: Perspectives and practice, vol. 6, ed. R. Tench, W. Sun, and B. Jones, 3–21., Critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability Emerald: Bingley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tulder, R., M.M. Seitanidi, A. Crane, and S. Brammer. 2016. Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Four impact loops for channeling partnership studies. Journal of Business Ethics 135: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuškej, U., U. Golob, and K. Podnar. 2013. The role of consumer-brand identification in building brand relationships. Journal of Business Research 66(1): 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, B.L. 2014. Corporate social responsibility Communication: Towards a phase model of strategic planning. In Communicating corporate social responsibility: Perspectives and practice, vol. 6, ed. R. Tench, W. Sun, and B. Jones, 59–80., Critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability Emerald: Bingley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Topić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rohwer, L., Topić, M. The communication of Corporate–NGO Partnerships: analysis of Sainsbury’s collaboration with Comic Relief. J Brand Manag 26, 35–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0111-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0111-7

Keywords

Navigation