Introducing multi-dimensional brand architecture: taking structure, market orientation and stakeholder alignment into account
- 148 Downloads
Traditional research in brand architecture has primarily focused on bipolar, structural models describing brand constellations viewed from the brand owner’s angle of incidence. This paper further extends previous theorization within strategic brand management by offering the Conceptual Integrated Multi-dimensional Architecture (CIMA) model as an incorporation of existing research in brand architecture, arranged according to hierarchical structure, degree of collaboration with third parties and alignment with consumer perceptions. Traditional brand architecture is broadened using two additional dimensions—the level of intercompany partnerships and perceptional congruency between stakeholders—to produce a model that distinguishes between open and closed brand structures and includes the consumers’ perceptions as a mediator of brand strategy efficiency. The CIMA model implies that strategic brand management should consider the possible effects of third-party collaboration, in conjunction with consumer beliefs, on the efficiency of the pursued brand strategy and selected go-to-market approach. By including these two additional dimensions, marketing executives may find a more nuanced view of the potential challenges and obstacles that stand in the way of successful brand strategy execution. The paper is concluded by discussing the implications of this conceptual model and suggests a number of future research directions for brand architecture and brand portfolio management.
KeywordsBrand architecture Brand portfolio Customer perception CIMA Stakeholder alignment
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Aaker, D. 2004. Brand portfolio strategy: creating relevance, differentiation, energy, leverage and clarity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Aaker, D. 2011. Brand Relevance: making competitors irrelevant. USA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.Google Scholar
- Aaker, D. and Joachimsthaler, E. (2000) the brand relationship spectrum: The key to the brand architecture challenge. California Management Review.Google Scholar
- Åsberg, P. 2009. The brand relationship cycle: Incorporating co-branding into brand architecture. IUP Journal of Brand Management 6(2): 45–53.Google Scholar
- Apple Inc. (2018) Q4 2017 unaudited summary data. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/pdfs/fy17-q4/Q4FY17DataSummary.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2018.
- Blackett, T., and B. Boad. 1998. Co-branding the science of alliance. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Carolino Sousa Santos Jr., E. 2018. Brand portfolio strategy and brand architecture: A comparative study. Cogent Business & Management 5(1): 1483465.Google Scholar
- Ferrari, N.V. (2016). Annual report 2016. http://corporate.ferrari.com/sites/ferrari15ipo/files/2016_12_31_-_ferrari_nv_annual_report_0.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2018.
- Han, J., Chung, S., and Sohn, Y. (2018) What’s in a name? The impact of subcategory salience on value perception and upgrade intention for multicategory products. Psychology & Marketing, pp 1–10.Google Scholar
- Hill, S., R. Ettenson, and D. Tyson. 2005. Achieving the ideal brand portfolio. MIT Sloan Management Review 46(2): 85–90.Google Scholar
- Hill, S., and C. Lederer. 2001. The infinite asset—Managing brands to build new assets. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
- Intel Corporation (2016) Annual Report 2016. http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReports/PDF/NASDAQ_INTC_2016.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2018.
- Joiner, C. 1998. Concept mapping in marketing: A research tool for uncovering consumers’ knowledge structure associations. Advances in Consumer Research 25: 311–317.Google Scholar
- Kapferer, J.N. 1997. Strategic brand management. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Kapferer, J.N. 2004. The new strategic brand management. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Keller, K.L. 2003. Strategic brand management, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Kumar, N. 2003. Kill a brand, keep a customer. Harvard Business Review 81(12): 86–95.Google Scholar
- Laforet, S., and J. Saunders. 1994. Managing brand portfolios: How the leaders do It. Journal of Advertising Research 34(5): 64–76.Google Scholar
- Olins, W. 1989. Corporate identity. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.Google Scholar
- Oswald, L. 2014. Marketing and semiotics, signs, strategies and brand value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Oswald, L. (2007) Semiotics and strategic brand management. http://www.csun.edu/~bashforth/098_PDF/Semiotic_branding.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2018.
- Rao, A.R., and R.W. Rueckert. 1994. Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Review 36(1): 87–97.Google Scholar
- Sachgau, M. (2018) Porsche’s pivot toward the family pays off. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-15/porsche-s-pivot-toward-the-family-pays-off. Accessed 16 Mar 2018.
- Sjodin, H. (2005) Dirt!: An interpretive study of negative opinions about a brand extension, in E—European advances in consumer research (eds. Karin M. Ekstrom and Helene Brembeck), Association for consumer research, Vol. 7 92–96.Google Scholar
- Strebinger, A. 2004. Strategic brand concept and brand architecture strategy: A proposed model. Advances in Consumer Research 31: 656–661.Google Scholar