Skip to main content

20 Years of brand personality: a bibliometric review and research agenda

Abstract

This article aims to deconstruct 20 years of research on brand personality by systematically reviewing the extant literature and identifying relevant research gaps. The current status of brand personality research is analyzed by applying bibliometric co-citation meta-analysis. This interdisciplinary review includes 220 articles in 62 journals from the ISI Web of Science. A total of 8108 citations were used to discuss key contributions, underlying research streams, journal outlets and to point out future directions of the field. Based on the citation map, five research clusters within brand personality literature were identified: Measurement of Brand Personality; Direct and Indirect Effects of Brand Personality; Dynamics of Brand Personality Dimensions; Brand Personality in Brand Extensions; and Application of Brand Personality to Related Areas. Furthermore, a set of research questions is proposed to be considered for future research. Thus, the study provides a relevant interdisciplinary platform on brand personality research for academics and practitioners and stimulates the development of further knowledge on this topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Source: ISI Web of Science

Fig. 2

References

  • Aaker, D.A. 1996. Building strong brands. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. 1999. The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research 34: 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J., and S. Fournier. 1995. Brand as a character, a partner and a person: Three perspectives on the question of brand personality. Advances in Consumer Research 22: 391–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J., S. Fournier, and S.A. Brasel. 2004. When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research 31(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J.L. 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34(3): 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J.L., V. Benet-Martinez, and J. Garolera. 2001. Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(3): 492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, A., and K. Thyagaraj. 2014. Brand personality and brand equity research: Past developments and future directions. IUP Journal of Brand Management 11(3): 19–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S.H., and E.A.C. Lim. 2006. The influence of metaphors and product type on brand personality perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Advertising 35(2): 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Business Schools. (2015). ABS academic journal guide 2015, London. https://steffenroth.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/abs-2015-steffen-roth-ch.pdf. Accessed June 2016.

  • Austin, J.R., J.A. Siguaw, and A.S. Mattila. 2003. A re-examination of the generalizability of the Aaker brand personality measurement framework. Journal of Strategic Marketing 11(2): 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avis, M., R. Aitken, and S. Ferguson. 2012. Brand relationship and personality theory: Metaphor or consumer perceptual reality? Marketing Theory 12(3): 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, A., and J.-N. Kapferer. 2003. Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? Journal of Brand Management 11(2): 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., P. Lenk, and M. Wedel. 2010. Brand extension strategy planning: Empirical estimation of brand-category personality fit and atypicality. Journal of Marketing Research 47(2): 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15: 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A.M., and R.P. Hill. 2012. The universality of warmth and competence: A response to brands as intentional agents. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22(2): 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackston, M. 1993. Beyond brand personality: Building brand relationships. In Brand equity and advertising: Advertising’s role in building strong brands, ed. D.A. Aaker, and A.L. Biel, 113–124. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C.L., and J. Furner. 2002. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36(1): 2–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosnjak, M., and V. Bochmann. 2007. Dimensions of brand personality attributions: A person-centric approach in the German cultural context. Social Behavior and Personality 35(3): 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brakus, J.J., B.H. Schmitt, and L. Zarantonello. 2009. Brand experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of Marketing 73(3): 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capelli, S., and A. Jolibert. 2009. Metaphor’s validity in marketing research. Psychology & Marketing 26(12): 1079–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G.V., C. Barbaranelli, and G. Guido. 2001. Brand personality: How to make the metaphor fit? Journal of Economic Psychology 22(3): 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, P.L., and M.H. Chieng. 2006. Building consumer-brand relationship: A cross-cultural experiential view. Psychology & Marketing 23(11): 927–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L., and F. Dall’Olmo Riley. 1998. Defining a “brand”: Beyond the literature with experts’ interpretations. Journal of Marketing Management 14(5): 417–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., G. Smith, and I. Grime. 2005. The impact of brand extensions on brand personality: Experimental evidence. European Journal of Marketing 39(1–2): 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J.M. 1990. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology 41: 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M., and N. Stokburger-Sauer. 2013a. Brand personality: A meta-analytic review of antecedents and consequences. Marketing Letters 24(3): 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M., and N.E. Stokburger-Sauer. 2013b. Measurement characteristics of Aaker’s brand personality dimensions: Lessons to be learned from human personality research. Psychology & Marketing 30(11): 950–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J.E., and J.R. Bettman. 2003. You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(3): 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J.E., and J.R. Bettman. 2005. Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research 32(3): 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B., and J.A. Russell. 1991. The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60(3): 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetscherin, M., and D. Heinrich. 2015. Consumer brand relationships research: A bibliometric citation meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research 68: 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetscherin, M., and J.C. Usunier. 2012. Corporate branding: An interdisciplinary literature review. European Journal of Marketing 46(5): 733–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S.T., A.J. Cuddy, P. Glick, and J. Xu. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 878–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. 1998. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 24(4): 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freling, T.H., J.L. Crosno, and D.H. Henard. 2011. Brand personality appeal: Conceptualization and empirical validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39(3): 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freling, T.H., and L.P. Forbes. 2005. An empirical analysis of the brand personality effect. Journal of Product and Brand Management 14(7): 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geuens, M., B. Weijters, and K. De Wulf. 2009. A new measure of brand personality. International Journal of Research in Marketing 26(2): 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. 1996. A bibliometric approach to social sciences. National research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990–1992. Scientometrics 35(3): 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L.R. 1990. An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(6): 1216–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann, B. 2009. Gender dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 46(1): 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halonen, E. 2013. ‘Mirror, mirror on the wall, which brand is like me most of all?’ Integrating consumers into brand personality measurement. IJMR Young Research Writer Award 2012. International Journal of Market Research 55(1): 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heding, T., C.F. Knudtzen, and M. Bjerre. 2009. Brand management: Research theory and practice, 1st ed. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, J.G., and M. Supphellen. 2004. A conceptual and measurement comparison of self-congruity and brand personality—The impact of socially desirable responding. International Journal of Market Research 46(2): 205–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosany, S., Y. Ekinci, and M. Uysal. 2006. Destination image and destination personality: An application of branding theories to tourism places. Journal of Business Research 59(5): 638–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H.H., V.-W. Mitchell, and R. Rosenaum-Elliott. 2012. Are consumer and brand personalities the same? Psychology & Marketing 29(5): 334–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivens, B.S., A. Leischnig, B. Muller, and K. Valta. 2015. On the role of brand stereotypes in shaping consumer response toward brands: An empirical examination of direct and mediating effects of warmth and competence. Psychology & Marketing 32(8): 808–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johar, G.V., J. Sengupta, and J.L. Aaker. 2005. Two roads to updating brand personality impressions: Trait versus evaluative inferencing. Journal of Marketing Research 42(4): 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, D.R., and J.K. Park. 2016. Mindsets matter: Implications for branding research and practice. Journal of Consumer Psychology 26(1): 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O.P., and S. Srivastava. 1999. The big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research, ed. L.A. Pervin and O.P. John, Vol. 2, 102–138. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L., and K. Richey. 2006. The importance of corporate brand personality traits to a successful 21st century business. Journal of Brand Management 14(1–2): 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kervyn, N., S.T. Fiske, and C. Malone. 2012. Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22(2): 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C.K., D. Han, and S.B. Park. 2001. The effect of brand personality and brand identification on brand loyalty: Applying the theory of social identification. Japanese Psychological Research 43(4): 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, R.E., S.S. Kleine, and J.B. Kernan. 1993. Mundane consumption and the self: A social-identity perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2(3): 209–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kressmann, F., M.J. Sirgy, A. Herrmann, F. Huber, S. Huber, and D.J. Lee. 2006. Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research 59(9): 955–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, K.C., and I. Phau. 2007. Extending symbolic brands using their personality: Examining antecedents and implications towards brand image fit and brand dilution. Psychology & Marketing 24(5): 421–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S.J. 1959. Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review 37(4): 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., J. Li, D. Mizerski, and H. Soh. 2012. Self-congruity, brand attitude, and brand loyalty: A study on luxury brands. European Journal of Marketing 46(7/8): 922–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacInnis, D.J. 2011. A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing 75(4): 136–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maehle, N., and M. Supphellen. 2011. In search of the sources of brand personality. International Journal of Market Research 53(1): 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malar, L., H. Krohmer, W.D. Hoyer, and B. Nyffenegger. 2011. Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing 75(4): 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, P., H.H. Chun, and D. Maheswaran. 2016. Consumer mindsets and self-enhancement: Signaling versus learning. Journal of Consumer Psychology 26(1): 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, P., S.P. Jain, and D. Maheswaran. 2012. Consumers’ implicit theories about personality influence their brand personality judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22(4): 545–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. 1986. Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research 13(1): 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R., and P.T. Costa Jr. 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist 52(5): 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milas, G., and B. Mlacic. 2007. Brand personality and human personality: Findings from ratings of familiar Croatian brands. Journal of Business Research 60(6): 620–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M.C., and C.S. Dweck. 2016. Mindsets shape consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 26(1): 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., and S. Herm. 2013. Shaping retail brand personality perceptions by bodily experiences. Journal of Retailing 89(4): 438–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.K., and D.R. John. 2010. Got to get you into my life: Do brand personalities rub off on consumers? Journal of Consumer Research 37(4): 655–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.K., and D.R. John. 2012. Capitalizing on brand personalities in advertising: The influence of implicit self-theories on ad appeal effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22(3): 424–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, B.T. 2009. A comparison of brand personality and brand user-imagery congruence. The Journal of Consumer Marketing 26(3): 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillania, R.K., and M. Fetscherin. 2009. The state of research on multinationals and emerging markets. Multinational Business Review 17(2): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, L.F., R. Opoku, M. Hultman, R. Abratt, and S. Spyropoulou. 2007. What I say about myself: Communication of brand personality by African countries. Tourism Management 28(3): 835–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J. T. (1985). Brand personality: A strategic concept for multinational advertising. Paper presented at the Marketing Educator’s Conference, New York.

  • Raan, A.F.J.V. 2008. Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(3): 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnatunga, J., and C. Romano. 1997. A “citation classics” analysis of articles in contemporary small enterprise research. Journal of Business Venturing 12(3): 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., and C. Parker. 2006. Evolution of branding theory and its relevance to the independent retail sector. The Marketing Review 6(1): 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, B. 2012. The consumer psychology of brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22(1): 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M.J. 1982. Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research 9(3): 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. 1999. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(9): 799–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stach, J. 2015. A conceptual framework for the assessment of brand congruent sensory modalities. Journal of Brand Management 22(8): 673–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokburger-Sauer, N., S. Ratneshwar, and S. Sen. 2012. Drivers of consumer–brand identification. International Journal of Research in Marketing 29(4): 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y., and S.M. Choi. 2010. The influence of self-construal on self-brand congruity in the United States and Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 20(10): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y.J., and J. Kim. 2010. Effects of brand personality on brand trust and brand affect. Psychology & Marketing 27(7): 639–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y.J., and S.F. Tinkham. 2005. Brand personality structures in the United States and Korea: Common and culture-specific factors. Journal of Consumer Psychology 15(4): 334–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R.I., and B.M. Staw. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, V., K.M. Stilley, and R. Ahluwalia. 2009. When brand personality matters: The moderating role of attachment styles. Journal of Consumer Research 35(6): 985–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J.C., and C. Brandon. 2006. Brand personality: Exploring the potential to move from factor analytical to circumplex models. Psychology & Marketing 23(8): 639–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., J. Hessels, and D. Li. 2016. Comparative international entrepreneurship a review and research agenda. Journal of Management 42(1): 299–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usakli, A., and S. Baloglu. 2011. Brand personality of tourist destinations: An application of self-congruity theory. Tourism Management 32(1): 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venable, B.T., G.M. Rose, V.D. Bush, and F.W. Gilbert. 2005. The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33(3): 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, D. 2009. The effect of employee behavior on brand personality impressions and brand attitudes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 37(3): 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, M.S. 2010. The decline of conceptual articles and implications for knowledge development. Journal of Marketing 74(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorkston, E.A., J.C. Nunes, and S. Matta. 2010. The malleable brand: The role of implicit theories in evaluating brand extensions. Journal of Marketing 74(1): 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktoria Maria Radler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radler, V.M. 20 Years of brand personality: a bibliometric review and research agenda. J Brand Manag 25, 370–383 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0083-z

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0083-z

Keywords

  • Brand personality
  • Literature review
  • Bibliometric analysis
  • Co-citation meta-analysis
  • Consumer–brand relationship
  • Brand personalities