Abstract
Although the current literature in brand extensions is replete with studies in both line and category extensions, the effect of brand breadth (magnitude of the category extensions) is still yet to be thoroughly examined. Few researchers have focused on brand breadth, to suggest when to choose a narrow (vs. broad) brand extension strategy. Accordingly, no theoretical explanations support the coexistence of both narrow brands (i.e., brands with extensions in similar categories) and broad brands (i.e., brands with extensions in dissimilar categories), particularly in the luxury market. In order to provide guidelines for luxury marketers to enhance overall brand equity, we investigate conditions under which narrow brands are more strongly preferred to broad brands in the luxury market, using a total of 389 respondents recruited via Amazon M-turks and 230 university volunteers in four experiments. Findings demonstrate that narrow brands are liked more than broad brands only with consumers who feel powerful and desire status, and especially when the consumption occurs in public. Highlighting the importance of brand breadth, the current research contributes to the literature in brand extensions and luxury branding by supplying theoretical guidelines to formulate successful brand extension strategies for luxury marketers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaker, D.A., and K.L. Keller. 1990. Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing 54 (1): 27–41.
Ahluwalia, R. 2008. How far can a brand stretch? Understanding the role of self-construal. Journal of Marketing Research 45 (3): 337–350.
Albrecht, C.-M., C. Backhaus, H. Gurzki, and D.M. Woisetschläger. 2013. Drivers of brand extension success: What really matters for luxury brands. Psychology and Marketing 30 (8): 647–659.
Bagwell, L.S., and B.D. Bernheim. 1996. Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. The American Economic Review 86 (3): 349–373.
Bain & Company. 2012. Luxury update 2012. http://www.bain.com/about/press/press-releases/spring-luxury-update-2016.aspx. Accessed 2 Oct 2016.
Bain & Company. 2016. Spring luxury update 2016. http://www.bain.com/about/press/press-releases/spring-luxury-update-2016.aspx. Accessed 2 Oct 2016.
Belk, R.W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 139–168.
Berger, J., and C. Heath. 2007. Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (2): 121–134.
Berger, J., and M. Ward. 2010. Subtle signals of inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Research 37 (4): 555–569.
Bhat, S., and S.K. Reddy. 2001. The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Business Research 53 (3): 111–122.
Boush, D.M., and B. Loken. 1991. A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research 28 (1): 16–28.
Broniarczyk, S.M., and J.W. Alba. 1994. The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (2): 214–228.
Chan, W.Y., C.K.M. To, and W.C. Chu. 2015. Materialistic consumers who seek unique products: How does their need for status and their affective response facilitate the repurchase intention of luxury goods? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 27: 1–10.
Charles, K.K., E. Hurst, and N. Roussanov. 2009. Conspicuous consumption and race. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2): 425–455.
Czellar, S. 2003. Consumer attitude toward brand extensions: An integrative model and research propositions. International Journal of Research in Marketing 20 (1): 97–115.
Dacin, P.A., and D.C. Smith. 1994. The effect of brand portfolio characteristics on consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (2): 229–242.
Dall’Olmo Riley, F., J.M. Pina, and R. Bravo. 2015. The role of perceived value in vertical brand extensions of luxury and premium brands. Journal of Marketing Management 31 (7–8): 881–913.
De Barnier, V., S. Falcy, and P. Valette-florence. 2012. Do consumers perceive three levels of luxury? A comparison of accessible, intermediate and inaccessible luxury brands. Journal of Brand Management 19 (7): 623–636.
Deloitte. 2016. Global powers of luxury goods 2016: Disciplined innovation. New York: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.
Domhoff, G.W. 1998. Who rules America? Power and politics in the year 2000. Houston: Mayfield Publishing Company.
Dubois, B., and P. Duquesne. 1993. The market for luxury goods: Income versus culture. European Journal of Marketing 27 (1): 35.
Dubois, D., D.D. Rucker, and A.D. Galinsky. 2012. Super size me: Product size as a signal of Status. Journal of Consumer Research 38 (6): 1047–1062.
Dubois, D., D.D. Rucker, and A.D. Galinsky. 2015. Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 108 (3): 436–449.
Dwivedi, A., B. Merrilees, and A. Sweeney. 2010. Brand extension feedback effects: A holistic framework. Journal of Brand Management 17 (5): 328–342.
Galinsky, A.D., D.H. Gruenfeld, and J.C. Magee. 2003. From Power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (3): 453–466.
Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Griskevicius, V., N.J. Goldstein, C.R. Mortensen, et al. 2009. Fear and loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, emotion, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research 46 (3): 384–395.
Hagtvedt, H., and V.M. Patrick. 2009. The broad embrace of luxury: Hedonic potential as a driver of brand extendibility. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19 (4): 608–618.
Han, Y.J., J.C. Nunes, and X. Drèze. 2010. Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing 74 (4): 15–30.
Hem, L.E., L. de Chernatony, and N.M. Iversen. 2003. Factors influencing successful brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Management 19 (7–8): 781–806.
Hennigs, N., K. Wiedmann, S. Behrens, and C. Klarmann. 2013. Unleashing the power of luxury: Antecedents of luxury brand perception and effects on luxury brand strength. Journal of Brand Management 20 (8): 705–715.
Henry, P.C. 2005. Social class, market situation, and consumers’ metaphors of (dis)empowerment. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (4): 766–778.
Kapferer, J.-N., and V. Bastien. 2009. The luxury strategy: Break the rules of marketing to build luxury brands. London: Kogan Page.
Kapferer, J.-N., and P. Valette-Florence. 2016. Beyond rarity: The paths of luxury desire. How luxury brands grow yet remain desirable. Journal of Product and Brand Management 25 (2): 120–133.
Kastanakis, M.N., and G. Balabanis. 2014. Explaining variation in conspicuous luxury consumption: An individual differences’ perspective. Journal of Business Research 67 (10): 2147–2154.
Keller, K.L. 2009. Managing the growth tradeoff: Challenges and opportunities in luxury branding. Journal of Brand Management 16 (5–6): 290–301.
Keller, K.L. 2013. Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. 4th edn. Pearson. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/program/Keller-Strategic-Brand-Management-4th-Edition/PGM152495.html.
Keller, K.L. 2016. Reflections on customer-based brand equity: Perspectives, progress, and priorities. AMS Review 6 (1–2): 1–16.
Keller, K.L., and D.A. Aaker. 1992. The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research 29 (1): 35–50.
Keltner, D., D.H. Gruenfeld, and C. Anderson. 2003. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review 110 (2): 265–284.
Kim, C.K., A.M. Lavack, and M. Smith. 2001. Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands. Journal of Business Research 52 (3): 211–222.
Kim, J., and H.-H. Lee. 2015. Impacts of U.S. affluent consumers’ luxury goods consumption beliefs on repeat purchases of luxury goods: Generational and gender comparison analyses. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing 6 (3): 207–221.
Kirmani, A., S. Sood, and S. Bridges. 1999. The ownership effect in consumer responses to brand line stretches. Journal of Marketing 63 (1): 88–101.
Latter, C., I. Phau, and C. Marchegiani. 2010. The roles of consumers need for uniqueness and status consumption in haute couture luxury brands. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing 1 (4): 206–214.
Lee, F., and L.Z. Tiedens. 2001. Is it lonely at the top? The independence and interdependence of power holders. Research in Organizational Behavior, An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews 23: 43–91.
Liebenstein, H. 1950. Bandwagon, snob, and veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 64 (2): 183–207.
Liu, F., J. Li, D. Mizerski, et al. 2012. Self-congruity, brand attitude, and brand loyalty: A study on luxury brands. European Journal of Marketing 46 (7/8): 922–937.
Magee, J.C., and A.D. Galinsky. 2008. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1): 351–398.
Mandel, N., P.K. Petrova, and R.B. Cialdini. 2006. Images of success and the preference for luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) 16 (1): 57–69.
Martínez, E., and J.M. Pina. 2010. Consumer responses to brand extensions: A comprehensive model. European Journal of Marketing 44 (7/8): 1182–1205.
Meyvis, T., and C. Janiszewski. 2004. When are broader brands stronger brands? An accessibility perspective on the success of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (2): 346–357.
Nueno, J.L., and J.A. Quelch. 1998. The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons 41 (6): 61–68.
Nunes, J.C., X. Drèze, and Y.J. Han. 2011. Conspicuous consumption in a recession: Toning it down or turning it up? Journal of Consumer Psychology 21 (2): 199–205.
Ordabayeva, N., and P. Chandon. 2011. Getting ahead of the Joneses: When equality increases conspicuous consumption among bottom-tier consumers. Journal of Consumer Research 38 (1): 27–41.
Park, C.W., S. Milberg, and R. Lawson. 1991. Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research 18 (2): 185–193.
Pitta, D.A., and L.P. Katsanis. 1995. Understanding brand equity for successful brand extension. The Journal of Consumer Marketing 12 (4): 51.
Ratner, R.K., and B.E. Kahn. 2002. The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (2): 246–257.
Reddy, M., and N. Terblanche. 2005. How not to extend your luxury brand. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2005/12/how-not-to-extend-your-luxury-brand. Accessed 31 Aug 2016.
Reddy, M., N. Terblanche, L. Pitt, and M. Parent. 2009. How far can luxury brands travel? Avoiding the pitfalls of luxury brand extension. Business Horizons 52 (2): 187–197.
Reyneke, M., A. Sorokácová, and L. Pitt. 2012. Managing brands in times of economic downturn: How do luxury brands fare? Journal of Brand Management 19 (6): 457–466.
Rucker, D.D., and A.D. Galinsky. 2008. Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (2): 257–267.
Rucker, D.D., and A.D. Galinsky. 2009. Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (3): 549–555.
Rucker, D.D., and S. He. 2016. Psychological mindsets affect consumption: How different mindsets help (hurt) portion control. Appetite, Consumer psychology and portion size: Making smaller better 103: 425–431.
Rucker, D.D., M. Hu, and A.D. Galinsky. 2014. The experience versus the expectations of power: A recipe for altering the effects of power on behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 41 (2): 381–396.
Salinas, E.M., and J.M.P. Pérez. 2009. Modeling the brand extensions’ influence on brand image. Journal of Business Research 62 (1): 50–60.
Sharp, B.M. 1993. Managing brand extension. The Journal of Consumer Marketing 10 (3): 11.
Sheinin, D.A., and B.H. Schmitt. 1994. Extending brands with new product concepts: The role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth. Journal of Business Research 31 (1): 1–10.
Silverstein, M., and N. Fiske. 2003. Trading up: The new American luxury. Oklahoma: Portfolio.
Stankeviciute, R., and J. Hoffmann. 2010. The impact of brand extension on the parent luxury fashion brand: The cases of Giorgio Armani, Calvin Klein and Jimmy Choo. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing 1 (2): 119–128.
Veblen, T. 1899. Theory of the leisure class: An economic study of Institutions. New York: McMillan.
Völckner, F., and H. Sattler. 2007. Empirical generalizability of consumer evaluations of brand extensions. International Journal of Research in Marketing 24 (2): 149–162.
Wang, Y., and V. Griskevicius. 2014. Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women’s luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research 40 (5): 834–854.
White, K., and D.W. Dahl. 2006. To be or not be? The influence of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) 16 (4): 404–414.
Wiedmann, K.-P., N. Hennigs, and A. Siebels. 2009. Value-based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior. Psychology and Marketing 26 (7): 625–651.
Wilcox, K., H.M. Kim, and S. Sen. 2009. Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands? Journal of Marketing Research 46 (2): 247–259.
Zhao, X., J.G. Lynch, and Q. Chen. 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 37 (2): 197–206.
Zheng, C., K. Ma, Q. Duan, and H. Wang. 2015. Ineffective brand extensions and the Sisyphus Effect. Journal of Product and Brand Management 24 (2): 165–171.
Zimbardo, P.G., C. Haney, and C. Banks. 1974. The psychology of imprisonment: Privation, power, and pathology. In: Doing unto others: Explorations in social behavior, 61–73. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Appendices
Appendix 1
-
1.
The below is the stimulus shown to the participants assigned to the condition of the narrow luxury brand. Instead of using terms “narrow luxury brand,” we explained what the term represents in order to ensure informed responses.
Please carefully read the following information about luxury brands. You will be asked to indicate your thoughts about them in the next page.
A company uses its established brand name to introduce a new product category. The new category to which a brand is extended can be related or unrelated to its original product category. This marketing initiative is called brand extension. Many luxury brands adopt the brand extension strategy as well. One type of brand extensions adopted by luxury brands is narrow brand extensions. Narrow brand extensions occur when a luxury brand extends its brand to product categories only similar or related to its original product category.
Please imagine a luxury brand whose original product category is a designer’s fashion clothing. It has decided to take a narrow brand extension strategy. Therefore, it offers bags, shoes, watches, jewelry, sunglasses, and fashion accessories under the same brand name. Its extension range is relatively small and its brand name is only found in a certain number of product categories.
What do you think about a luxury brand with narrow extensions?
-
2.
The below is the stimulus shown to the participants assigned to the condition of the broad luxury brand. Instead of using terms “broad luxury brand,” we explained what the term represents in order to ensure informed responses.
A company uses its established brand name to introduce a new product category. The new category to which a brand is extended can be related or unrelated to its original product category. This marketing initiative is called brand extension. Many luxury brands adopt the brand extension strategy as well. One type of brand extensions adopted by luxury brands is broad brand extensions. Broad brand extensions occur when a luxury brand extends its brand to various kinds of product categories, either similar to or different from its original product category.
Please imagine a luxury brand original product category is a designer’s fashion clothing. It has decided to take a broad extension strategy. Therefore, it offers bags, shoes, watches, fashion accessories, home goods, and hotels under the same brand name. Its product range is relatively large and its brand name is found in diverse product categories.
What do you think about a luxury brand with broad extensions?
Appendix 2
-
1.
Public Consumption
“By public consumption, we mean that people’s consumption behavior is identifiable; this is either because their behaviors will be viewed by other people when they are referred to repeatedly by name, or when they reveal personal information to other people. In the space below, please write down all your thoughts about public consumption.”
-
2.
Private Consumption
“By private consumption, we mean that people’s consumption behavior is unidentifiable; this is either because their behaviors will not be viewed by other people, or their consumption is completely anonymous, or when their personal information is not revealed to other people. In the space below, please write down all your thoughts about private consumption.”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, Y., Wingate, N. Narrow, powerful, and public: the influence of brand breadth in the luxury market. J Brand Manag 24, 453–466 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0043-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0043-7