Trends everywhere? The case of hedge fund styles

Abstract

This paper investigates empirically whether time-series momentum returns can explain the performance of hedge funds in the cross section. Relying on the trend-following literature, a volatility-adjusted time-series momentum signal is applied on a daily basis across a large set of futures, covering the major asset classes. We build a hierarchical set of trend factors: the full version TREND can be split in summable factors across two dimensions: the horizon of the signals and the traded asset class. We show that Managed Futures, Global Macro and Fund of Hedge Funds strategies can be partly explained by a TREND exposure. Moreover, a TREND exposure is a significant determinant of hedge funds returns at the fund level, for Managed Futures and Global Macro but also, and more surprisingly, for the other styles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. 1.

    Backwardation and contango refer to the two possible shapes of a futures curve, the first relates to when the futures price is below the expected spot price and the opposite for the latter.

  2. 2.

    http://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/~dah7/DataLibrary/TF-FAC.xls.

  3. 3.

    Our definition of sub-periods is based on Edelman et al. (2012), who identify March 2009 as a structural break point associated with the end of credit crisis.

  4. 4.

    Instead of using the volatility, we can also build the factor by considering the risk contribution of each market to the final portfolio. In this case, we also include in the factor construction some information on correlation between markets. It could be a solution to get at the end of the process a more balanced factor, when the number of markets across asset classes is heterogeneous.

  5. 5.

    Performances of our factor are gross of fees (management, performance and expense fees) as well as gross of transaction costs.

  6. 6.

    We also modify the specification of Eq. (8) to compare the results we obtain when we replace in this equation the TREND factor by the cross-sectional equity momentum factor (WML). We obtain evidence that the TREND factor brings something else than the standard WML. The same conclusion occurs when we include both WML and TREND in the specification. All these results are available upon request.

References

  1. Agarwal, V., E. Arisoy, and N.Y. Naik. 2015. Volatility of Aggregate Volatility and Hedge Fund Returns. Journal of Financial Economics 125(3): 491–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal, V., G. Bakshib, and J. Huij. 2009. Do Higher-Moment Equity Risks Explain Hedge Fund Returns?

  3. Agarwal, V., and N.Y. Naik. 2001. Characterizing Hedge Fund Risks with Buy-and-Hold and Option-Based Strategies.

  4. Agarwal, V., and N.Y. Naik. 2004. Risks and Portfolio Decisions Involving Hedge Funds. Review of Financial Studies 17(1): 63–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal, V., S. Ruenzi, and F. Weigert. 2017. Tail Risk in Hedge Funds: A Unique View from Portfolio Holdings. Journal of Financial Economics 125(3): 610–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bali, T.G., and S.J. Brown. 2014. Macroeconomic Uncertainty and Expected Stock Returns.

  7. Baltas, N. 2017. Optimising Cross-Asset Carry. In Factor Investing, Chapter 13. 1st ed, ed. E. Jurczenko, 1–29. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baltas, N., and R. Kosowski. 2012. Momentum Strategies in Futures Markets and Trend-Following Funds.

  9. Baltas, N., and R. Kosowski. 2015. Demystifying Time-Series Momentum Strategies: Volatility Estimators, Trading Rules and Pairwise Correlations.

  10. Barberis, N., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. A Model of Investor Sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics 49(3): 307–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buraschi, A., R. Kosowski, and F. Trojani. 2014. When There Is No Place to Hide: Correlation Risk and the Cross-Section of Hedge Fund Returns. Review of Financial Studies 27(2): 581–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carhart, M.M. 1997. On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance 52(1): 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Darolles, S., and G. Mero. 2011. Hedge Fund Returns and Factor Models: A Cross-Sectional Approach. Bankers, Markets and Investors pp. 34–53.

  14. de Roon, F., P. Karehnke, N. Atreya, P. Barroso, O. Chuprinin, J. Driessen, and R. Edelen. 2017. Spanning Tests for Assets with Option-Like Payoffs: The Case of Hedge Funds.

  15. Dor, A.B., R. Jagannathan, and I. Meier. 2003. Understanding Mutual Fund and Hedge Fund Styles Using Returns-Based Style Analysis. Journal of Investment Management 1(1): 94–134.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edelman, D., W. Fung, D.A. Hsieh, and N.Y. Naik. 2012. Funds of hedge funds: performance, risk and capital formation 2005 to 2010. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 26(1): 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Elaut, G., and P. Erdos. 2016. Adaptive Time Series Momentum: An Objective Benchmarket for Systematic Trend-Following Strategies.

  18. Fama, E.F., and K. French. 1996. Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies. Journal of Finance 21(1): 55–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fung, W., and D.A. Hsieh. 2001. The Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Theory and Evidence from Trend Followers. The Review of Financial Studies 18(4): 313–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fung, W., and D.A. Hsieh. 2004. Hedge Fund Benchmarks: A Risk-Based Approach. Financial Analysts Journal 60(5): 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Getmansky, M., A.W. Lo, and I. Makarov. 2004. An Econometric Model of Serial Correlation and Illiquidity in Hedge Fund Returns. Journal of Financial Economics 74(3): 529–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasanhodzic, J., and A.W. Lo. 2007. Can Hedge-Fund Returns Be Replicated?: The Linear Case. Journal of Investment Management 5(2): 5–45.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hurst, B., Y.H. Ooi, and L.H. Pedersen. 2013. De-Mystifying Managed Futures. Journal of Investment Management 11(3): 42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hutchinson, M.C., and J.O. Brien. 2015. Time Series Momentum and Macroeconomic Risk. pp. 1–45

  25. Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman. 1993. Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of finance 48(1): 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koijen, R.S.J., T.J. Moskowitz, L.H. Pedersen, and E.B. Vrugt. 2016. Carry.

  27. Mitchell, M., and T. Pulvino. 2001. Characteristics of Risk and Return in Risk Arbitrage. The Journal of Finance 56(6): 2135–2175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moskowitz, T.J., Y.H. Ooi, and L.H. Pedersen. 2012. Time Series Momentum. Journal of Financial Economics 104(2): 228–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patton, A.J. 2009. Are “Market Neutral” Hedge Funds Really Market Neutral? The Review of Financial Studies 22(7): 2495–2530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Patton, A.J. 2013. On the Dynamics of Hedge Fund Risk Exposures. The Journal of Finance 68(2): 597–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadka, R. 2009. Liquidity Risk and the Cross-Section of Hedge-Fund Returns. Journal of Financial Economics 98(1): 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sadka, R. 2012. Hedge-Fund Performance and Liquidity Risk. Journal of Investment Management 10(2): 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sharpe, W.F. 1964. Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance 19(3): 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Pedro Barroso, Paul Karehnke, Guillaume Monarcha and the people at KeyQuant, for various useful comments and suggestions. In addition, we are grateful to the participants of: the DRM Finance PhD Seminar, the Quantitative Finance and Financial Econometrics 2018 Conference, the Econometric Research in Finance 2018 Workshop, the 10th French Econometrics Conference, the 12th International Conference on Computational and Financial Econometrics, the 11th Annual Hedge Funds and Private Equity Research Conference, the 12th Financial Risks International Forum, the ANR MultiRisk 2019 Workshop and the 36th International Conference of the French Finance Association. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the chair QuantValley/Risk Foundation “Quantitative Management Initiative.” We are also grateful to the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), which supported this work via the Project MultiRisk (ANR-16-CE26-0015-02).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Chevalier.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 20, 21.

Table 20 Description of the HFRI database
Table 21 Pearson correlation of F&H factors and TREND on a selection of 6 futures (S&P500, US10Y T-note, EUR/USD, Corn, Gold and Crude Oil), on the FH sub-period running from January 2010 to March 2016

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chevalier, C., Darolles, S. Trends everywhere? The case of hedge fund styles. J Asset Manag 20, 442–468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-019-00141-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Managed Futures
  • Time-series momentum
  • Trend following
  • Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA)
  • Hedge funds
  • Trading strategies

JEL Classification

  • G11
  • G12
  • G15
  • F37