Abstract
Public diplomacy (PD) as a field of study lacks both theoretical and methodological depth. Although a wide range of methodology is used to study the field, case studies, surveys, and content analyses are the most frequently used. While these methods are necessary to study PD, they lack the ability to establish a causal relationship between variables. A lot of attention in PD scholarship is now on digitalization and the use of social media in PD. Similarly, a significant portion of scholarship is devoted to analyzing PD messages. This article argues that experimental methodology is an important but under-utilized tool for scholars in the field. Controlled experiments are believed to be the best method to determine cause-and-effect relationships among variables. The article aims to help scholars of the discipline conduct controlled experiments that further their understanding of PD campaigns and messages. It does so by detailing experiments as a methodology, indicating what type of research questions can be answered by this approach and how to carry out an experiment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayhan, Kadir. 2019. The boundaries of public diplomacy and nonstate actors: A taxonomy of perspectives. International Studies Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/eky010.
Balmas, Meital. 2018. Tell me who is your leader, and I will tell you who you are: Foreign leaders’ perceived personality and public attitudes toward their countries and citizenry. American Journal of Political Science 62 (2): 499–514.
Campbell, D.T., and J.C. Stanley. 2003. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in prevention research. NIDA Research Monograph.
Cortés, Juve J., and Thomas Jamieson. 2020. Incorporating research design in public diplomacy: The role of listening to foreign publics. International Journal of Communication 14: 18.
Dragojlovic, Nick. 2015. Listening to outsiders: The impact of messenger nationality on transnational persuasion in the United States. International Studies Quarterly 59 (1): 73–85.
Fisher, Aleksandr. 2020. Demonizing the enemy: The influence of Russian state-sponsored media on American audiences. Post-Soviet Affairs 36 (4): 281–296.
Gilboa, Eytan. 2008. Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142.
Golan, Guy J. 2013. An integrated approach to public diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (9): 1251–1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213487711.
Guardino, Matt, and Danny Hayes. 2018. Foreign voices, party cues, and US public opinion about military action. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30 (3): 504–516.
Hasnat, Imran. 2021. Public diplomacy in social media: an examination of Twitter use by foreign embassies in the U.S. PhD Dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Hasnat, Imran, and Elanie Steyn. 2020. Toward a “Beautiful Bangladesh”: The bleed-over effect of tourism advertising. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 16 (2): 165–173.
Ingenhoff, Diana, Alexander Buhmann, Candace White, Tianduo Zhang, and Spiro Kiousis. 2017. Reputation spillover: Corporate crises’ effects on country reputation. Journal of Communication Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2017-0081.
Kim, Hwajung. 2017. Bridging the theoretical gap between public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy. The Korean Journal of International Studies 15 (2): 293–326. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2017.08.15.2.293.
Leshner, Glenn. 2014. The basics of experimental research in media studies. In The international encyclopedia of media studies. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems181.
Maclean, Johanna Catherine, John Buckell, and Marti Joachim. 2019. Information source and cigarettes: Experimental evidence on the messenger effect. NBER Working Papers 25632.
Manor, Ilan. 2017. The digitalization of diplomacy: Toward clarification of a fractured terminology. Working Paper No. 2 (2), p. 19.
McDermott, Rose. 2011. Internal and external validity. In Cambridge handbook of experimental political Science, 27–40. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McQuail, Denis. 1985. Sociology of mass communication. Annual Review of Sociology 11 (1): 93–111.
Melissen, Jan. 2005. The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice. In The new public diplomacy. Basingstoke: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_1.
Pamment, James. 2014. Articulating influence: Toward a research agenda for interpreting the evaluation of soft power, public diplomacy and nation brands ion brands. Public Relations Review 40 (1): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.11.019.
Schatz, Edward, and Renan Levine. 2010. Framing, public diplomacy, and anti-Americanism in Central Asia. International Studies Quarterly 54 (3): 855–869.
Sevin, Efe, Emily T. Metzgar, and Hayden Craig. 2019. The scholarship of public diplomacy: Analysis of a growing field. International Journal of Communication 13: 4814–4837.
Shaker, Lee, and Paul Falzone. 2015. Priming, rap news and public diplomacy: Reporting on an NGO-led media initiative in Uganda. International Journal of Communication 9: 22.
Thorson, Esther, Rob Wicks, and Glenn Leshner. 2012. Experimental methodology in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 89 (1): 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011430066.
Winer, Russell S. 1999. Experimentation in the 21st century: The importance of external validity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (3): 349–358.
Yang, Fang, and B. Bergh. 2016. Movies influence on country concept. In Shaping international public opinion: A model for nation branding and public diplomacy, 113–132. New York: Peter Lang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hasnat, I., Leshner, G. Experimental methods in public diplomacy. Place Brand Public Dipl 18, 254–260 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00261-7
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00261-7