Abstract
This paper argues that non-state actors (NSAs) that challenge their respective states can claim a stake in their country’s public diplomacy by introducing and promoting narratives that (a) disrupt the official state-supported narratives and (b) present a more complex picture of their country-of-origin to the foreign publics. To conceptualize this type of engagement with foreign audiences, this project proposes the term “alternative agents” or “alt agents” of non-state public diplomacy. The paper combines Kelley’s (Agency change: diplomatic action beyond the state, Owman & Littlefield, London, 2014) framework of diplomatic capabilities of NSAs with Miskimmon et al. (Strategic narratives: communication power and the new world order, Routledge, New York, 2014) concept of strategic narratives to develop the definition of alt agents of public diplomacy. Using the case study of the transnational movement Open Russia, the paper illustrates how the work of alt agents aimed at connecting with foreign constituencies in order to achieve their political goals might look like in practice. The paper contributes to the scholarship on non-state public diplomacy by engaging with the relatively unexplored question of the role of adversarial non-state actors in public diplomacy, and the dynamic of their engagement with foreign stakeholders.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
Magnitsky Act is a bipartisan bill that was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed by President Obama in 2012. Magnitsky Act intended to punish Russian officials responsible for the death of Sergei Magnitsky—a tax accountant who investigated a large fraud involving Russia tax officials and died in a Moscow prison in 2009.
References
A Tale of Two Russias. 2018. Mikhail Khodorkovsky On “The Real Russia,” Sanctions and How the West Can Deal with Putin’s Clan. Khodorkovsky.ru, 5 March, https://www.khodorkovsky.com/tale-two-russias/. Accessed 3 April 2018.
About Us. (n.d.) Institute of Modern Russia website at IMRussia.org, https://imrussia.org/en/about-us. Accessed 24 March 2018.
Anden-Papadopoulos, K., and M. Pantti. 2013. The media work of Syrian diaspora activists: Brokering between the protest and mainstream media. International Journal of Communication 7: 2185–2206.
Attias, S. 2012. Israel’s new peer-to-peer diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7 (4): 473–482.
Ayhan, K. 2018. Branding Korea as “My Friend’s Country”: The case of Vank’s cyber public diplomats. Korea Observer 49 (1): 51–81.
Ayhan, K. 2019. The boundaries of public diplomacy and non-state actors: A taxonomy of perspectives. International Studies Perspectives 20 (1): 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/eky010.
Bonet, P. 2014. I hope Putin makes a mistake. Interview with Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Khodorkovsky.ru, 21 September, https://khodorkovsky.ru/mbh/press/elpais/. Accessed 24 March 2018.
Burns, R. 2017. Kremlin convinced U.S. is intent on regime change in Russia, Intel report says, The Chicago Tribune, 28 June, http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-russia-united-states-tensions-20170628-story.html. Accessed 24 March 2018.
Byrne, C. 2016. Australia’s new Colombo Plan: Enhancing regional soft power through student mobility. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 71 (1): 107–128.
Castells, M. 2010. The rise of the network society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dokumenty, prinyatye na uchreditelnoy konferencii dvizheniya Otkrytaya Rossiya [Documents adopted at the inaugural conference of the Open Russia movement] (n.d.) Website of Open Russia https://old.openrussia.org/post/view/19839/. Accessed 24 March 2018.
Emerson, R.M., R.I. Fretz, and L.I. Shaw. 2011. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Golan, G. 2015. An integrated approach to public diplomacy. In International Public relations and public diplomacy: Communication and engagement, ed. G.J. Golan, S. Yang, and D.F. Kinsey. New York: Peter Lang.
Gregory, B. 2008. Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 274–290.
Gregory, B. 2011. American public diplomacy: Enduring characteristics, elusive transformation. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 6 (3): 274–290.
Gregory, B. 2016. Mapping boundaries in diplomacy’s public dimension. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 11 (1): 1–25.
Haas, P.M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.
Hayden, C. 2009. Applied public diplomacy: A marketing communications exchange program in Saudi Arabia. American Behavioral Scientist 53 (4): 533–548.
Hocking, B. 2004. Privatizing diplomacy? International Studies Perspectives 5 (2): 147–152.
Huijgh, E. 2011. Changing tunes for public diplomacy: exploring the domestic dimension. Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy 2 (1): 62–73.
Huijgh, E. 2012. Public diplomacy in flux: Introducing the domestic dimension. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7 (4): 359–367.
Korby, B., and H. Pavliva. 2014. Khodorkovsky sees 1917-like crisis nearing under Putin, Bloomberg, 3 October. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-10-03/khodorkovsky-sees-1917-like-crisis-nearing-under-putin. Accessed 22 March 2018.
Kozinets, R.V. 2015. Netnography: Redefined, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kelley, J.R. 2010. The new diplomacy: evolution of a revolution. Diplomacy & Statecraft 21 (2): 286–305.
Kelley, J.R. 2014. Agency change: Diplomatic action beyond the state. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
Khvostunova, O. 2017. IMR held discussions on the future of Russia’s democratic movement and on justice in the Nemtsov case. IMRussia.org, 13 September, https://imrussia.org/en/news/2849-imr-held-discussions-on-the-future-of-russia’s-democratic-movement-and-on-justice-in-the-nemtsov-case. Accessed 22 March 2018.
Khvostunova, O. 2018. Daniel Fried: “This list is a missed opportunity”. Interview with Daniel Fried, IMRussia.org, 1 February, https://imrussia.org/en/opinions/2907-daniel-fried-“this-list-is-a-missed-opportunity. Accessed 22 March 2018.
Khvostunova, O. 2018. Michael Khodarkovsky: “Democracy in Russia is not only possible—it’s inevitable.” Interview with Michael Khodarkovsky, IMRussia.org, 15 March, https://imrussia.org/en/opinions/2931-michael-khodarkovsky-“democracy-in-russia-is-not-only-possible—it’s-inevitable”. Accessed 24 March 2018.
La Porte, T. 2012. The impact of “intermestic” non-state actors on the conceptual framework of public diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7 (4): 441–458.
Langhorne, R. 2005. The diplomacy of non-state actors. Diplomacy & Statecraft 16 (2): 331–339.
Lee, G., and K. Ayhan. 2015. Why do we need non-state actors in public diplomacy? Theoretical discussion of relational, networked and collaborative public diplomacy. Journal of International and Area Studies 23 (1): 57–77.
Lindlof, T.R., and B.C. Taylor. 2002. Qualitative communication research methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
McDowell, M. 2008. Public diplomacy at the crossroads: Definitions and challenges in an open source era. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 32: 7–15.
Mikhail Khodorkovsky meets with Lithuanian Foreign Minister. 2018. Khodorkovsky.ru, 27 March, https://www.khodorkovsky.com/mikhail-khodorkovsky-meets-lithuanian-foreign-minister/. Accessed 29 March 2018.
Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle. 2014. Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. New York: Routledge.
Open Russia (n.d.). Khodorkovsky.com, https://www.khodorkovsky.com/biography/open-russia/. Accessed 15 March 2018.
Philanthropy. Khodorkovsky.com, https://www.khodorkovsky.com/biography/philanthropy/. Accessed 15 March 2018.
Putin’s Russia—A discussion with Dr. Leon Aron and Vladimir Kara-Murza. 2018. American Enterprise Institute, 15 January, YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9557EySy40. Accessed 15 March 2018.
Russian Embassy in Washington now located on Nemtsov Plaza. 2018. Bloomberg News, 28 February, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-27/russian-embassy-in-dc-now-located-on-nemtsov-plaza. Accessed 15 March 2018.
Sharp, P. 2005. Revolutionary states, Outlaw regimes and the techniques of public diplomacy. In The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations, ed. J. Melissen, 106–123. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Snow Jr., C. 2008. The privatization of US public diplomacy. Fletcher Forum for World Affairs 32 (1): 189–200.
Sonne, P. 2015. U.S. is trying to dismember Russia, says Putin adviser. The Wall Street Journal, 11 February, https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-is-trying-to-dismember-russia-says-putin-adviser-1423667319. Accessed 20 March 2018.
Stake, R.E. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Taylor, A. 2018. “The Kremlin List:” Why Russian Oligarchs Shrugged. The Washington Post, 30 January, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/01/30/the-kremlin-list-why-russian-oligarchs-shrugged/?utm_term=.a5960d88536d. Accessed 20 March 2018.
Wang, J. 2006. Public diplomacy and global business. Journal of Business Strategy 27 (3): 41–49.
Yin, R. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Zaharna, R.S., and N. Uysal. 2016. Going for the jugular in public diplomacy: How adversarial publics using social media are challenging state legitimacy. Public Relations Review 42 (1): 109–119.
Zatepilina-Monacell, O. 2009. Non-state ambassadors: NGOs’ contribution to America’s public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 5 (2): 156–168.
Zatepilina-Monacell, O. 2012. High stakes: US nonprofit organizations and the US standing abroad. Public Relations Review 38 (3): 471–476.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Kadir Ayhan and Craig Hayden for their thorough and insightful feedback on the earlier drafts of the manuscript, the reviewers for helpful and thought-provoking comments, and the editors for their support and guidance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Popkova, A. Transnational non-state actors as “alt agents” of public diplomacy: Putin’s Russia versus Open Russia. Place Brand Public Dipl 16, 70–79 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00126-6
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00126-6