Skip to main content

DIPLOCAT’s public diplomacy role and the perceptions towards Catalonia among international correspondents


This qualitative study analyses the public diplomacy (PD) role of the Public Diplomacy Council of Catalonia (DIPLOCAT) and delves into the perceptions that international correspondents have towards this region. The objective of DIPLOCAT is to influence foreign public opinion in relation to Catalonia’s will of self-determination. This study proves that international correspondents who have established prior contact with DIPLOCAT in turn also have a positive perception of Catalonia. The research has also found a correlation between the professional needs of correspondents (information sources and materials) and the PD activities being provided by DIPLOCAT. This shows that correspondents’ interests are in line with what DIPLOCAT is strategically offering. These achievements demonstrate that, within the new information age, a small PD structure such as DIPLOCAT is able to achieve remarkable profits in terms of reputation gaining for the territory it represents if the right tools and strategies are used.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Source research from the authors


  1. Diplocat has calculated the estimated economic value their placed Op-eds have on international media (Diplocat 2015).

  2. The clearest achievement in relation to this matter for Diplocat occurred in the Danish Parliament on May 12, 2015. The Danish chamber requested a dialogued, democratic and pacific solution between Catalonia and Spain (La Vanguardia, 19 May 2015).

  3. All the questionnaires graphics are available from the authors.


  • Archetti, C. 2011. Reporting the nation: Understanding the role of foreign correspondents. In 21st century public diplomacy. International Studies Association (ISA) Annual Convention. Montreal, 16–19 March 2011.

  • Anholt, S. 2007. Competitive identity. the new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badia, F. (ed.). 2010. Governs subestatals en l’acció exterior. Utopia i realitat a Catalunya. Barcelona: CIDOB edicions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2008. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalan Public Diplomacy Data. 2015. Diplocat. Diplocat. public diplomacy council of Catalonia. Retrieved from

  • Cull, N.J. 2018. Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cull, N.J. 2010. Public diplomacy: Seven lessons for its future from its past. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 6(1): 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, S. 2013. The European external action service and public diplomacy. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, 127. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.

  • Diplocat. 2015. Economic value op-eds and articles. Barcelona: Diplocat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Cavia, J., and A. Huertas. 2009. Redacción en relaciones públicas. Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Cavia, J., and A. Huertas. 2014. La gestión de las marcas de destino y de territorio desde la perspectiva de las relaciones públicas. Comunicació. Revista de recerca i anàlisi 31(1): 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, E. 2008. Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, E. 2005. The CNN effect: The search for a communication theory of international relations. Political Communication 22 (1): 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guibernau, M. 2014. Prospects for an independent Catalonia. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 27: 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. 2013. Engaging technologies: A comparative study of U.S. and Venezuelan strategies of influence and public diplomacy. International Journal of Communication 7: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R., and W.T. Coombs. 2006. Today’s Public Relations: An Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huertas, A., and J. Fernández-Cavia. 2006. Centre and Periphery: Two speeds for the implementation of public relations in Spain. Public Relations Review 32: 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. 1996. Nations against the state: the new politics of nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • 2015. El parlamento danés apuesta por el “diálogo pacífico y democrático” para resolver la cuestión catalana. March, 19th.

  • Ledingham, J.A. 2003. Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 15(2): 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M., C. Stead, and C. Smewing. 2002. Public Diplomacy. London: Foreign Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, G. 1985. Managing public diplomacy. Washington Quarterly 8(3): 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M., and A. Reynolds. 2012. How the news shapes our civic agenda. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research, ed. J. Bryant, and M.B. Oliver. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor, B.D. 2012. Credibility talk in public diplomacy. Review of International Studies 38(2): 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. 2004. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Perseus Books Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. 2008. Public diplomacy and soft power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quelch, J., and K. Jocz. 2005. Positioning the nation-state. Place Branding 1(3): 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Eugenio, J., and J. Xifra. 2015. International representation strategies for stateless nations: The case of Catalonia’s cultural diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 11(1): 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Eugenio, J., X. Ginesta, and J. Xifra. 2017. Catalonia’s public diplomacy and media relations strategy: A case study of the Eugeni Xammar Programme of International Communication and Public Relations. In: International Public Relations. Perspectives from deeply divided societies, ed. I. Somerville, O. Hargie, M. Taylor and M. Toledano, 113–130.

  • Szondi, G. 2010. From image management to relationship building: A public relations approach to nation branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 6: 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. 2006. Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review 32(2): 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xifra, J. 2009. Catalan public diplomacy, soft power, and noopolitik: A public relations approach to Catalonia’s governance. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 1: 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xifra, J., and D. McKie. 2012. From realpolitik to noopolitik: The public relations of (stateless) nations in an information age. Public Relations Review 38(5): 819–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Torras-Vila.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torras-Vila, J., Fernández-Cavia, J. DIPLOCAT’s public diplomacy role and the perceptions towards Catalonia among international correspondents. Place Brand Public Dipl 14, 213–222 (2018).

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Public diplomacy
  • Public opinion
  • Catalonia perception
  • International correspondents