DIPLOCAT’s public diplomacy role and the perceptions towards Catalonia among international correspondents

Original Article

Abstract

This qualitative study analyses the public diplomacy (PD) role of the Public Diplomacy Council of Catalonia (DIPLOCAT) and delves into the perceptions that international correspondents have towards this region. The objective of DIPLOCAT is to influence foreign public opinion in relation to Catalonia’s will of self-determination. This study proves that international correspondents who have established prior contact with DIPLOCAT in turn also have a positive perception of Catalonia. The research has also found a correlation between the professional needs of correspondents (information sources and materials) and the PD activities being provided by DIPLOCAT. This shows that correspondents’ interests are in line with what DIPLOCAT is strategically offering. These achievements demonstrate that, within the new information age, a small PD structure such as DIPLOCAT is able to achieve remarkable profits in terms of reputation gaining for the territory it represents if the right tools and strategies are used.

Keywords

DIPLOCAT Public diplomacy Public opinion Catalonia perception International correspondents 

References

  1. Archetti, C. 2011. Reporting the nation: Understanding the role of foreign correspondents. In 21st century public diplomacy. International Studies Association (ISA) Annual Convention. Montreal, 16–19 March 2011.Google Scholar
  2. Anholt, S. 2007. Competitive identity. the new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Badia, F. (ed.). 2010. Governs subestatals en l’acció exterior. Utopia i realitat a Catalunya. Barcelona: CIDOB edicions.Google Scholar
  4. Castells, M. 2008. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catalan Public Diplomacy Data. 2015. Diplocat. Diplocat. public diplomacy council of Catalonia. Retrieved from http://diplocat.cat/en/.
  6. Cull, N.J. 2018. Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cull, N.J. 2010. Public diplomacy: Seven lessons for its future from its past. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 6(1): 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duke, S. 2013. The European external action service and public diplomacy. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, 127. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.Google Scholar
  9. Diplocat. 2015. Economic value op-eds and articles. Barcelona: Diplocat.Google Scholar
  10. Fernández-Cavia, J., and A. Huertas. 2009. Redacción en relaciones públicas. Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Fernández-Cavia, J., and A. Huertas. 2014. La gestión de las marcas de destino y de territorio desde la perspectiva de las relaciones públicas. Comunicació. Revista de recerca i anàlisi 31(1): 9–26.Google Scholar
  12. Gilboa, E. 2008. Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilboa, E. 2005. The CNN effect: The search for a communication theory of international relations. Political Communication 22 (1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guibernau, M. 2014. Prospects for an independent Catalonia. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 27: 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayden, C. 2013. Engaging technologies: A comparative study of U.S. and Venezuelan strategies of influence and public diplomacy. International Journal of Communication 7: 1–25.Google Scholar
  16. Heath, R., and W.T. Coombs. 2006. Today’s Public Relations: An Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Huertas, A., and J. Fernández-Cavia. 2006. Centre and Periphery: Two speeds for the implementation of public relations in Spain. Public Relations Review 32: 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keating, M. 1996. Nations against the state: the new politics of nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. LaVanguardia.com. 2015. El parlamento danés apuesta por el “diálogo pacífico y democrático” para resolver la cuestión catalana. March, 19th.Google Scholar
  20. Ledingham, J.A. 2003. Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 15(2): 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leonard, M., C. Stead, and C. Smewing. 2002. Public Diplomacy. London: Foreign Policy Centre.Google Scholar
  22. Malone, G. 1985. Managing public diplomacy. Washington Quarterly 8(3): 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCombs, M., and A. Reynolds. 2012. How the news shapes our civic agenda. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research, ed. J. Bryant, and M.B. Oliver. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Mor, B.D. 2012. Credibility talk in public diplomacy. Review of International Studies 38(2): 393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nye, J. 2004. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
  26. Nye, J. 2008. Public diplomacy and soft power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quelch, J., and K. Jocz. 2005. Positioning the nation-state. Place Branding 1(3): 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. San Eugenio, J., and J. Xifra. 2015. International representation strategies for stateless nations: The case of Catalonia’s cultural diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 11(1): 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. San Eugenio, J., X. Ginesta, and J. Xifra. 2017. Catalonia’s public diplomacy and media relations strategy: A case study of the Eugeni Xammar Programme of International Communication and Public Relations. In: International Public Relations. Perspectives from deeply divided societies, ed. I. Somerville, O. Hargie, M. Taylor and M. Toledano, 113–130.Google Scholar
  30. Szondi, G. 2010. From image management to relationship building: A public relations approach to nation branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 6: 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, J. 2006. Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review 32(2): 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xifra, J. 2009. Catalan public diplomacy, soft power, and noopolitik: A public relations approach to Catalonia’s governance. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 1: 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xifra, J., and D. McKie. 2012. From realpolitik to noopolitik: The public relations of (stateless) nations in an information age. Public Relations Review 38(5): 819–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations