#MacronLeaks as a “warning shot” for European democracies: challenges to election blackouts presented by social media and election meddling during the 2017 French presidential election

  • Joseph DowningEmail author
  • Wasim Ahmed
Original Article


Media blackouts or election silence periods feature in several European democracies. However, this article argues that they have become democratic vulnerabilities in the context of increased Internet-based electoral meddling such as during #MacronLeaks. Using both discourse and social network analyses, this study shows that the vacuum created by the inability of politicians and established media outlets to comment on the leaks empowered unregulated and unreliable sources which sought to drag the direction of the election away from the centre and towards the far right. Our findings have broad implications for understanding how social media activity is structured under the conditions of information leaks. The findings of this study may be relevant to other political events which involve the release of sensitive information via social media.


Election meddling Election silence Twitter Politics Social media Leaks Hashtags 



  1. About Twitter. n.d.. Twitter Usage/Company Facts. Last Accessed 19 June 2017.
  2. Almasy, S. 2017. Emmanuel Macron’s French presidential campaign hacked [online]. Accessed 8 June 2019.
  3. Aragón, P., K.E. Kappler, A. Kaltenbrunner, D. Laniado, and Y. Volkovich. 2013. Communication dynamics in twitter during political campaigns: The case of the 2011 Spanish National election. Policy and Internet 5(2): 1–24. Scholar
  4. Ahmed, W. 2017. Amplified messages: How hashtag activism and Twitter diplomacy converged at #ThisIsACoup – and won. In Politics, protest, emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives. A book of blogs, 109–114. Sheffield: United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  5. Ahmed, W., and S. Lugovic. 2019. Social media analytics: Analysis and visualisation of news diffusion using NodeXL. Online Information Review 43: 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmed, W., P. Bath, and G. Demartini. 2017. Using Twitter as a data source: An overview of ethical, legal, and methodological challenges. In The ethics of online research. Advances in research ethics and integrity, vol. 2, ed. K. Woodfield, 79–107. Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Allcott, H., and M. Gentzkow. 2017. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2): 211–236. Scholar
  8. Bennett, L. 2006. Communicating global activism: Strength and vulnerabilities of networked politics. In Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements, ed. W. van de Donk, B.D. Loader, P.G. Nixon, and D. Rucht. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, W.L. 2012. The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644(1): 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borger, J. 2017. As France becomes latest target, are election hacks the new normal? The Guardian. Accessed 10 July 2017.
  11. Braun, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 32: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, G., B. Gillian, and G. Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruns, A., T. Highfield, and R.A. Lind. 2012. Blogs, Twitter, and breaking news: The produsage of citizen journalism. Produsing Theory in a Digital World: The Intersection of Audiences and Production in Contemporary Theory 80(2012): 15–32.Google Scholar
  14. Conover, M., J. Ratkiewicz, M.R. Francisco, B. Gonçalves, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. 2011. Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM 133: 89–96.Google Scholar
  15. Davies, R. 2009. The use of social network analysis tools in the evaluation of social change communications. Communication for social change consortium.Google Scholar
  16. De Nooy, W., A. Mrvar, and V. Batagelj. 2018. Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Downing, J. 2019. Blurring European and Islamic values or brightening the good – bad Muslim dichotomy? A critical analysis of French Muslim victims of Jihadi terror online on twitter and in Le Monde newspaper. Critical Studies on Terrorism 12(2): 250–272. Scholar
  18. Fairclough, N. 2010. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  19. Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating Rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1): 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freedom House. 2017. Freedom on the Net 2017: Country profile France. Accessed 20 May 2019.
  21. Gardy, J., et al. 2011. Whole-genome sequencing and social-network analysis of a tuberculoisis outbreak. The New England Journal of Medicine 364: 730–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gee, J.P. 2004. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Gerbaudo, P. 2012. Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  24. Himelboim, I., M.A. Smith, L. Rainie, B. Shneiderman, and C. Espina. 2017. Classifying Twitter topic-networks using social network analysis. Social Media + Society 3(1): 2056305117691545.Google Scholar
  25. Jégo, Y. 2017. Emmanuel Macron et la reniement de la culture française. Accessed 12 Jan 2018.
  26. Kaplan, A.M., and M. Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 53: 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kress, G. 2012. Multimodal discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, ed. J.P. Gee, and M. Handford, 34–49. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Kwak, H., C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. 2010. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, 591–600. ACM.Google Scholar
  29. Loader, B.D., and D. Mercea. 2011. Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society 14(6): 757–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laurinavičius, M. 2018. A guide to the Russian tool box of election meddling: a platform to analyse the long term comprehensive strategy of malign influence. Accessed 23 May 2019.
  31. McCormick, T.H., H. Lee, N. Cesare, A. Shojaie, and E.S. Spiro. 2017. Using Twitter for demographic and social science research: Tools for data collection and processing. Social Media Research 46(3): 390–421.Google Scholar
  32. Nussbaum, E. 2017. How jokes won the election. The New Yorker, January 17 2017.
  33. Papacharissi, Z. 2016. Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society 19(3): 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pierron, M. 2017. MacronLeaks: En Marche! piraté, dénonce une “operation de destabilisation” l’express. Accessed 24 May 2019.
  35. Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak. 2001. Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and anti-semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Roberts, A. 2012. WikiLeaks: The illusion of transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences 78(1): 116–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott, J. 2017. Social network analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  38. Segerberg, A., and W.L. Bennett. 2011. Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review 14(3): 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Satter, R. 2017. Social media timeout as French election reaches final state, Associated Press. Accessed 24 May 2019.
  40. Sifry, M. 2011. WikiLeaks and the age of transparency. United States of America: Counterpoint Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, M.A., L. Rainie, B. Shneiderman, and I. Himelboim. 2014. Mapping Twitter topic networks: From polarized crowds to community clusters. Pew Research Center 20: 1–56.Google Scholar
  42. Stockdale, R., Ahmed, A., and Scheepers, H. 2012. Identifying business value from the use of social media: An Sme perspective. In PACIS 2012 Proceedings. Paper 169.
  43. Tual, M., and D. Leloup. 2017. ≪MacronLeaks≫: Les questions qui se posent après le piratage d’En marche! Accessed 10 July 2017.
  44. Vie Publique. 2017. Les règles de la compagne électorale audiovisuelle et sur internet. Accessed 24 May 2019.
  45. Wolfsfeld, G., E. Segev, and T. Sheafer. 2013. Social media and the Arab Spring: Politics comes first. The International Journal of Press/Politics 18(2): 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zappavigna, M. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web, Digital ed. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Institute, LSELondonUK
  2. 2.Newcastle Business SchoolNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations