Advertisement

French Politics

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 106–127 | Cite as

Patrimony, class, and participation: French elections (1988–2012)

  • Richard Nadeau
  • Michael S. Lewis-Beck
  • Martial Foucault
  • Bruno Jérôme
Data, Measures and Methods

Abstract

Perhaps no variable in political science has received more attention than electoral participation. Despite, or because of, the great amount of research on this topic, significant new determinants for electoral participation have not been recently forthcoming. Here we offer a significant new determinant – patrimony. For theoretical reasons, we expect a voter’s wealth portfolio to influence their turnout. We test these ideas using a battery of asset items asked in French election surveys. Our finding is that voters who possess more patrimony are more likely to vote. The strength of this patrimonial effect rivals the influence of the strongest traditional predictors, such as political interest. Finally, patrimonial effects seem able to subsume, even replace, the traditional class effects from income, occupation, and education. This pivotal empirical, as well as theoretical, role of patrimony suggests serious revision in the explanation of how socioeconomic forces shape electoral participation.

Keywords

participation patrimony income class French presidential elections 

References

  1. Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H. and Rohde, D. W. (2003) Change and Continuity in the 2000 and 2002 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  2. Althaus, S. L. (2003) Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartels, L. M. (2008) Unequal Democracy. The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berinsky, A. J. (2005) The perverse consequences of electoral reform in the United States. American Politics Research 33: 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berinsky, A. J. and Lenz, G. S. (2011) Education and political participation: Exploring the causal link. Political Behavior 33: 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blais, A. (2000) To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blais, A. (2010) Political Participation. In: L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds.) Comparing Democracies 3: Elections and Voting in the 21st Century. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Blais, A. and Dobrzynska, A. (1998) Turnout in electoral democracies. European Journal of Political Research 33: 239–261.Google Scholar
  9. Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N. and Nadeau, R. (2002) Anatomy of a Liberal Victory. Peterborough, ON: Broadview.Google Scholar
  10. Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N. and Nadeau, R. (2004) The evolving nature of non-voting: Evidence from Canada. European Journal of Political Research 39: 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brady, H. E., Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. (1995) Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review 89: 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. (1954) Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-section Data. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, No. 8.Google Scholar
  13. Cancela, J. and Geys, B. (2016) Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections. Electoral Studies 42: 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Capdevielle, J., Dupoirier, E., Grunberg, G., Schweisguth, E. and Ysmal, C. (1981) France de droite, vote à gauche. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale de Science politique.Google Scholar
  15. Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C. and Whitely, P. F. (2010) Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cross, W. (2010) Auditing Canadian Democracy. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dalton, R. J. (1996) Citizen Politics, 2nd edition. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  18. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Elections. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  19. Duca, J. V. and Saving, J. L. (2008) Stock ownership and congressional elections: The political economy of the mutual fund revolution. Economic Inquiry 46: 454–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flanigan, W. H. and Zingale, N. H. (2006) Political Behavior of the American Electorate. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
  21. Flavin, P. (2011) Income inequality and policy representation in the American States. American Politics Quarterly 40: 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foucault, M., Nadeau, R. and Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2011) La persistance de l’effet patrimoine lors des élections présidentielles françaises. Revue française de science politique 61: 659–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foucault, M., Nadeau, R. and Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2013) Economic voting: Diversity and value of wealth. Electoral Studies 32: 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fox, J. (1991) Regression Diagnostics: An Introduction. Sage University Paper on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-079. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Franklin, M. N. (1996) Electoral Participation. In: L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds.) Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 216–235.Google Scholar
  26. Franklin, M. N. (2004) Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geys, B. (2006) Rational theories of voter turnout: A review. Political Studies Review 4: 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gidengil, E., Nadeau, R., Nevitte, N. and Blais, A. (2010) Citizens. In: W. Cross (ed) Auditing Canadian Democracy. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 93–117.Google Scholar
  29. Green, D. P. and Gerber, A. S. (2008) Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  30. Greene, W. H. (2011) Econometric Analysis, 7th edition. Pearson, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Guiso, L. and Paiella, M. (2008) Risk aversion, wealth and background risk. Journal of the European Economic Association 6(6):1109–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hershey, M. R. (2005) Party Politics in America, 11th edition. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  33. Hillygus, S. D. (2005) The missing link: Exploring the relationship between education and political engagement. Political Behavior 27: 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoffmann-Martinot, V., Ralling, C. and Thrasher, M. (1996) Comparing local electoral turnout in Great-Britain and France: More similarities than differences?” European Journal of Political Research 30: 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hout, M., Brooks, C. and Manza, J. (1995) The democratic class struggle in the United States, 1948–1992. American Sociological Review 60: 805–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnston, J. (1984) Econometric Methods, 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Kam, C. D. and Palmer, C. L. (2008) Reconsidering the effects of education on political participation. Journal of Politics 70: 612–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kotlikoff, L. J. and Summers, L. (1981) The role of intergenerational transfers in aggregate capital accumulation. Journal of Political Economy 89(4): 706–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kutner, M., Nachtsaheim, C. and Neter, J. (2004) Applied Linear Regression, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  40. La Due Lake, R. and Huckfeldt, R. (1998) Social capital, social networks and political participation. Political Psychology 19: 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lancelot, A. (1968) L’abstentionnisme électoral en France. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  42. Leighley, J. E. and Nagler, J. (1992) Socioeconomic class bias in turnout, 1964–1988: The voters remain the same. American Political Science Review 86: 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Jacoby, W. G., Norpoth, H. and Weisberg, H. F. (2008) The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewis-Beck, M. S. and Nadeau, R. (2011) Economic voting theory: Testing new directions. Electoral Studies 30: 288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Nadeau, R. and Foucault, M. (2013) The compleat economic voter: New evidence from the UK. British Journal of Political Science 43: 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mayer, A. K. (2011) Does education increases political participation? Journal of Politics 73: 633–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milbrath, L. (1965) Political Participation: Why How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  48. Muxel, A. (2009) Loyautés, mobilités, abstentions. In: B. Cautrès and A. Muxel (eds) Comment les électeurs font-ils leur choix? Le Panel électoral français de 2007. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, pp. 45–75.Google Scholar
  49. Nadeau, R., Bélanger, É., Lewis-Beck, M., Cautrès, B. and Foucault, M. (2012) Les élections présidentielles. Le vote des Français de Mitterrand à Sarkozy. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  50. Nadeau, R., Bélanger, É., Lewis-Beck, M. S., Turgeon, M. and Gélineau, F. (2016) Latin American Elections: Choice and Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  51. Nadeau, R., Foucault, M. and Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2010) Patrimonial economic voting in French legislative elections. West European Politics 6: 1261–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nadeau, R., Foucault, M. and Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2011) Patrimonial economic voting: A neglected dimension. French Politics 9: 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nevitte, N., Blais, A., Gidengil, E. and Nadeau, R. (2009) Socio-economic status and non-voting. In: H.-D. Klingemann (ed) The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 85–108.Google Scholar
  54. Oppenhuis, E. (1995) Voting Behavior in Europe. A Comparative Analysis of Electoral Participation and Party Choice. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
  55. Palfrey, T. R. and Rosenthal, H. (1985) Voter participation and strategic uncertainty. American Political Science Review 79(1): 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Powell Jr., G. B. (1982) Comparing Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Powell Jr., G. B. (1986) American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review 80: 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rémond, R. (2007) Regard sur le siècle, 2e édition. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.Google Scholar
  59. Riker, W. H. and Ordeshook, P. C. (1968) A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review 62: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosenstone, S. J. and Hansen, J. M. (2003) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  61. Stockemer, D. (2016) What affects voter turnout? A review article/meta-analysis of aggregate research. Government and Opposition. doi: 10.1017/gov.2016.30.Google Scholar
  62. Stubager, R., Lewis-Beck, M. S. and Nadeau, R. (2013) Searching for the welfare state: Patrimonial economic voting in Denmark. Electoral Studies 32: 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tiexiera, R. A. (1987) Why Americans Don’t Vote: Turnout Decline in the United States, 19601984. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  64. Tiexiera, R. A. (1992) The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  65. Wolfinger, R. and Rosenstone, S. (1980) Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Nadeau
    • 1
  • Michael S. Lewis-Beck
    • 2
  • Martial Foucault
    • 3
  • Bruno Jérôme
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.CEVIPOFParisFrance
  4. 4.Université Paris IIParisFrance

Personalised recommendations