Advertisement

French Politics

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 1–26 | Cite as

Up, close and personal: the new Front National visual strategy under Marine Le Pen

  • Delia DumitrescuEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Extensive analyses of Marine Le Pen’s media interventions as leader of the French Front National have revealed mostly rhetorical differences from her father’s discourse. In particular, despite Marine Le Pen’s professed openness toward women and their policy concerns, and despite her professed intention to transform the FN into party suitable for government, there has been little progress in these directions. However, the FN’s visual discourse has been all but ignored by the scholarly analysis, despite the fact that campaign visuals encode significant social and political information. This paper finds that the FN candidates’ visual presentation has undergone major transformations from the 2007 to the 2012 legislative elections. Specifically FN candidates in 2012 are more likely to visually portray themselves like mainstream party candidates. Compared to the 2007 elections, women candidates, in particular, were more likely to visually promote their personal qualities in 2012, in some respects more than 2012 men candidates.

Keywords

France Front National visual strategy Le Pen election 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank two anonymous referees for excellent feedback, Michael Lewis-Beck and Nonna Mayer for constructive discussions on this topic, as well as Odile Gaultier-Voituriez at CEVIPOF for assistance with the data collection.

References

  1. Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L. and Glasgow, G. (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alduy, C. and Wahnich, S. (2015) Marine Le Pen prise aux mots: décryptage du nouveau discours frontiste. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., et al. (2015) 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey.Google Scholar
  4. Bakker, R., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., et al. (2015) Measuring party positions in Europe The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics 21(1): 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, A.W. and Barrington, L.W. (2005) Is a picture worth a thousand words? Newspaper photographs and voter evaluations of political candidates. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 10(4): 98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carey, J.M. and Shugart, M.S. (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crépon, S. (2012) Enquête au cœur du nouveau Front national. Paris: Nouveau Monde éditions.Google Scholar
  8. Crépon, S. (2015) Chapitre 8/La politique des mœurs au Front National. In Crépon, S., Dézé, A. and Mayer, N. (Eds). Les faux-semblants du Front national: Sociologie d’un parti politique. (pp. 185–206). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  9. Crépon, S., Dézé, A. and Mayer, N. (2015) Conclusion/Quelles perspectives pour le Front National? In Crépon, S., Dézé, A. and Mayer, N. (Eds). Les faux-semblants du Front national: Sociologie d’un parti politique (pp. 529–606). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  10. Dézé, A. (2012) Le Front national: à la conquête du pouvoir?. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  11. Dumitrescu, D. (2009) Spatial visual communications in election campaigns: Political posters strategies in two democracies (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).Google Scholar
  12. Dumitrescu, D. (2010) Know me, love me, fear me: The anatomy of candidate poster designs in the 2007 French legislative elections. Political Communication 27(1): 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dumitrescu, D. (forthcoming) Nonverbal communication in politics: A review of research developments, 2005–2015. American Behavioral Scientist. Google Scholar
  14. Elgie, R. (2005) France: Stacking the deck. In M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell (Eds.), The politics of electoral systems (pp. 119–137). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ezrow, L. (2008) Research note: On the inverse relationship between votes and proximity for niche parties. European Journal of Political Research 47(2): 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fourest, C. and Venner, F. (2012) Marine Le Pen démasquée. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
  17. Gallop, M. and Weschle, S. (2014) Assessing the Impact of Non-Random Measurement Error on Inference: A Sensitivity Analysis Approach. Working paper, Duke University. Available at http://people.duke.edu/sww7/papers/Measurement_Error_2014.pdf.
  18. Gaultier, J.P. (2015) De Le Pen à Le Pen continuités et ruptures. Paris: Éditions Syllepse.Google Scholar
  19. Goldhammer, A. (2015) Explaining the Rise of the Front national: Political Rhetoric or Cultural Insecurity? French Politics, Culture & Society 33(2): 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grabe, M.E. and Bucy, E.P. (2009) Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, C.C., Goren, A., Chaiken, S. and Todorov, A. (2009) Shallow cues with deep effects: Trait judgments from faces and voting decisions. In: Borgida, E., Federico, C. and Sullivan, J. (Eds.), The Political Psychology of Democratic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hooghe, L., Bakker, R., Brigevich, A., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., Marks, G., et al. (2010) Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning. European Journal of Political Research 49(5): 687–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ivaldi, G. (2015) Chapitre 7/Du néolibéralisme au social-populisme? In Crépon, S., Dézé, A. and Mayer, N. (Eds). Les faux-semblants du Front national: Sociologie d’un parti politique. (pp. 161–184). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  24. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kreuzer, M. (2000) Electoral mechanisms and electioneering incentives: Vote getting strategies of Japanese, French, British, German and Austrian conservatives. Party Politics 6: 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kreuzer, M. and Stephan, I. (2003) France: Enduring notables, weak parties and powerful technocrats. In: J. Borchert and J. Zeiss (Eds.), The Political Class in Advanced Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayer, N. (2015) Chapitre 13/Le plafond de verre électoral entamé, mais pas brisé. In Crépon, S., Dézé, A. and Mayer, N. (Eds). Les faux-semblants du Front national: Sociologie d’un parti politique. (pp. 297–322). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenberg, S.W., Bohan, L., McCafferty, P. and Harris, K. (1986) The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference. American Journal of Political Science 108–127.Google Scholar
  29. Rosenberg, S.W., Kahn, S. and Tran, T. (1991) Creating a political image: Shaping appearance and manipulating the vote. Political Behavior 13(4): 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steenbergen, M.R. and Marks, G. (2007) Evaluating expert judgments. European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stewart, P.A., Waller, B.M. and Schubert, J.N. (2009) Presidential speechmaking style: Emotional response to micro-expressions of facial affect. Motivation and Emotion 33(2): 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swigger, N. (2012) What You See Is What You Get: Drawing Inferences From Campaign Imagery. Political Communication 29(4): 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taguieff, P.A. (1996) Un programme révolutionnaire? In Mayer, N. and Perrineau, P. (Eds.). Le Front national à découvert (pp. 195–227). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication StudiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations