Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Explaining MPs’ constituency service in multilevel systems: the case of Belgium

  • Original Article
  • Published:
French Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

Political representation – the core of modern democracies – essentially refers to a relationship between a representative and those represented by him or her. Therefore, the linkage between citizens and political decision makers is one of the most important topics in the study of democratic political systems. However, the literature on parliamentary systems has concentrated on what MPs do inside parliament on the one hand and on the impact of the electoral system on MPs’ behavior on the other hand. This aim of this article is twofold. First, it provides a more comprehensive description of the activities of Belgian MPs on the basis of a mixed-method approach, using data from a survey, interviews as well as field observations. Second, it addresses four other factors that could have an influence on MPs relations to the district, besides the electoral system: the level at which they are elected (regional vs. federal), the accumulation of mandates, the distinction between older and newer parties, and MPs seniority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • André, A., Bradbury, J. and Depauw, S. (2014) “Constituency service in Multi-level democracies”, Regional and Federal Studies, 24(2): 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André, A. and Depauw, S. (2013a) “Electoral Competition and the Constituent-Representative Relationship”, World Political Science Review, 9(1): 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, A. and Depauw, S. (2013b) “District Magnitude and Home Styles of Representation in European Democracies”, West European Politics, 36(5): 986–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André, A., Depauw, S. and Sandri, G. (2013a) “Belgian Affairs and constituent preferences for ‘good constituency members’”, Acta Politica 48: 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André, A., Freire, A. and Papp, Z. (2013b) “Electoral Rules and Legislators Vote-Seeking”, in Deschouwer, K., Depauw, S. (eds), Representing the People, Oxford, Oxford University Press: 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, A., Gallagher, M. and Sandri, G. (2013c) “Legislators’ constituency orientation”, in Deschouwer, K., Depauw, S. (eds), Representing the People, Oxford, Oxford University Press: 166–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, A., Depauw, S., Shugart, M. (2013d) “The effect of electoral institutions on legislative behaviour”, in Martin, S., Saalfeld, T., Strom, K. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, Oxford, Oxford University Press: 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, H. and Cotta, M. (2000) Parliamentary representatives in Europe, 1848–2000: legislative recruitment and careers in eleven European countries, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomgren, M. and Rozenberg, O. (2012) Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S. and Farrell, D. (1993) “Legislator Shirking and Voter Monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon Legislator-Voter Relationships”, Journal of Common Market Studies 31(1): 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. and Mitchell, J. (2007). “The Constituency work of members of the Scottish Parliament and National Assembly of Wales: Approaches, relationships and rules”, Regional and Federal Studies, 17 (1): 117–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuninger, T., Brunner, M. and Däubler, T. (2012) “Personal Vote-seeking in flexible list systems: how electoral incentives shape Belgian MPs’ bill initiation behaviour”, European Journal of Political Research 51: 607–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, V. J. and Cain, B. E. (1990) “British MPs in their constituencies”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15 (1): 127–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, B. E., Ferejohn, J. A. and Fiorina, M. P. (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. and Shugart, M. (1995) “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas”, Electoral Studies, 14(4): 417–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, C. (2006) “Public Preferences for Parliamentary Representation in the UK: An Overlooked Link?”, Political Studies, 54(1): 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, O. and Kerrouche, E. (2007) Qui sont les députés français? Enquête sur des élites inconnues, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2003) “The lonely citizen: Indirect representation in an age of networks”, Political Communication, 22(1).

  • Dahl, R. (1994) “Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation”, Political Science Quarterly, 101(1): 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. H. (1969) The Role of the Congressman, New York, Pegasus.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winter, L. (1997) “Intra and Extra-parliamentary Role attitudes and Behaviour of Belgian MPs”, Journal of Legislative Studies, 3(1): 128–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Winter, L. and Baudewijns, P. (2014) “Candidate-centred campaigning in a party-centred context. The case of Belgium”, Electoral Studies, forthcoming.

  • Deschouwer, K. (2010) “Political representation at multiple levels: Is there a regional style of representation?”, paper presented at the APSA annual Meeting, Washington DC.

  • Eulau, H. and Karps, P. (1977) “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2(3): 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. (1977) “U.S. House Members in their Constituencies: An Exploration”, American Political Science Review, 71 (4): 883–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. (1978) Home Style: House Members in their Districts, Boston, Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • François, A. and Navarro, J. (2013) Le cumul des mandats en France. Causes et conséquences. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitshusen, S., Young, G. and Wood, D. (2005) “Electoral Context and MP constituency focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and United Kingdom”, American Journal of Political Science, 49(1): 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, M. (1983) “Legislator-Constituency Relations and the Representative Process”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8(3): 303–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrouche, E. (2004) “Appréhender le rôle des parlementaires: études comparatives de recherches menées et perspectives”, in O. Costa, E. Kerrouche and P. Magnette (eds), Vers un renouveau du parlementarisme en Europe?, Brussels, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles: 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (ed.) (1981), Conflict and Coexistence in Belgium. The Dynamics of a Culturally Divided Society, Berkeley, Institute of International Studies, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (2014) “Why electoral systems don’t always matter: The impact of ‘mega-seats’ on legislative behavior in Ireland”, Party Politics, 20(3):467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D. R. (1974) Congress, The Electoral Connection, New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P. (2000) “Voters and their representatives: Electoral institutions and delegation in parliamentary democracies”, European Journal of Political Research, 37(3):335–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mughan, A., Box-Steffenmeier, J. and Scully, R. (1997) “Mapping Legislative socialization”, European Journal of Political Research, 32(1): 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nay, O. (2002), “Le jeu du compromis. Les élus régionaux entre territoire et pratiques d’assemblée”, in O. Nay, A. Smith (eds), Le gouvernement du compromis, courtiers et généralistes de l’action politique, Paris, Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (1997) “The Puzzle of Constituency Service”, Journal of Legislative Studies 3(2): 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. (2002) Parliaments in Contemporary Western Europe, London, Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. and Wood, D. (1993) Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and their Constituents, Lexington, University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzelt, W. J. (2007) The Constituency Roles of MPs at the Federal and La¨nder Levels in Germany, Regional & Federal Studies, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. (1967) The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilet, J-B., Freire, A. and Costa, O. (2012) “Ballot structure, district magnitude and constituency orientation of MPs in Proportional Representation and Majority Electoral Systems”, Representation 48(4): 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilet, Jean-Benoit (2013) “Le cumul des mandats en Belgique”, In: François Abel and Navarro Julien (2013). Le cumul des mandats en France. Causes et conséquences. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, pp. 81–97.

  • Russell, M. and Bradbury, J. (2007) The Constituency Work of Scottish and Welsh MPs: Adjusting to Devolution, Regional & Federal Studies, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, D. (2013) “The Exceptional First Term? – Seniority Effects for German MPs’ District Activities”, ECPR General Conference, Bordeaux.

  • Scully, R. and Farrell D. (2001) “Understanding Constituency Representation in the European Parliament”, paper presented at the ECSA meeting.

  • Searing, D. (1994) Westminster’s World. Understanding Political Roles, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S., Stokes, E., Wood, J. and Kirshner, A. (2010) Political Representation, New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shomer, Y. (2009) “Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking Behavior”, Comparative Political Studies, 42(7): 945–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, M., Valdini, M. and Suominen, K. (2005) “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal voter-earning attributes to Legislators Under Proportional Representation”, American Journal of Political Science, 49 (2): 437–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studlar, D. T., McAllister, I., “Constituency Activity and Representational Roles Among Australian Legislators”, The Journal of Politics, vol.58, n°1, 1996, pp. 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavits, M. (2010) “The effect of local ties on electoral success and parliamentary behavior: the case of Estonia”, Party Politics, 16: 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M., Zittel, T. (2008), “Comparative Legislative Behaviour” in Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, S., Rockman, B., The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 455–473.

  • Van Haute, E. and Depauw, S. (2010) “Les préférences des citoyens en termes de représentation politique» in Deschouwer, Kris, Delwit, Pascal, Hooghe, Marc & Walgrave, Stefaan (eds), Les voix du peuple. Le comportement électoral au scrutin du 10 juin 2009, Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, pp. 177–198.

  • Walczak, A., van der Brug, W. (2013) “Representation in the European Parliament: Factors affecting the attitude congruence of voters and candidates in the EP elections”, European Union Politics, 14(1): 3-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, B. (1999) “Whom to Represent? Role Orientations of Legislators in Europe” in H. Schmitt and J. Thomassen, Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Nathalie Brack acknowledges the financial support of the FRS-FNRS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cevipol, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Nathalie Brack & Jean-Benoit Pilet

Authors
  1. Nathalie Brack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Benoit Pilet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie Brack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brack, N., Pilet, JB. Explaining MPs’ constituency service in multilevel systems: the case of Belgium. Fr Polit 14, 439–468 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-016-0011-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-016-0011-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation