Business Economics

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 129–137 | Cite as

The overselling of globalization

  • Joseph E. StiglitzEmail author


Globalization was oversold. Politicians and some economists wrongly argued for trade agreements on the basis of job creation. The gains to GDP or growth were overestimated, and the costs, including adverse distributional effects, were underestimated. There have been important political consequences of this overselling, including the undermining of confidence in the elites that advocated globalization. The failures of globalization and the misguided backlash against it contain many lessons: about the importance of science and learning in society, the importance of the shared acceptance of facts, the dangerous consequences of deliberately misinforming the public, and the folly of ignoring the distributional consequences of economic forces just because they may lead to growth. The new protectionism advocated by the administration of Donald Trump will only worsen the plight of those already hurt by globalization. What is needed is a comprehensive system of social protection. After cataloguing the failures of globalization and explaining how they led to our current political mire, this paper outlines a set of policies that could put the economy and our politics back on a better path.


Globalization Protectionism Trade agreements 


  1. Akerlof, George A., and Robert J. Shiller. 2015. Phishing for phools: The economics of manipulation and deception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dasgupta, Partha, and Joseph Stiglitz. 1977. Tariffs vs. quotas as revenue raising devices under uncertainty. American Economic Review 67 (5): 975–981.Google Scholar
  3. Greenwald, Bruce, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 2010. A modest proposal for international monetary reform. In Time for a visible hand: Lessons from the 2008 World Financial Crisis, ed. S. Griffith-Jones, J.A. Ocampo, and J.E. Stiglitz, 314–344., Initiative for policy dialogue series Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Keynes, J.M. 1942–1943. The Keynes Plan. Reproduced in The International Monetary Fund 19451965: Twenty Years of International Monetary Cooperation, Vol. III: Documents, ed. J. Keith Horsefield, 3–36. Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. Newbery, David M.G., and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 1984. Pareto inferior trade. Review of Economic Studies 51 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Samuelson, Paul A. 1938. Welfare economics and international trade. American Economic Review 28 (2): 261–266.Google Scholar
  7. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2002. Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2006. Making globalization work. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2015. Rewriting the rules of the American Economy: An agenda for growth and shared prosperity. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2016. The euro: How a common currency threatens the future of Europe. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2017. Macro-economic management in an electronic credit/financial system. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 23032, January.Google Scholar
  12. Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Bruce Greenwald. 2010. Towards a new global reserve system. Journal of Globalization and Development 1 (2), Article 10.Google Scholar
  13. Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Bruce Greenwald. 2014. Creating a learning society: A new approach to growth, development, and social progress. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Mary Kaldor (eds.). 2013. The quest for security: Protection without protectionism and the challenge of global governance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2003. Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review 93 (2): 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Association for Business Economics 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations