Skip to main content

Towards A Psychoanalytic Understanding Of War

Abstract

Inspired by the Horneyan concept of a morality of evolution and applying the psychoanalytic method, I researched a body of scientific literature to understand the status of our society today. History, linked to natural history, is the narrative of my patient, the human species. I endeavored to find if there was a repressed trauma in the history of humanity that could explain the symptomatic, recurrent phenomenon of war. In Einstein’s terms, we all condemn war and yet, paradoxically, we engage in it again and again allowing might to supersede right. I found, first, that war is not a natural but a purely historical phenomenon; second, that psychoanalysis is a qualified method to understand the phenomenon of war; and third, that, in the history of subjectivity, the slavery of women who had led the species for two-hundred-thousand years before and were then deprived of their transcendence in civil society, offered an answer to the puzzle. Most remarkable is the fact that academia has repeatedly ignored the issue when evidence is presented. I arrived at the conclusion that true gender parity in any society offers a model for substantive equality and space for peaceful expression of our inevitable differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Aristotle. (350 BCE). The Nicomachean ethics of Aristotle. W. D. Ross (Trans.). Seattle, WA: Pacific Publishing Studio. 2011.

  • Bachofen, J. J. (1967). Myth, religion, and mother right: Selected writings of J. J. Bachofen. R. Manheim (Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Volume I. Attachment. London: Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psychoanalysis.

  • Briffault, R. (1927). The mothers: A study of the origins of the sentiments and institutions. Vols. 1–3. London & New York: Macmillan.

  • Cai, H. (1997). Une société sans père ni mari. Les Na de Chine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. In English: Society without fathers or husbands. The Na of China. Trans. Asti Hustvedt. N. Y.: Zone Books. 2001.

  • Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species. New York: Simon & Schuster. 2008.

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1949). The second sex. New York: Random House. 2011.

  • Einstein, A., & Freud, S. (1932). The Einstein-Freud Correspondence. Why War? (July 1932 & September 1932). Standard Edition, Vol. 22, (pp. 197–218). London: Hogarth.

  • Engels, F. (1884). Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staats. [The origins of the family, private property and the state]. In English: London: Lawrence & Wishart. 1970.

  • Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the witch. Women, the body and primitive accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1929). The unwelcome child and his death instinct. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (pp. 102–106). London: Karnac Books. 1994.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1932). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint & N.Z. Jackson (Trans.). Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press. 1988.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child. The language of tenderness and of passion. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. (pp. 156–167). London: Karnac Books. 1994. Also in International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, 225–230. 1949.

  • Fox, J. (2013). “Alternatives” isn’t a dirty economic word. Harvard Business Review, August 1, 2013.

  • Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Standard Edition, Vol. 7 (pp. 135–243). London: Hogarth.

  • Freud, S. (1912–1913). Totem and taboo. Standard Edition, Vol. 13 (pp. 1–161). London: Hogarth.

  • Freud, S. (1915). Instincts and their vicissitudes. Standard Edition, Vol. 14 (pp. 117–140). London: Hogarth.

  • Freud, S. (1925). Some psychical consequences of anatomic distinction between the sexes. Standard Edition, Vol. 19 (pp. 241–258). London: Hogarth.

  • Fromm, E. (1991). The sane society. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. H. P. A. (1894). Die systematische Phylogenie [Systematic phylogeny] Berlin: Verlag von Georg Reimer.

  • Hoffer, A. (1991). The Freud-Ferenczi controversy–A living legacy. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 18, 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1926). The flight from womanhood. The masculinity complex in women as viewed by men and women. In Feminine psychology. H. Kelman, Ed. and Introduction (pp. 54–70). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. 1967.

  • Horney, K. (1939). New ways in psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1945). Our inner conflicts. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K (1950). Neurosis and human growth. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1993). Sexes and genealogies. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1923). The development of a child. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 4, 419–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, C. (1991). Blood relations. Menstruation and the origins of culture. New York and London. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, C., Power, C., & Watts, I. (1995). The human symbolic revolution: A Darwinian account. Cambridge Archeological Journal, 5(1), 75–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1984). Revolution in poetic language. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafitau, J. F. (1724). Customs of the American Indians compared with the customs of primitive times. 2 vols. W. Fenton and E. Moore (Trans.). Toronto: The Champlain Society. 1974.

  • Leacock, E. (2008). Myths of male dominance. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1949). Les structures élémentaires de la parenté [The elementary structures of kinship]. In English: London: Eyre & Spottiswood. 1967.

  • MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

  • Mark, J. (2007). Long shadow of Linnaeus’s human taxonomy. Nature, 447, 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient society or researches [sic] in the lines of human progress from savagery through barbarism to civilization. London: Macmillan. 1944.

  • Rank, O. (1924). The trauma of birth. New York: R. Brunner. 1952.

  • Reich, W. (1933). Character analysis. Third, enlarged edition. M. Higgins & C. M. Raphael (Eds.), V.R. Carfagno (new trans.) New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 1972. Full text available from the Wilhelm Reich Infant Trust. Accessed from http://www.wilhelmreichtrust.org/charac-ter_analysis.pdf.

  • Rendón, M. (1979). Discussion of “Horney's theory of neurosis: A developmental-structuralist interpretation.” American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 37–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendón, M. (1984). Karen Horney's biocultural dialectic. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 44, 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendón, M. (2018). Why war? Making sense of consciousness and self. New York: IPBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendón, M. (2020). The morality of evolution and a return to subjectivity. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 80, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L. (1993). Why mammals are called mammals: Gender politics in Eighteen-Century natural history. American Historical Review, 98, 382-411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origins of the self. The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, G. (1997). For-giving: A feminist criticism of exchange. Austin, Texas: Plainview Press in collaboration with the Foundation for a Compassionate Society (Ch. 1., p. 15).

  • Westermarck, E. (1889). The history of human marriage. 3 vols. London: Macmillan.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Rendón.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mario Rendón, MD, Training and Supervising Analyst, American Institute for Psychoanalysis and the Centro Psicoanalítico de Madrid; Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, New York Medical College; Former Director of the Department of Psychiatry, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center; Former Editor, American Journal of Psychoanalysis.

* This paper was given at the virtual conference “In the Time of War” of the American Journal of Psychoanalysis/Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis, on April 10, 2022, in response to the war in Ukraine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rendón, M. Towards A Psychoanalytic Understanding Of War. Am J Psychoanal 82, 177–188 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-022-09352-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-022-09352-z

Keywords

  • war
  • psychoanalysis
  • instinctual disposition
  • trauma
  • patriarchal coup
  • repression
  • gender parity