Vera, a middle-aged, bright and skillful mental health professional, consistently maintained throughout the first years of her analysis that she had no imagination and, indeed, exhibited during the early years of work a limited, stunted capacity for truly abstract symbolic thinking, emotional expression and playfulness. I report developments within the fourth year of Vera’s psychoanalysis, currently in its eighth year, during which Vera spontaneously began to draw objects, at first copying and eventually drawing from imagination. For a time, Vera was critical of her work, which was actually quite good, and experienced great difficulty acknowledging and appreciating the many internal dimensions and interests that her work revealed. This watershed development required an equally gradual “interpretive welcoming” on the analyst’s part so as to contain Vera’s transition from preoccupation with concrete, technical aspects of her drawings toward a more mature thirst for the aesthetic, symbolism and play. At some point, analysand and analyst began to play with cognate associations surrounding the Hebrew word for art—o’ma‘nut—combined with the image of the nursing mother (o’me‘net), and fidelity, trust and faith (e’mu‘nah). This creative countertransference enactment eloquently reflected the spectrum of shared transformative aesthetic-imaginative processes within both analytic partners, or the emergence of the dyadic psychoanalytic artist. Discussion elucidates what has been achieved and what remains to be achieved.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abram, J. (2012). Book Review. On Not Being Able to Paint (1950) and The Hands of the Living God (1969) by Marion Milner. International Universities Press, Madison, CT, 1950, 1969. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 93, 1340–1347.
Adamo, S. M. (2012). The aesthetic experience in the process of recovery from autistic states. Journal of Child Psychotherapy,38, 61–77.
Amati-Mehler, J., Argentieri, S., & Canestri, J. (1990). The Babel of the unconscious: Mother tongue and foreign languages in the psychoanalytic dimension (J. Whitelaw-Cucco, Trans.). Madison, CT: International Universities Press. 1993.
Andresen, J. J. (1996). An origin of the inhibition of imagination. Contemporary Psychoanalysis,3, 307–326.
Bachelard, G. (1937). The poetics of space. Boston: Beacon Press. 1964.
Bass, A. (2007). The as-if patient and the as-if analyst. Psychoanalytic Quarterly,76, 365–386.
Ben-Yehudah, E. (1960). A complete dictionary and thesaurus of ancient and modern Hebrew (Vol. 1). London: Thomas Yoseloff.
Bergstein, A. (2011). The painful vicissitudes of the patient’s love: Transference-love and the aesthetic conflict. Contemporary Psychoanalysis,47, 224–244.
Bion, W. R. (1962). A psycho-analytical study of thinking. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis,43, 306–310.
Bion, W. R. (1967). Second thoughts: Selected papers on psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
Bollas, C. (1992). Psychic genera. In Being a character: Psychoanalysis and self experience (pp. 66–100). London: Routledge.
Botella, C., & Botella, S. (2013). Psychic figurability and unrepresented states. In H. B. Levine, G. S. Reed, & D. Scarfone (Eds.), Unrepresented states and the construction of meaning: Clinical and theoretical contributions (pp. 95–121). London: Karnac.
Bronowski, J. (1964). The imaginative mind in art. In P. E. Ariotti & R. Bronowski (Eds.), Being a character: Psychoanalysis and self experience (pp. 6–19). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1978.
Casement, P. (2019). Learning along the way: Further reflections on psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Castoriadis, C. (1975). The imaginary institution of society (K. Blamey, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1987.
Castoriadis, C. (1986). The discovery of the imagination. In World in fragments: Writings on politics, society, psychoanalysis and the imagination. D. A. Curtis (Ed. & Trans.). (pp. 213–45) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.
Castoriadis, C. (1992). Logic, imagination, reflection. In World in fragments: Writings on politics, society, psychoanalysis and the imagination. D. A. Curtis (Ed. & Trans.). (pp. 246–72) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.
Charles, M. (2012). Rediscovering the enduring power of Marion Milner’s work. Essay review of five works by Marion Milner: A Life of One’s Own (1936); An Experiment in Leisure (1937); On Not Being Able to Paint (1957); The Hands of the Living God: An Account of a Psycho-analytic Treatment (1969); and Eternity’s Sunrise: A Way of Keeping a Diary (1987). American Journal of Psychoanalysis,72, 287–304.
Civitarese, G. (2018). Sublime subjects: Aesthetic experience and intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
Cooper, S. H. (2008). Privacy, reverie, and the analyst’s ethical imagination. Psychoanalytic Quarterly,77(4), 1045–1073.
Eekhoff, J. K. (2013). Infantile trauma, traumatic impasses and recovery. American Journal of Psychoanalysis,73, 353–369.
Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art: A study in the psychology of artistic imagination. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Faranda, F. (2016). Image and imagination: Deepening our experience of the mind. Psychoanalytic Inquiry,36, 603–612.
Feldman, B. (2004). A skin for the imaginal. Journal of Analytical Psychology,49(3), 285–311.
Ferenczi, S. (1932). The Clinical Diary of Sándor Ferenczi (J. Dupont, Ed., M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.) Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press. 1988.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality (Standard ed., Vol. 7, pp. 135–243). London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1924). The loss of reality in neurosis and psychosis (Standard ed., Vol. 19, pp. 181–188). London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1925). Negation (Standard ed., Vol. 19, pp. 235–230). London: Hogarth.
Glover, N. (1998). Psychoanalytic aesthetics: An introduction to the British School. London: Karnac. 2009.
Green, A. (1993). The work of the negative (A. Weller, Trans.). London: Free Association Press. 1999.
Hagman, G. (2005). Aesthetic experience: Beauty, creativity and the search for the ideal. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kant, I. (1787). The critique of pure reason (F. M. Miller, Trans.). New York: Anchor. 1966.
Klein, M. (1929). Infantile anxiety-situations reflected in a work of art and in the creative impulse. In Love, guilt and reparation, and other works 1921–1945 (pp. 210–218). London: Virago. 1975.
Kojève, A. (1939). Introduction to the work of Hegel (J. Nichols Jr., Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
Kurosawa, A. (Director); Nagata, M., & Jingo, M. (Producers). (1950). Rashomon [Motion Picture]. Tokyo: Diaei Studios. Japan.
Lacan, J. (1977). Écrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Tavistock.
Lavallée, G. (2003). L’enveloppe visuelle du moi et l’hallucinatoire [The visual envelope of the ego and the hallucination ]. Cahiers de Psychologic Clinique,20, 57–87.
Levine, H. B. (2013). The colourless canvas: Representation, therapeutic action, and the creation of mind. In H. B. Levine, G. S. Reed, & D. Scarfone (Eds.), Unrepresented states and the construction of meaning: Clinical and theoretical contributions (pp. 42–71). London: Karnac.
Likierman, M. (1989). Clinical significance of aesthetic experience. International Review of Psycho-Analysis,16, 133–150.
Lothane, Z. (2007). Imagination as reciprocal process and its role in the psychoanalytic situation. International Forum of Psychoanalysis,16, 152–163.
Mayes, L. C., & Cohen, D. J. (1992). The development of a capacity for imagination in early childhood. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child,47, 23–47.
Meltzer, D. (1987). On aesthetic reciprocity. Journal of Child Psychotherapy,13, 3–14.
Meltzer, D., & Harris Williams, M. (1988). The apprehension of beauty: The role of aesthetic conflict in development, art, and violence. London: Karnac.
Milner, M. (pseudon., Field, J.) (1950). On not being able to paint. Madison, CT: International Universities Press. 1956.
Milner, M. (1952). The framed gap. In The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis (pp. 79–82). London and New York: Routledge. 1987.
Milner, M. (1957). The ordering of chaos. In The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis (pp. 216–233). London and New York: Routledge.
Milner, M, (1969). The hands of the living god: An account of a psychoanalytic treatment. London: Routledge. 2011.
Milner, M. (1987). The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge.
Mitrani, J. L. (1998). Unbearable ecstasy, reverence and awe, and the perpetuation of an “aesthetic conflict.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly,67, 102–127.
Olsen, O. A. (2004). Depression and reparation as themes in Melanie Klein’s analysis of the painter Ruth Weber. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review,27, 34–42.
Rodman, F. R. (2002). The psychoanalytic imagination. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis,11(3), 419–440.
Salomonsson, B. (2006). The aesthetic dimension of the psychoanalytic process. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review,29(1), 2–12.
Sartre, J.P. (1940). The imaginary: A phenomenological psychology of the imagination (J. Webber, Trans.). London: Routledge. 2004.
Schaverien, J. (2007). Countertransference as active imagination: Imaginative experiences of the analyst. Journal of Analytic Psychology,52, 413–431.
Torsti, M. (2000). At the sources of the symbolization process. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child,55, 275–297.
Townsend, P. (2014). A life of its own: The relationship between artist, idea and artwork. Free Associations,15, 99–119.
Ver Eecke, W. (2006). Denial, negation, and the forces of the negative. Freud, Hegel, Lacan, Spitz, and Sophocles. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Williams, A. (2000). Reflections on “aesthetic reciprocity.” In M. Cohen & A. Hahn (Eds.), Exploring the work of Donald Meltzer: A Festschrift (pp. 136–152). London: Karnac.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 179–192). London: Karnac.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Moshe Halevi Spero, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology, Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan; Director, Postgraduate Program of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, Bar-Ilan University, Israel; Editor-in-Chief, Ma’arag: The Israel Annual of Psychoanalysis; clinical and supervisory practice, Efrata-Gush Etzyon, Israel.
About this article
Cite this article
Spero, M.H. ON BEING ABLE TO PAINT: THE REVIVAL OF AESTHETIC IMAGINATION THROUGH THE ‘DYADIC PSYCHOANALYTIC ARTIST’. Am J Psychoanal 80, 151–175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-020-09249-9
- aesthetic conflict
- dyadic psychoanalytic artist
- Hebrew language
- magical thought