ON BEING ABLE TO PAINT: THE REVIVAL OF AESTHETIC IMAGINATION THROUGH THE ‘DYADIC PSYCHOANALYTIC ARTIST’

Abstract

Vera, a middle-aged, bright and skillful mental health professional, consistently maintained throughout the first years of her analysis that she had no imagination and, indeed, exhibited during the early years of work a limited, stunted capacity for truly abstract symbolic thinking, emotional expression and playfulness. I report developments within the fourth year of Vera’s psychoanalysis, currently in its eighth year, during which Vera spontaneously began to draw objects, at first copying and eventually drawing from imagination. For a time, Vera was critical of her work, which was actually quite good, and experienced great difficulty acknowledging and appreciating the many internal dimensions and interests that her work revealed. This watershed development required an equally gradual “interpretive welcoming” on the analyst’s part so as to contain Vera’s transition from preoccupation with concrete, technical aspects of her drawings toward a more mature thirst for the aesthetic, symbolism and play. At some point, analysand and analyst began to play with cognate associations surrounding the Hebrew word for arto’ma‘nut—combined with the image of the nursing mother (o’me‘net), and fidelity, trust and faith (e’mu‘nah). This creative countertransference enactment eloquently reflected the spectrum of shared transformative aesthetic-imaginative processes within both analytic partners, or the emergence of the dyadic psychoanalytic artist. Discussion elucidates what has been achieved and what remains to be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Abram, J. (2012). Book Review. On Not Being Able to Paint (1950) and The Hands of the Living God (1969) by Marion Milner. International Universities Press, Madison, CT, 1950, 1969. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 93, 1340–1347.

  2. Adamo, S. M. (2012). The aesthetic experience in the process of recovery from autistic states. Journal of Child Psychotherapy,38, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amati-Mehler, J., Argentieri, S., & Canestri, J. (1990). The Babel of the unconscious: Mother tongue and foreign languages in the psychoanalytic dimension (J. Whitelaw-Cucco, Trans.). Madison, CT: International Universities Press. 1993.

  4. Andresen, J. J. (1996). An origin of the inhibition of imagination. Contemporary Psychoanalysis,3, 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachelard, G. (1937). The poetics of space. Boston: Beacon Press. 1964.

  6. Bass, A. (2007). The as-if patient and the as-if analyst. Psychoanalytic Quarterly,76, 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ben-Yehudah, E. (1960). A complete dictionary and thesaurus of ancient and modern Hebrew (Vol. 1). London: Thomas Yoseloff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bergstein, A. (2011). The painful vicissitudes of the patient’s love: Transference-love and the aesthetic conflict. Contemporary Psychoanalysis,47, 224–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bion, W. R. (1962). A psycho-analytical study of thinking. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis,43, 306–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bion, W. R. (1967). Second thoughts: Selected papers on psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bollas, C. (1992). Psychic genera. In Being a character: Psychoanalysis and self experience (pp. 66–100). London: Routledge.

  12. Botella, C., & Botella, S. (2013). Psychic figurability and unrepresented states. In H. B. Levine, G. S. Reed, & D. Scarfone (Eds.), Unrepresented states and the construction of meaning: Clinical and theoretical contributions (pp. 95–121). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bronowski, J. (1964). The imaginative mind in art. In P. E. Ariotti & R. Bronowski (Eds.), Being a character: Psychoanalysis and self experience (pp. 6–19). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1978.

  14. Casement, P. (2019). Learning along the way: Further reflections on psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Castoriadis, C. (1975). The imaginary institution of society (K. Blamey, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1987.

  16. Castoriadis, C. (1986). The discovery of the imagination. In World in fragments: Writings on politics, society, psychoanalysis and the imagination. D. A. Curtis (Ed. & Trans.). (pp. 213–45) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.

  17. Castoriadis, C. (1992). Logic, imagination, reflection. In World in fragments: Writings on politics, society, psychoanalysis and the imagination. D. A. Curtis (Ed. & Trans.). (pp. 246–72) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.

  18. Charles, M. (2012). Rediscovering the enduring power of Marion Milner’s work. Essay review of five works by Marion Milner: A Life of One’s Own (1936); An Experiment in Leisure (1937); On Not Being Able to Paint (1957); The Hands of the Living God: An Account of a Psycho-analytic Treatment (1969); and Eternity’s Sunrise: A Way of Keeping a Diary (1987). American Journal of Psychoanalysis,72, 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Civitarese, G. (2018). Sublime subjects: Aesthetic experience and intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cooper, S. H. (2008). Privacy, reverie, and the analyst’s ethical imagination. Psychoanalytic Quarterly,77(4), 1045–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eekhoff, J. K. (2013). Infantile trauma, traumatic impasses and recovery. American Journal of Psychoanalysis,73, 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art: A study in the psychology of artistic imagination. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Faranda, F. (2016). Image and imagination: Deepening our experience of the mind. Psychoanalytic Inquiry,36, 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feldman, B. (2004). A skin for the imaginal. Journal of Analytical Psychology,49(3), 285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferenczi, S. (1932). The Clinical Diary of Sándor Ferenczi (J. Dupont, Ed., M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.) Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press. 1988.

  26. Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality (Standard ed., Vol. 7, pp. 135–243). London: Hogarth.

  27. Freud, S. (1924). The loss of reality in neurosis and psychosis (Standard ed., Vol. 19, pp. 181–188). London: Hogarth.

  28. Freud, S. (1925). Negation (Standard ed., Vol. 19, pp. 235–230). London: Hogarth.

  29. Glover, N. (1998). Psychoanalytic aesthetics: An introduction to the British School. London: Karnac. 2009.

  30. Green, A. (1993). The work of the negative (A. Weller, Trans.). London: Free Association Press. 1999.

  31. Hagman, G. (2005). Aesthetic experience: Beauty, creativity and the search for the ideal. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kant, I. (1787). The critique of pure reason (F. M. Miller, Trans.). New York: Anchor. 1966.

  33. Klein, M. (1929). Infantile anxiety-situations reflected in a work of art and in the creative impulse. In Love, guilt and reparation, and other works 1921–1945 (pp. 210–218). London: Virago. 1975.

  34. Kojève, A. (1939). Introduction to the work of Hegel (J. Nichols Jr., Trans.). New York: Basic Books.

  35. Kurosawa, A. (Director); Nagata, M., & Jingo, M. (Producers). (1950). Rashomon [Motion Picture]. Tokyo: Diaei Studios. Japan.

  36. Lacan, J. (1977). Écrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Tavistock.

  37. Lavallée, G. (2003). L’enveloppe visuelle du moi et l’hallucinatoire [The visual envelope of the ego and the hallucination ]. Cahiers de Psychologic Clinique,20, 57–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Levine, H. B. (2013). The colourless canvas: Representation, therapeutic action, and the creation of mind. In H. B. Levine, G. S. Reed, & D. Scarfone (Eds.), Unrepresented states and the construction of meaning: Clinical and theoretical contributions (pp. 42–71). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Likierman, M. (1989). Clinical significance of aesthetic experience. International Review of Psycho-Analysis,16, 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lothane, Z. (2007). Imagination as reciprocal process and its role in the psychoanalytic situation. International Forum of Psychoanalysis,16, 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mayes, L. C., & Cohen, D. J. (1992). The development of a capacity for imagination in early childhood. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child,47, 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Meltzer, D. (1987). On aesthetic reciprocity. Journal of Child Psychotherapy,13, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Meltzer, D., & Harris Williams, M. (1988). The apprehension of beauty: The role of aesthetic conflict in development, art, and violence. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Milner, M. (pseudon., Field, J.) (1950). On not being able to paint. Madison, CT: International Universities Press. 1956.

  45. Milner, M. (1952). The framed gap. In The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis (pp. 79–82). London and New York: Routledge. 1987.

  46. Milner, M. (1957). The ordering of chaos. In The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis (pp. 216–233). London and New York: Routledge.

  47. Milner, M, (1969). The hands of the living god: An account of a psychoanalytic treatment. London: Routledge. 2011.

  48. Milner, M. (1987). The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mitrani, J. L. (1998). Unbearable ecstasy, reverence and awe, and the perpetuation of an “aesthetic conflict.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly,67, 102–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Olsen, O. A. (2004). Depression and reparation as themes in Melanie Klein’s analysis of the painter Ruth Weber. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review,27, 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rodman, F. R. (2002). The psychoanalytic imagination. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis,11(3), 419–440.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Salomonsson, B. (2006). The aesthetic dimension of the psychoanalytic process. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review,29(1), 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sartre, J.P. (1940). The imaginary: A phenomenological psychology of the imagination (J. Webber, Trans.). London: Routledge. 2004.

  54. Schaverien, J. (2007). Countertransference as active imagination: Imaginative experiences of the analyst. Journal of Analytic Psychology,52, 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Torsti, M. (2000). At the sources of the symbolization process. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child,55, 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Townsend, P. (2014). A life of its own: The relationship between artist, idea and artwork. Free Associations,15, 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ver Eecke, W. (2006). Denial, negation, and the forces of the negative. Freud, Hegel, Lacan, Spitz, and Sophocles. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Williams, A. (2000). Reflections on “aesthetic reciprocity.” In M. Cohen & A. Hahn (Eds.), Exploring the work of Donald Meltzer: A Festschrift (pp. 136–152). London: Karnac.

  60. Winnicott, D. W. (1965). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 179–192). London: Karnac.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moshe Halevi Spero.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Moshe Halevi Spero, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology, Louis and Gabi Weisfeld  School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan; Director, Postgraduate Program of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, Bar-Ilan University, Israel; Editor-in-Chief, Ma’arag: The Israel Annual of Psychoanalysis; clinical and supervisory practice, Efrata-Gush Etzyon, Israel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spero, M.H. ON BEING ABLE TO PAINT: THE REVIVAL OF AESTHETIC IMAGINATION THROUGH THE ‘DYADIC PSYCHOANALYTIC ARTIST’. Am J Psychoanal 80, 151–175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-020-09249-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • aesthetic conflict
  • art
  • countertransference
  • dyadic psychoanalytic artist
  • faith
  • genera
  • Hebrew language
  • imagination
  • magical thought
  • micro-analysis
  • repetition