The morality of evolution and a return to subjectivity

Abstract

Today societies display, almost uniformly, an aggressive demeanor that can hardly be covered by diplomacy; they are always prepared for war. The prophecy is repeatedly fulfilled and today we are engaged in protracted wars while fearing universal destruction. This basic attitude irremediably corrupts our consciousness and blemishes our self. The biological underpinnings of how we got to this point, psychologically, and the historical sublimations involved are explored here. The result, today, is that we live using a minimum of our human capacity at the huge cost in crucial energetic waste, while nature has started to protest. The self-feeding destructive mechanism is inordinate objectification, at the expense of our unique subjective power. Evolutionarily designed for balanced self-regulation—the sublimation of a dual instinctual disposition backed up by a dimorphic body and brain—nature warns us we have detoured from the moral blueprint and, were we to continue it will be at our own risk. We need to review our moral theories and return to our critical pre-patriarchal subjectivity, which was resourceful, dually-fed, balanced, and discriminating. That subjectivity is now largely replaced by pre-emptive, ideological cognitive modules and stereotypes that block intelligent dialogue and appear to be already modeled on a false Utopia of artificial intelligences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Andrei, M. (2018). Feral children: Mind blowing cases of children raised by animals. Retrieved from https://www.zmescience.com/other/feature-post/feral-children/

  2. Aristotle (350 B.C.E). The Nicomachean ethics of Aristotle (W. D. Ross, Trans. Books III (chapters 1–5), and Book VII (chapters 1–10)). Seattle, WA: Pacific Publishing Studio. 2011.

  3. Bachofen, J.J. (1861). Mother right. In Myth, religion, and mother right: Selected writings of J.J. Bachofen (R. Manheim, Trans., pp. 69–210). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 1967.

  4. Briffault, R. (1927). The mothers: a study of the origins of the sentiments and institutions (Vols. 1–3). London: The Macmillan Company.

  5. Cai, H. (1994). Society without fathers or husbands: The Na of China (A. Hustvedt, Trans.). New York: Zone Books. 2001.

  6. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Beauvoir, S. (1949). The second sex. New York: Random House. 2011.

  8. Engels, F. (1884). Origins of the family, private property, and the state. The iroquois gens. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), (1969–1970). Selected works. Vol. III. (A. West, Trans., pp. 255-267). Moscow: Progress Press. 1970.

  9. Feuerbach, L. A. (1841). The essence of Christianity. (G. Eliot, Trans.). London: Trübner. 1854.

  10. Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard edition (Vol. 18, pp. 1–64). London: Hogarth.

  11. Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Phenomenology of mind. The phenomenology of spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1977.

  12. Horney, K. (1939). New ways in psychoanalysis. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horney, K. (1950a). A morality of evolution. In Neurosis and human growth. The struggle toward self-realization (pp. 13–16). New York: W.W. Norton.

  14. Horney, K. (1950b). Neurosis and human growth. The struggle toward self-realization. New York. W. W: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jaspers, K. (1949). Characterization of the Axial Period. In The origin and goal of history (pp. 2–5). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Third Printing, 1965.

  16. Knight, C. (1991). Blood relations. Menstruation and the origins of culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kraemer, S. (1991). The origins of fatherhood: An ancient family process. Family Process,30, 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lafitau, J-F. (1724). Customs of the American Indians compared with the customs of primitive times: In two volumes (W. Fenton and E. Moore, Trans.). Toronto: The Champlain Society. 1977.

  19. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. 6. In The German ideology. London: Lawrence and Wishart. 1938.

  21. Mead, G. H. (1934). The I and the me. Part 3, number 5. In C. W. Morris (Ed.), Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

  22. Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient society or researches in the lines of human progress from savagery through barbarism to civilization. Calcutta: Bharti Library. 1944.

  23. Pianka, E. R. (1970). On r- and K-selection. American Naturalist,104, 592–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rendon, M. (2008). Psychoanalysis, a bridge between attachment research and neurobiology. American Journal of Psychoanalysis,68, 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rendon, M. (2018). Why war? Making sense of consciousness and self. New York: International Psychoanalytic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sartre, J. P. (1953). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. (H. E. Barnes, Trans.) New York: Washington Square Press. 1992.

  27. Schore, A. N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origins of the self. The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development in a changing planet. Science,347, 736–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stekel, W. (1908). Neurotic anxiety-states and their treatment. New York: Liveright. 1950.

  30. Thornton, A. (2005). Edward Westermarck, the developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family myths. [Working Paper]. Population Studies Center, the University of Michigan. Retrieved from: https://developmentalidealism.org/pubs/docs/thornton_EdwardWestermarckWorkingPaper.pdf

  31. Weiss, F. A. (1952). Psychoanalysis and moral values. American Journal of Psychoanalysis,12, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Westermarck, E. A. (1891). The history of human marriage. 3 Volumes. (5th. Ed., rewritten). London: MacMillan. 1921.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Rendón.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mario Rendon, M.D. author and psychoanalyst; Past Dean of the American Institute for Psychoanalysis; Past Editor of the American Journal of Psychoanalysis.

Address Correspondence to: Mario Rendon, M.D.; 975A Heritage Village; Southbury, CT 06488, USA. E-mail:mariorendon7@gmail.com

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rendón, M. The morality of evolution and a return to subjectivity. Am J Psychoanal 80, 1–15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-020-09231-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • instinctual disposition
  • morality
  • evolution
  • patriarchy
  • matriarchy
  • climate change
  • culture
  • history
  • psychoanalytic theory