Psychoanalysis is a narrative activity of a very special kind. One could even say that the method of free association is a subversive activity since its purpose is to cut through layers of previous conditioning in the effort to open new spaces in the psyche. The hypercathexis of neurotic functioning can only be transformed if new, unknown dynamics are able to emerge, and can then be invested by the subject. This process necessitates economic change—investing novel psychic functioning. Aided by personal analytic experience, the psychoanalyst’s role is to help initiate and support this subversive activity in the patient by initiating him/her into the method of free association. Difficulties arise when neither the patient, nor the analyst are comfortable with the symbolic and metaphorical dynamics of free association. Reacting to Freud’s lack of interest in an emotional analytic process with the patient, Ferenczi considered the analytical space as a mutual frame, to be transformed in and by the intimate psychoanalytical process. The author explores Ferenczi’s Clinical Diary as the construction of an intimate space through narration, attempting to discover Ferenczi’s techniques in this subversive activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anzieu, D. (1959). L’Auto-analyse de Freud et la découverte de la psychanalyse [Freud’s self-analysis and the discovery of psychoanalysis]. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France. Paris, 1975.
Barrie, J. M. (1906). Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Bigras, J. (1977). L’Enfant dans le grenier [The child in the attic]. Paris: Librairie Hachette.
Borbely, A. F. (1998). The psychoanalytical concept of metaphor. International Journal of Psychoanalysis,79, 923–936.
Boschan, P. (2011). Transference and countertransference in Sándor Ferenczi’s Clinical Diary. American Journal of Psychoanalysis,71, 309–320.
Dupont, J. (1994). Freud’s analysis of Ferenczi as revealed by their correspondence. International Journal of Psychoanalysis,75, 301–320.
Ferenczi, S. (1932). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi (J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Freud, S. & Ferenczi, S. (1908–1914). The correspondence for Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 1. 1908–1914. E. Brabant, E. Falzeder & P. Giampieri-Deutsch (Eds.) (P. T. Hoffer, Trans.), With an Introduction by A. Haynal. Cambridge, MA/London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1992.
Freud, S., & Ferenczi, S. (1914–1919). The correspondence for Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 2. 1914–1919. E. Falzeder & E. Brabant, (Eds.) (P. T. Hoffer, Trans.), With an Introduction by A. Hoffer. Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1996. In French: Correspondence 1914–1919. Paris: Calmann-Levy, 1996.
Freud, S., & Ferenczi, S. (1920–1933). The correspondence for Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 3, 1920–1933. In E. Falzeder & E. Brabant (Eds.), With the collaboration of P. Giampieri-Deutsch under the supervision of A. Haynal (P. T. Hoffer, Trans.) With and Introduction by J. Dupont. Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2000.
Freud, S., & Fliess, W. (1887–1904). The complete letters of Sigmund Freud and Wilhelm Fliess (J. M. Masson, Ed. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Kelley-Lainé, K. (1996). Ferenczi’s mother tongue. In P. L. Rudnytsky, A. Bókay, & P. Giampieri-Deutch (Eds.), Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis (pp. 160–169). New York: New York University Press.
Kelley-Lainé, K. (1997). Peter Pan: The story of lost childhood (2nd ed.). London: Element Books. Peter Pan ou l’enfant triste. Paris: Calmann-Levy. Hungarian edition: Peter Pan, avagy a szomorú gyermek. Budapest: Oriold és Társai. 2011.
Ogden, T. (1997). Reverie and metaphor: Some thoughts on how I work as an analyst. International Journal of Psychoanalysis,78, 719–732.
Strachey, J. (1974). Indexes and biographies (Standard ed., Vol. 24). London: Hogarth.
Winnicott, D. W. (1960). Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. In Maturational processes and facilitating environment (pp. 140–152). New York: International Universities Press, 1965.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Kathleen Kelley-Lainé, member, Société Psychanalytique de Paris, France.
Address correspondence to Kathleen Kelley-Lainé, SPP France, 109 Rue de Vaugirard, 75006 Paris, France.
About this article
Cite this article
Kelley-Lainé, K. Constructing Intimate Space Through Narration: Ferenczi’s Clinical Diary*. Am J Psychoanal 79, 484–493 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-019-09221-2
- analytical space