Ferenczi’s striving for mutuality, a call which Freud didn’t take up, let him explore this concept with his analysands. He thus became the originator of mutual analysis, although with caveats, and of the concept of introjection, another important Ferenczian notion. The analyst’s attitude of knowing the ‘objective’ and independent Truth is changing its orientation into that of a co-construction in the analytic work; here the analyst and the analysand build a third internal world, which they share and which remains their own. Clinical vignettes illustrate the implications of these views.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Aristotle. (384–322, B.C.E.). Politics. Translated and with an introduction by C. Lord. Chicago: University Press, 1984.

  2. Aron, L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borgogno, F. (2011). Sándor Ferenczi, the “Introjective Psychoanalyst”. American Imago, 68, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferenczi, S. (1909). Introjection and transference. In First contributions to psycho-analysis (pp. 35–93). New York: Brunner/Mazel. 1980.

  5. Ferenczi, S. (1932). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi (J. Dupont, Ed., M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1988.

  6. Ferenczi, S. and Groddeck, G. (1921–1933). The Sándor Ferenczi-Georg Groddeck correspondence 19211933. C. Fortune (Ed.). London: Open Gate Press. 2002.

  7. Freud, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment. Standard edition, 12 (pp. 123–144). London: Hogarth.

  8. Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard edition, 18 (pp. 7–64). London: Hogarth.

  9. Freud, S. & Ferenczi, S. (1908–1914). The correspondence for Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 1. 19081914 (E. Brabant, E. Falzeder & P. Giampieri-Deutsch, Eds., P. T. Hoffer, Trans.), With an Introduction by A. Haynal. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1992.

  10. Haynal, A. (1999). The countertransference in the work of Ferenczi. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haynal, A., & Haynal, V. (2015). Ferenczi’s attitude. In A. Harris & S. Kuchuck (Eds.), The legacy of Sàndor Ferenczi: From ghost to ancestor (pp. 52–74). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hristeva, G. (2013). Uterus Loquitur”: Trauma and the human organism in Ferenczi’s “Physiology of Pleasure. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 339–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mutualité. In Dictionnaire de français Larousse. Retrieved from

  14. Mutuality. In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from

  15. Ricard, M. (2015). Altruism. New York: Little Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. (2014). Empathy and compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), R875–R878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, N. A. (1999). From Oedipus to Orpha: Revisiting Ferenczi and Severn Landmark case. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 345–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soreanu, R. (2017). Something was lost in Freud’s Beyond the Pleasure Principle: A Ferenczian reading. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 223–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to André E. Haynal.

Additional information

André E. Haynal, M.D., philosopher, physician, psychoanalyst (IPA, Swiss Society), author, Professor at the University of Geneva (Switzerland).

Address correspondence to André E. Haynal, 20 B. chemin de la Gradelle, 1224 Geneva, Switzerland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haynal, A.E. Mutuality*. Am J Psychoanal 78, 342–349 (2018).

Download citation


  • Sándor Ferenczi
  • mutuality
  • authenticity
  • introjection
  • transference and counter-transference