Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Presence in the Psychoanalytic Encounter and the Role of Apology*

  • Article
  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper discusses aspects of ethical presence in psychoanalysis, and the possible use of apology in the therapeutic process. The author roughly delineates two periods in the history of psychoanalysis regarding the ethical dimension—the early classical period which is influenced by Freud’s ethics of honesty, which gradually evolves towards the more recent intersubjectively-influenced period, necessitating the assimilation of an ethics of relationships. It is suggested that explicit theorizing of the ethical dimension into psychoanalysis offers added value to its effectiveness, and a framework is presented for combining relational, intersubjectively informed ethical dialogue, with contributions of classical technique, enriching the therapeutic potential of psychoanalytic work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhtar, S. (2018). Humility. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78(1).

  • Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, L. & Harris, A. (Eds.). (1993). The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1995). Like subjects, love objects: Essays on recognition and sexual differences. New Haven, CT: Yale Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (2009). A relational psychoanalysis perspective on the necessity of acknowledging failure in order to restore the facilitating and containing features of the intersubjective relationship (the shared third). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 90, 441–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E. (1999). Sándor Ferenczi today: Reviving the broken dialectic. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 303–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1999). Martin Buber on psychology and psychotherapy: Essays, letters, and dialogue. In J. B. Agassi (Ed.) New York: Syracuse University Press.

  • Celenza, A. & Gabbard, G. O. (2003). Analysts who commit sexual boundary violations: A lost cause? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51, 617–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chessick, R. D. (1994). On corruption. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 22, 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetrit-Vatine, V. (2014). The ethical seduction of the analytic situation: The feminine/maternal origins of responsibility for the other. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. (2004). Whose bad objects are we anyway? Repetition and our elusive love affair with evil. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 711–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, J. (1988). Introduction. In J. Dupont (Ed.) Ferenczi, S. (1932). The Clinical Diary of Sándor Ferenczi (M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.) (pp. xi–xxvii). Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.

  • Erikson, E. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. In Psychological Issues, Vol 1/1. New York: International Universities Press.

  • Erikson, E. (1964). Lectures on the ethical implications of psychoanalytic insights. In Insight and Responsibility: Lectures on the ethical implications of psychoanalytic insights. New York: Norton.

  • Fairbairn, W. R. B. (1946). Object-relationships and dynamic structure. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, 30–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1928). Elasticity of psychoanalytic technique. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (pp. 87–101). London: Karnac. 1994.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1932). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. (J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.) Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press. 1988.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of the tongues between the adults and the child (The Language of Tenderness and of Passion). First English publication in 1949. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, 225230. Also in Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (pp. 156–167). London: Karnac. 1994.

  • Fonagy, P. & Allison, L. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51, 372–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psycho-analysis. Standard edition, 12 (pp. 109–120). London: Hogarth.

  • Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working through. Standard edition, 12 (pp. 145–156). London: Hogarth.

  • Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference love (Further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis III). Standard edition, 12 (pp. 157–171). London: Hogarth.

  • Freud, S. (1937) Analysis terminable and interminable. Standard edition, 23 (pp. 211–253). London: Hogarth.

  • Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself. An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard, G. O. and Lester, E. P. (1995). Nonsexual boundary violations. Chapter 7: In Boundaries and boundary violations in psychoanalysis (pp. 122–147). New York: Basic Books.

  • Gert, B. and Gert, J. (2017). The definition of morality. In E. N. Zalda (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall, 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/morality-definition/.

  • Ghent, E. (1989). Credo—The dialectics of one-person and two-person psychologies. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 25, 169–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1993.

  • Goldberg, A. (1987). The place of apology in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. The International Review of Psychoanalysis, 14, 409–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1960). Psychoanalysis and moral values. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, I. (2008). Coasting in the countertransference: Conflicts of self interest between analyst and patient. New York: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, I. Z. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process: A dialectical constructivist view. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, I. Z. (2009). Therapeutic passion in the countertransference. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 617–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, T. J. (2001). On misreading and misleading patients: Some reflections on communications, miscommunications and countertransference enactments. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82, 653–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kekes, J. (2000). Pluralism in philosophy: Changing the subject. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 27, 99–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure?. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, R. (2002). The intersubjective approach to psychotherapeutic action. Sihot, 16, 158–165. (in Hebrew Journal).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, W. W. (2003). The ethical dimension of psychoanalysis. A dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, W. W. (2007). What if there is an ethical dimension in psychoanalysis? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 541–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillside, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. & Aron, L. (Eds.). (1999). Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition. Hillside, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. & Black, M. J. (2002). Can love last: The fate of romance over time. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucci, C. (2014). Trauma, healing and the reconstruction of truth. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 31–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary. (1995). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Rieff, P. (1960). Freud: The mind of the moralist. London: University paperbacks, Metheun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1977). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1980). Freud, morality, and hermeneutics. New Literary History, 12, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slochower, J. (2003). The analyst’s secret delinquencies. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M. (1999). Modes of therapeutic action: Enhancement of knowledge, provision of experience, and engagement in relationship. Northvale, NJ: Jason & Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. B. (2012). Implicit theories of technique and the values that inspire them. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., et al. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 79, 903–921.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storolow, R. & Atwood, G. (1993). Faces in a cloud: Intersubjectivity in personality theory. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storolow, R. D., Brandchaft, B. & Atwood, G. E. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillside, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallwork, E. (1991). Psychoanalysis and ethics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena—A study of the first not-me possession. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based upon a Ph.D. thesis that was written in the Interdisciplinary Studies Unit in Bar-Ilan University under the supervision of Prof. Avi Sagi, and Dr. Aner Govrin.

Address correspondence to Micha Weiss, Ph.D., Ahdut Haavoda st. 12, Givatayim 5320202, Israel; e-mail: michaweiss13@gmail.com

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weiss, M. Ethical Presence in the Psychoanalytic Encounter and the Role of Apology*. Am J Psychoanal 78, 28–46 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-017-9128-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-017-9128-z

Keywords

Navigation