Something Was Lost in Freud’s Beyond the Pleasure Principle: A Ferenczian Reading*

Abstract

Freud’s Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920) brought a lot of new possibilities to psychoanalytic theory, but also a series of losses. While I recognize the importance of the death drive as a metapsychological construct, I argue that the first thing that went missing with the arrival of this groundbreaking Freudian text is the theorization of the ego instincts or the self-preservative drives. Freud never articulated some plausible inheritors of the ego instincts. I follow the Budapest School, and especially the voice of Sándor Ferenczi, for addressing this loss. The second thing that went missing after Beyond the Pleasure Principle is our openness in thinking through repetition. With the seductive formulation of the “daemonic” repetition in this 1920 text, our theoretical imagination around repetition seems to have been affected. I draw on the work of Sándor Ferenczi for exploring new forms of repetition. Finally, I offer a Ferenczian re-reading of the Freudian Nachträglichkeit, which I see as crucial in the process of pluralizing our thinking on repetition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Avello, J. J. (1998). Metapsychology in Ferenczi: Death instinct or death passion? International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 7, 229–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balint, M. (1937). Early developmental states of the ego: Primary object love. In Primary love and psychoanalytic technique (pp. 90–108). London: Karnac, 1994.

  3. Birksted-Breen, D. (2003). Time and the après-coup. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84, 1501–1515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Borossa, J. (2014). Ferenczi’s ethics of our time: The possibility of being alongside. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 349–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dahl, G. (2010). The two time vectors of Nachträglichkeit in the development of ego organization: Significance of the concept for the symbolization of nameless traumas and anxieties. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 91, 727–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Masi, F. (2015). Is the concept of the death drive still useful in the clinical field? The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96, 445–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erős, F. (2014). Freedom and authority in the Clinical Diary. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 367–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Faimberg, H. (2007). A plea for a broader concept of Nachträglichkeit. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 76, 1221–1240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferenczi, S. (1909). Introjection and transference. In First contributions to psycho-analysis (pp. 35–93). London: Karnac, 1994.

  10. Ferenczi, S. (1913). Stages in the development of the sense of reality. In First contributions to psycho-analysis (pp. 213–239). London: Karnac, 1994.

  11. Ferenczi, S. (1921). The symbolism of the bridge. In Further contributions to the theory and technique of psycho-analysis (pp. 352–356). London: Karnac, 1994.

  12. Ferenczi, S. (1924). Thalassa: A theory of genitality (H. A. Bunker, Trans.). Albany, NY: The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 1938.

  13. Ferenczi, S. (1929). The unwelcome child and his death instinct. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (pp. 102–107). London: Karnac, 1994.

  14. Ferenczi, S. (1931). Child analysis in the analysis of adults. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (pp. 126–142). London: Karnac, 1994.

  15. Ferenczi, S. (1932). The Clinical Diary of Sándor Ferenczi (M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.

  16. Fletcher, J. (2013). Freud and the scene of trauma. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Frank, C. (2015). On the reception of the concept of the death drive in Germany: Expressing and resisting an ‘evil principle’? The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96, 425–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Standard edition (Vol. 7, pp. 125–243). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Freud, S. (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. Standard edition (Vol. 12, pp. 213–226). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism: An introduction. Standard edition (Vol. 14, pp. 67–102). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard edition (Vol. 18, pp. 3–64). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Green, A. (1996). On private madness. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gurevich, H. (2016). Orpha, orphic functions, and the orphic analyst: Winnicott’s “regression to dependence” in the language of Ferenczi. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 322–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hristeva, G. (2013). “Uterus Loquitur”: Trauma and the human organism in Ferenczi’s “physiology of pleasure”. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 339–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kerz-Rühling, I. (1993). Nachträglichkeit. Psyche-Z Psychoanal, 47, 911–933.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Koritar, E., & Garon, J. (Issue Editors). (2017). Second Toronto special issue: The heritage of a psychoanalytic mind. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77(3).

  27. Laplanche, J. (1987). Nouveaux fondements pour la psychanalyse. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laplanche, J. (1998). Notes sur l’après-coup. Conference on psychoanalytical intracultural and intercultural dialogue, International Psychoanalytical Association, Paris, July 27–29, 1998.

  29. Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J.-B. (1968). Fantasy and the origins of sexuality. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 49, 1–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lothane, Z. (1998). The feud between Freud and Ferenczi over love. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 58, 21–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oliner, M. (2013). “Non-represented” mental states. In H. B. Levine, G. S. Reed, & D. Scarfone (Eds.), Unrepresented states and the construction of meaning: Clinical and theoretical contributions (pp. 152–171). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rand, N., & Torok, M. (1997). Questions for Freud: The secret history of psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roussillon, R. (2011). Primitive agony and symbolization. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Saussure, F. (1916). A course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.

  35. Stanton, M. (1990). Sándor Ferenczi: Reconsidering active intervention. London: Free Association.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Summers, F. (2008). Theoretical insularity and the crisis of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25, 413–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomä, H., & Cheshire, N. (1991). Freud’s Nachträglichkeit and Strachey’s ‘deferred action’: Trauma, constructions and the direction of causality. The International Review of Psychoanalysis, 18, 407–427.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Young-Bruehl, E. (2011). The trauma of lost love in psychoanalysis. In S. Akhtar & M. K. O’Neil (Eds.), On Freud’s ‘beyond the pleasure principle’ (pp. 250–264). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Stephen Frosh, Ana Maria Furtado, Claudia Garcia, Endre Koritar and Carlos Lannes. The writing of this article was supported through a Wellcome Trust Fellowship in Medical Humanities.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raluca Soreanu.

Additional information

Address correspondence to Raluca Soreanu, Ph.D., Department of Psychosocial Studies, School of Social Science, History and Philosophy, Birkbeck, University of London, 26 Russell Square, Room 230, Bloomsbury, London, WC1B 5DQ, UK.

*This paper is part of the Second Toronto Special Issue, The Heritage of a Psychoanalytic Mind (Koritar & Garon, 2017).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soreanu, R. Something Was Lost in Freud’s Beyond the Pleasure Principle: A Ferenczian Reading*. Am J Psychoanal 77, 223–238 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-017-9105-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • repetition
  • reliving
  • the death drive
  • ego instincts
  • self-preservative drives
  • Nachträglichkeit