Abstract
The aim of this article is to think of the place of the witness as a third place that the analyst, in the clinical space of trauma, is able to sustain. According to Ferenczi, in traumatic dreams a third is already being summoned. It is not the witness of the realm of law, nor the place of the father or the symbolic law. This is a third space that can be called potential, interstitial space, indeterminate and formless, where something that at first would be incommunicable circulates and gradually takes shape. This space allows and supports the literalness of a testimonial narrative, its hesitations, paradoxes and silences. More than a trauma theory, the notion of a potential space would be the great contribution of psychoanalysis to the treatment of trauma survivors, establishing the difference between the task of a psychoanalyst and the one of a truth commission.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Agamben, G. (1999). Remnants of Auschwitz: The witness and the archive. (Homo Sacer III). New York: Zone Books.
Benveniste, E. (1969). Le vocabulaire des intitutions indo-européenes. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life. The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
Delbo, C. (1995). Auschwitz and after. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Felman, S., & Laub, D. (1991). Testimony: Crisis of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis and history. New York: Routledge.
Ferenczi, S. (1909). Introjection and transference. In First contributions to psychoanalysis (pp. 33–93). London: Karnac, 1994.
Ferenczi, S. (1928). The elasticity of psychoanalytical technique. In M. Balint (Ed.), Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (pp. 87–101). London: Hogarth Press.
Ferenczi, S. (1931a). On the revision of the interpretation of dreams. In M. Balint (Ed.), Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (pp. 238–242). London: Hogarth Press.
Ferenczi, S. (1931b). Child analysis in the analysis of adults. In M. Balint (Ed.), Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (pp. 126–142). London: Hogarth Press.
Ferenczi, S. (1932). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. In J. Dupont (Ed.) (M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gondar, J. (2011). Things in words. Ferenczi and language. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 329–337.
Gondar, J. (Issue Editor) (2017). Special issue. Trauma and subjectivity: A South American perspective. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77(1).
Kelley-Lainé, K. (2014). Trauma child on the couch: Transference, introjection, identification. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 60–70.
Klee, P., & Gale, M. (2013). Creative confession and other writings. London: Tate Publishing.
Levi, P. (1988). The drowned and the saved. New York: Summit.
Levi, P. (1993). If this is a man. New York: First Collier Editions.
Prince, R. (2009). The self in pain: The paradox of memory. The paradox of testimony. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 69, 279–290.
Schneider, M. (1988). The trauma and the paradoxical filiation. Paris: Éditions Ramsay.
Schneider, M. (1992). The part of the shadow. Approach to female trauma. Paris: Aubier
Seligmann-Silva, M. (2008). Narrating the trauma. In Psicologia clínica, 20(1), 65–82.
Seligmann-Silva, M. (2010). The place of testimony. In Tempo e argumento, 2(1), 3–20.
Semprun, J. (1980). What a beautiful Sunday. New York: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Semprun, J. (2005). The long voyage. New York: Overlook Press.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971/1991). Playing and reality. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Address correspondence to Jô Gondar, PhD. Rua General Cristóvão Barcelos 24/701, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22245-110, Brazil.
*This paper is part of the Special Issue, Trauma and Subjectivity: A South American Perspective (Gondar, 2017).
Translated by Christianne Otero.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gondar, J. BETWEEN PSYCHOANALYSIS AND TESTIMONIAL SPACE: THE ANALYST AS A WITNESS*. Am J Psychoanal 77, 52–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-016-9077-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-016-9077-y