Risk Management

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 240–275 | Cite as

The uncertainty of systemic risk

Original Article

Abstract

This article responds to calls in the literature for a major shift in approaches to explaining systemic risk. It applies insights from multiple disciplines, but departs from the monistic positivist research orientations of many previous contributions by taking a carefully argued pragmatic approach from management science to address non-linear intractability. A new operational behaviour paradigm of systemic failure is summarized, in which notions from evolutionary economics and complexity science are combined with an interpretation of entropy as risk uncertainty, to explain systemic risk in terms of catastrophic bifurcations simulated in the operational state-space of an agent-based computational model representing a highly simplified global financial system. Then the key features of a recent programme of theory development research based on this approach are described, in which the results of a simulation of Iceland’s financial system collapse were validated with empirical data from annual reports over that period. Findings suggested that a lack of diversity in participation strategies among system participants may have been a key operational mechanism of catastrophic tensions over supply versus demand for financial services, confirming academic commentary on that event. In conclusion, the operational definition of systemic risk proposed in this research is argued to be a practical basis on which future research may be able to construct computational solutions capable of measuring systemic risk more accurately by predicting systemic failure of the global financial system in more detailed and realistic simulations for diverse applications such as financial system regulation and cyber-warfare impact analysis.

Keywords

systemic risk uncertainty catastrophe entropy simulation theory 

References

  1. Acharya, V.V. (2009) A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation. Journal of Financial Stability 5 (3): 224–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alchian, A.A. (1950) Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. The Journal of Political Economy 58 (3): 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, F. and Carletti, E. (2013) What is systemic risk? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45 (1): 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, P.M., Varga, L. and Strathern, M. (2010) The evolutionary complexity of social and economic systems: The inevitability of uncertainty and surprise. Risk Management 12 (1): 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bak, P. and Sneppen, K. (1993) Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. Physical Review Letters 71 (24): 4083–4086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bak, P., Tang, C. and Wiesenfeld, K. (1987) Self-organized criticality: An explanation of the 1/f noise. Physical Review Letters 59 (4): 381–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartram, S.M., Brown, G.W. and Hund, J.E. (2007) Estimating systemic risk in the international financial system. Journal of Financial Economics 86 (3): 835–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beal, N., Rand, D.G., Battey, H., Croxson, K., May, R.M. and Nowak, M.A. (2011) Individual versus systemic risk and the regulator's dilemma. PNAS 108 (31): 12647–12652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beinhocker, E.D. (2011) Evolution as computation: Implications for economic theory and ontology. Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (Special Issue 3): 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benediktsdottir, S., Danielsson, J. and Zoega, G. (2011) Lessons from a collapse of a financial system. Economic Policy 26 (66): 183–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhattacharyay, B.N. (2003) Towards a macro-prudential leading indicators framework for monitoring financial vulnerability. CISifo Working Paper No. 1015 (August).Google Scholar
  12. Boltzmann, L. (1878) Über die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze der mechanischen Wärmetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, respective den Sätzen über das Wärmegleichgewicht. Sitzungsberichte Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Classe der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 76 (2): 373–435.Google Scholar
  13. Borio, C.E.V. and Drehmann, M. (2009) Towards an Operational Framework for Financial Stability: ‘Fuzzy’ Measurement and its Consequences (Working Papers No 284). Basel: BIS Monetary and Economic Department.Google Scholar
  14. Boulding, K.E. (1981) Evolutionary Economics. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Bradley, S. (2013) Cyberrisk in banking. Report sponsored by SAS. New York: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Bridgman, P. (1927) The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Buchanan, M. (2009) Economics: Meltdown modelling. Nature 460 (7256): 680–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colander, D. et al (2009) The financial crisis and the systemic failure of the economics profession. Critical Review 21 (2–3): 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornelissen, J.P. (2006) Making sense of theory construction: Metaphor and disciplined imagination. Organization Studies 27 (11): 1579–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Crnkovic, G.D. (2010) Constructive research and info-computational knowledge generation. Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology 314: 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis, J.P., Eisenhardt, K.M. and Bingham, C.B. (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review 32 (2): 480–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Denzin, N.K. (1970) The Research Act in Sociology. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  24. Di Maggio, P.J. (1995) Comments on ‘what theory is not’. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (3): 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dore, M.H.I. and Rosser, Jr. J.B. (2007) Do nonlinear dynamics in economics amount to a kuhnian paradigm shift? Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Science 11 (1): 119–147.Google Scholar
  26. Dubin, R. (1978) Theory Building. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Epstein, J.M. (1999) Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity 4 (5): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Farmer, J.D. and Geanakoplos, J. (2009) The virtues and vices of equilibrium and the future of financial economics. Complexity 14 (3): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Farmer, J.D. et al (2012) A complex systems approach to constructing better models for managing financial markets and the economy. The European Physical Journal 214 (1): 295–324.Google Scholar
  30. Foster, J. (2011) Evolutionary macroeconomics: A research agenda. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 21: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gatti, D.D., Gaffeo, E. and Gallegati, M. (2010) Complex agent-based macroeconomics: A manifesto for a new paradigm. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 5 (2): 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971) The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gioia, D.A. and Pitre, E. (1990) Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review 15 (4): 584–602.Google Scholar
  34. Gould, S.J. (1982) Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory. Science 216 (4544): 380–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Govtvan, O. and Mansurov, A. (2011) Systemic risk in the financial sphere: Theoretical study and approaches to its estimation. Studies on Russian Economic Development 22 (2): 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2005) Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions and Emerging Confluences. 3rd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Helbing, D. (2010) Systemic risks in society and economics. IRGC Report – The Emergence of Risks: Contributing Factors (pp. 1–25). Geneva: International Risk Governance Council.Google Scholar
  38. Helbing, D. (2012) Social Self-Organization: Agent-Based Simulations and Experiments to Study Emergent Social Behavior. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ho, T. and Saunders, A. (1980) A catastrophe model of bank failure. The Journal of Finance XXXV (5): 1189–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holt, R.P.F., Rosser, J.B.J. and Colander, D. (2011) The complexity era in economics. Review of Political Economy 23 (3): 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holton, G.A. (2004) Defining risk. Financial Analysts Journal 60 (6): 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoogduin, L. (2010) Macroprudential instruments and frameworks: A stocktaking of issues and experiences. In Paper No 38. CGFS Papers, Geneva: BIS.Google Scholar
  43. Huang, X., Zhou, H. and Zhu, H. (2009) A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance 33 (11): 2036–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ilin, T. (2014) An evolutionary theory of systemic risk and its mitigation for the global financial system. PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield.Google Scholar
  45. Jorda, O., Schularick, M. and Taylor, A.M. (2011) Financial crises, credit booms, and external imbalances: 140 years of lessons. IMF Economic Review 59 (2): 349–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B.J. (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1 (1): 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaufman, G.G. and Scott, K.E. (2003) What is systemic risk, and do bank regulators retard or contribute to it? Independent Review 7 (3): 371–391.Google Scholar
  48. Keen, S. (1995) Finance and economic breakdown: Modeling Minsky’s ‘financial instability hypothesis’. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 17 (4): 607–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Keynes, J.M. (1921) A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
  50. Knight, F.H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston, MA: Hart, Shaffner & Marx.Google Scholar
  51. Kolmogorov, A.N. (1933) Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leijonhufvud, A. (2006) Agent-based macro. In: K. Schmedders and Kenneth L. Judd (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics. 2nd edn. pp. 1625–1637.Google Scholar
  53. Minsky, H.P. (1992) The financial instability hypothesis. Levy Economics Institute 35 (8): 112–123.Google Scholar
  54. Nelson, R.R. (2013) Demand, supply, and their interaction on markets, as seen from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 23 (1): 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. London: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  56. Nielsson, U. and Torfason, B.K. (2012) Iceland’s economic eruption and meltdown. Scandinavian Economic History Review 60 (1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. OICU-IOSCO (2013) Cyber-Crime, Securities Markets and Systemic Risk. Working paper, Madrid, OICU-IOSCO and World Federation of Exchanges, 1–58.Google Scholar
  58. Planck, M. (1901) Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum. Ann. Physik 309 (3): 553–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Renyi, A. (1961) On Measures of Entropy and Information. Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1. California: University of California Press, pp. 547–561.Google Scholar
  60. Rochet, J.-C. (2003) Why are there so many banking crises? Economic Studies 49 (2): 141–155.Google Scholar
  61. Rosser, J.B.J. (1999) On the complexities of complex economic dynamics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (4): 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosser, J.B.J. (2000) From Catastrophe to Chaos: A General Theory of Economic Discontinuities (Second Edition). (Vols. Volume I Mathematics, Microeconomics, Macroeconomics, and Finance), London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosser, J.B.J. (2007) The rise and fall of catastrophe theory applications in economics: Was the baby thrown out with the bathwater? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31 (10): 3255–3280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Safarzynska, K. and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2010) Evolutionary models in economics: A survey of methods and building blocks. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20 (3): 329–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schwarcz, S.L. (2008) Systemic risk. The Georgetown Law Journal 97 (1): 193–249.Google Scholar
  66. Shannon, C.E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27 (379–423): 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Strogatz, S.H. (1994) Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sutton, R.I. and Staw, B.M. (1995) What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (3): 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thom, R. (1972) Stabilite Structurelle et Morphogenese: Essai d'une Theori Generale des Modeles. New York: Benjamin, (1. S. English translation, Ed.), English translation, 1975, Structural Stability and Morpogenesis: An Outline of a Theory of Models.Google Scholar
  70. Thom, R. (1975) Catastrophe theory: Its present state and future perspectives. In: A. Manning (ed.), Dynamical Systems – Warwick 1974. Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Vol. 468, pp. 366–389 (with response by Zeeman, E.C.)). Springer, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  71. Thom, R. (1983) Mathematical Models of Morphogenesis. Chichester, UK: Ellis Harwood.Google Scholar
  72. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. and Gowdy, J.M. (2000) Evolutionary theories in environmental and resource economics: Approaches and applications. Environmental and Resource Economics 17 (1): 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Veblen, T.B. (1898) Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Quarterly Journal of Economics 12 (3): 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Velupillai, K.V. (2005) The unreasonable ineffectiveness of mathematics in economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29 (6): 849–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wacker, J.G. (1998) A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management 16 (4): 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. WEF (2014) Global Risks 2014 Ninth Edition. Report – World Economic Forum, Geneva.Google Scholar
  77. Weick, K.E. (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 516–531.Google Scholar
  78. Worren, N.A., Moore, K. and Elliott, R. (2002) When theories become tools: Toward a framework for pragmatic validity. Human Relations 55 (10): 1227–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zeeman, E.C. (1976) Catastrophe theory. Scientific American Magazine 65–70, 75–83.Google Scholar
  80. Zigrand, J.P. (2014) Systems and Systemic Risk in Finance and Economics. SRC Special Paper No 1 (Working Paper), London, UK: London School of Economics and Political Science, System Risk Centre.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management, Complex Systems Research Centre, Cranfield UniversityCranfieldUK
  2. 2.Complex Systems Research Centre, Cranfield UniversityCranfieldUK

Personalised recommendations