The British sociologist Anthony Giddens has introduced the concept of fateful moments. However, it is not easy to recognise fateful moments in the real world, and lack of time and competence coupled with structural and organisational barriers and unawareness of system complexity make the task difficult. Tools for risk and vulnerability analysis can lend powerful decision-making support and help ensure optimal outcomes. Drawing on the concept of fateful moments and common risk analytic approaches, this article discusses the use of risk-based thinking in two different decision-making settings, neither of which is typical of the current use of risk analyses. Both situations, however, may be interpreted as fateful moments as described by Giddens. First, we deal with demarcated and temporary activities under the responsibility of a local government (municipality), for example, arranging school trips, medical treatment in nursing homes or sports events. These are all activities requiring planning that takes possible adverse effects into consideration. Second, we look into crisis management at the scene of an accident. In crises, the time frame can be extremely short and the choices of action may be potentially fatal for victims or rescuers. An analysis of our two cases leads us to claim that some actors are reluctant to employ proven risk assessment tools in such situations because they see theoretical probability concepts as a major obstacle. The implications are that risk-based decision processes may be undermined and critical reflections omitted in decision making. Furthermore, this reluctance opens the field to ‘risk experts’ and personnel become further distanced from safety considerations. One way forward may be to guide decision makers to accept these tools as practical instruments for establishing a risk image as a basis for decisions in fateful moments.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Andersen, S.S. (1997) Case-studier og generalisering: forskningsstrategi og design, [Case Studies and Generalisation: Research Strategy and Design] Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
Apostolakis, G.E. (1990) The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. Science 250 (4986): 1359–1364.
Apostolakis, G.E. (1993) A commentary on model uncertainty. Paper presented at the Workshop on Model Uncertainty: Its Characterization and Quantification.
Aven, T. (2010) Misconceptions of Risk. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Aven, T. (2011) On some recent definitions and analysis frameworks for risk, vulnerability, and resilience. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 31 (4): 515–522.
Aven, T. and Renn, O. (2010) Risk Management and Governance: Concepts, Guidelines and Applications. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Braut, G.S. and Njå, O. (2009) Learning from accidents (incidents). Theoretical perspectives on investigation reports as educational tools. In: R. Briš, C. Guedes Soares and S. Martorell (eds.) Reliability Risk and Safety. Theory and Applications. London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 9–16.
Cannon-Bowers, J.A. and Bell, H.H. (1997) Training decision makers for complex environments: Implications of the naturalistic decision making perspective. In: C.E. Zsambok and G. Klein (eds.) Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, pp. 99–110.
Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. and Pruitt, J.S. (1996) Establishing the boundaries of a paradigm for decision making research. Human Factors 38 (2): 193–205.
DSB. (1994) Veileder for kommunale risiko- og sårbarhetsanalyser, [Guideline for Risk and Vulnerability Analysis for Use in Local Government] Oslo, Norway: Direktoratet for sivilt beredsap [Directorate for civil protection].
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.
Haimes, Y.Y. (2009) On the complex definition of risk: A systems-based approach. Risk Analysis, An International Journal 29 (12): 1647–1654.
Haimes, Y.Y. (2011) Responses to Terje Aven's paper: On some recent definitions and analysis frameworks for risk, vulnerability, and resilience. Risk Analysis 31 (5): 689–692.
Kaplan, S. (1997) The words of risk analysis. Risk Analysis 17 (4): 407–417.
Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B.J. (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1 (1): 11–27.
Klein, G. (1993) A Recognition – Primed Decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: G. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood and C.E. Zsambok (eds.) Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 138–147.
Lipshitz, R. and Strauss, O. (1997) Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 69 (2): 149–163.
Nilsen, A.S. (2007) Municipal Risk Management. Implications of the Use of Different Risk Tools. Stavanger, Norway: University of Stavanger.
Njå, O. and Rake, E.L. (2003) Risk-based decision making on accident scenes. In emergency management in a changing world. Paper presented at the International Emergency Management Society; 10th Annual Conference.
Rake, E.L. (2003) Emergency management and decision making on accident scenes: Taxonomy, models and future research. International Journal of Emergency Management 1 (4): 397–409.
Rake, E.L. (2004) A risk-informed approach to decision making in rescue operations. Paper presented at the International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM7/ESREL04), Berlin.
Rake, E.L. and Njå, O. (2009) Perceptions and performances of experienced incident commanders. Journal of Risk Research 12 (5): 665–685.
Rosa, E.A. (1998) Metatheorethical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research 1 (1): 15–44.
Rosenthal, U. (1986) Crisis decision making in the Netherlands. Netherlands’ Journal of Sociology 22: 103–129.
Rosenthal, U., Boin, R.A. and Comfort, L.K. (eds.) (2001) Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Rosenthal, U., Charles, M.T. and Hart, P.t. (eds.) (1989a) Coping with Crises: The Management of Disasters, Riots, and Terrorism. Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.
Rosenthal, U., Hart, P.t. and Charles, M.T. (eds.) (1989b) The world of crises and crisis management. In: Coping with Crises: The Management of Disasters, Riots, and Terrorism. Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas, pp. 3–33.
Rothman, K.J., Greenland, S. and Lash, T. (2008) Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
Rundmo, T. and Iversen, H. (2004) Risk perception and driving behaviour among adolescents in two Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign. Safety Science 42 (1): 1–21.
Sommer, M. and Njå, O. (2011) Learning amongst Norwegian fire-fighters. Journal of Workplace Learning 23 (7): 435–455.
Watson, S.R. (1994) The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 45: 261–269.
WHO. (1986) Ottawa charter for health promotion. First International Conference on Health Promotion Ottawa, 21 November 1986 – WHO/HPR/HEP/95.1, http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ottawa_charter_hp.pdf, accessed 31 March 2010.
WHO. (2009) Indicators for international safe communities, http://www.phs.ki.se/csp/pdf/indicator09/indicators_international_sc.pdf, accessed 31 March 2010.
Yin, R.K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
About this article
Cite this article
Braut, G., Rake, E., Aanestad, R. et al. Risk images as basis for decisions related to provision of public services. Risk Manag 14, 60–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2011.18
- risk image
- fateful moments
- risk and vulnerability analysis
- decision making