Making whiteness matter: The King of Tars
- 176 Downloads
While many critics read the King of Tars’s white bodies as the a priori ground of the text’s racial-religious identities, I maintain that the narrative’s whiteness is more malleable and unstable. This interpretation attends to the historical and cultural logic that gave rise to The King of Tars’s iteration of racialized bodies. Considering historical connections between this narrative and Christian exchanges with Mongols in the decades before the text’s composition suggests that the narrative recuperates distinct racial hierarchies precisely where they were indeterminate historically, while retaining traces of that racial plasticity in its fantasized white bodies. The text materializes the period’s desires to expand Christendom, even figuratively, and to reify unstable racial identifications instantiated by conversions real and fantasized. Illuminating the traces of a constructed white racial body draws whiteness into the text’s production of racial-religious identities – via ideological and performative plasticity – that heretofore have adhered exclusively to readings of black bodies in the narrative.
Sincere thanks to Cord Whitaker and the anonymous reviewers of this article for their insightful and gracious comments. And thanks as well to Doug Sugano for years of mentoring, even from afar.
- Anonymous. 1964. Chronicle of Bury St. Edmonds 1212–1301, ed. and trans. A. Gransden. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
- Anonymous. 2003. Guy of Warwick, eds. D. Burnley and A. Wiggins. In The Auchinleck Manuscript Project. National Library of Scotland. http://auchinleck.nls.uk/mss/guy_cp.html.
- Calkin, S.B. 2005a. Marking Religion on the Body: Saracens, Categorization, and the King of Tars. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 104 (2): 219–238.Google Scholar
- Calkin, S.B. 2005b. Saracens and the Making of English Identity: The Auchinleck Manuscript. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Calkin, S.B. 2011. Romance Baptisms and Theological Contexts in the King of Tars and Sir Ferumbras. In Medieval Romance, Medieval Contexts, eds. R. Purdie and M. Cichon, 105–119. Woodbridge, UK: Brewer.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J.J. 2003. Medieval Identity Machines. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. 1997. The Masked Philosopher. In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed. P. Rabinow, 321–328. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
- Friedman, J.B. 1981. The Monstrous Races in Medieval Art and Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Guibert of Nogent. 1879. Gesta Dei per Francos. In Receuils des Historiens des Croisades, Historiens Occidentaux. vol. 4. Paris, France: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
- Heng, G. 2003. Empire of Magic: Medieval Romance and the Politics of Cultural Fantasy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Holsinger, B. 1998. The Color of Salvation: Desire, Death, and the Second Crusade in Bernard of Clairvaux’s Sermon on the Song of Songs. In The Tongue of the Fathers: Gender and Ideology in Twelfth-Century Latin, eds. D. Townsend and A. Taylor, 102–123. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Hornstein, L.H. 1939. A Study of Historical and Folklore Sources of the King of Tars. PhD dissertation. New York University.Google Scholar
- Krause, F. 1888. Kleine Publicationen aus der Auchinleck-hs, XI: The King of Tars. Englische Studien 11: 1–62.Google Scholar
- Kruger, S. 1997. Conversion and Medieval Sexual, Religious, and Racial Categories. In Constructing Medieval Sexuality, eds. K. Lochrie, P. McCracken and J.A. Schultz, 158–179. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Lampert, L. 2010. Medieval Literature and Postcolonial Studies. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Middle English Dictionary. 2001. University of Michigan. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/.
- Perryman, J., ed. 1980. The King of Tars. In Auchinleck MS, Advocates 19.2.1. Heidelberg, Germany: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
- Uebel, M. 1996. Unthinking the Monster: Twelfth-Century Responses to Saracen Alterity. In Monster Theory: Reading Culture, ed. J.J. Cohen, 264–291. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Wright, F.A., trans. 1933. Letter 107: To Laeta. In Select Letters of St. Jerome, 339–371. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar