Exegetical history: Nazis at the round table

  • Martin Shichtman
  • Laurie A Finke
Article

Abstract

Some might argue that when Nazis fantasize themselves as medieval knights, they debase a beautiful, noble and innocent past. They might insist that this fantasy, which feeds a desire to see the male body as larger than life, this fetishizing of the body as armor and muscle, may be perverse, but the ideal – the chivalrous knight who pledged himself to honor, loyalty and brotherhood – should not be tarnished by that perversion. This essay, however, explores the possibility that there is, in all imaginings of the knight, always the potential for fascist desire. It suggests that there may be an unsavory kinship between the armored warriors of medieval Europe – even the romanticized armored warriors of King Arthur’s court – and the armored divisions of Nazi blitzkrieg. A fascist aesthetic is the darkness at the heart of Arthurian history, especially as it celebrates aggressive hypermasculinity mobilized in the service of a persecuting society intent upon domination.

References

  1. Benjamin, W. 1986. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, ed. H. Arendt, trans. H. Zohn, 217–251. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  2. Berenbaum, M. 1993. The World Must Know: The History of the Holocaust as Told in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Boswell, J. 1980. Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burns, E.J. 2002. Courtly Love Undressed: Reading Through Clothes in Medieval French Culture. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J.J. 2003. Medieval Identity Machines. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cohn, N. 1966. Warrant for Genocide: The Myth of the Jewish World-Conspiracy and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Fiedler, L. 1991. Why is the Grail Knight Jewish? A Passover Meditation. In Fiedler on the Roof: Essays on Literature and Jewish Identity, 85–102. Boston, MA: Godine.Google Scholar
  8. Finke, L.A. and M.B. Shichtman . 2004. King Arthur and the Myth of History. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  9. Finke, L.A. and M.B. Shichtman . 2009. Cinematic Illuminations: The Middle Ages on Film. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fradenburg, L.O. 1996. ‘Fulfild of Fairye’: The Social Meaning of Fantasy in the Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale. In The Wife of Bath: Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism, ed. P. Beidler, 205–220. Boston, MA: Bedford Books.Google Scholar
  11. Golomshtok, I. 1990. Totalitarian Art: In the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, Fascist Italy, and the People’s Republic of China. London: Collins Harvill.Google Scholar
  12. Höhne, H. 1972. The Order of the Death’s Head: The Story of Hitler’s SS, trans. R. Barry. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  13. Lampert, L. 2007. Why is this Knight Different from All Other Knights?: Jews, Anti-Semitism, and the Old French Grail Narratives. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 106 (2): 224–247.Google Scholar
  14. Melzer, R. 2004. In the Eye of a Hurricane: German Freemasonry in the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich. In Freemasonry in Context: History, Ritual, Controversy, eds. A. de Hoyos and S. Brent Morris, trans. J. Karnahl, 89–104. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, R.I. 1987. The Formation of Persecuting Society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Rauschning, H. 1940. The Voice of Destruction. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Rhodes, A. 1976. Propaganda. The Art of Persuasion: World War II. New York: Chelsea House Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Shichtman, M.B. 1992. Wagner and the Arthurian Tradition. In Approaches to Teaching the Arthurian Tradition, eds. M. Fries and J. Watson, 139–142. New York: MLA.Google Scholar
  19. Sontag, S. 1980. Under the Sign of Saturn. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  20. Theweleit, K. 1987. Male Fantasies, trans. S. Conway. 2 Vols. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wagner, R. [1892] 1966. Richard Wagner’s Prose Works, trans. W.A. Ellis. 6 Vols. New York: Bronde.Google Scholar
  22. Wiesel, E. [1968] 1995. A Plea for the Dead. In Art from the Ashes. A Holocaust Anthology, ed. L.L. Langer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Shichtman
    • 1
  • Laurie A Finke
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Jewish Studies and English Language and LiteratureEastern Michigan UniversityYpsilanti
  2. 2.Department of Women’s and Gender StudiesKenyon CollegeKenyon

Personalised recommendations