Advertisement

Unworking Milton: Steps to a georgics of the mind

  • Steven Swarbrick
Original Article

Abstract

Traditionally read as a poem about laboring subjects who gain power through abstract and abstracting forms of bodily discipline, John Milton’s Paradise Lost (1667, 1674) more compellingly foregrounds the erotics of the Garden as a space where humans and nonhumans intra-act materially and sexually. Following Christopher Hill, who long ago pointed to not one but two revolutions in the history of seventeenth-century English radicalism – the first, ‘the one which succeeded[,]… the protestant ethic’; and the second, ‘the revolution which never happened,’ which sought ‘communal property, a far wider democracy[,] and rejected the protestant ethic’ – I show how Milton’s Paradise Lost gives substance to ‘the revolution which never happened’ by imagining a commons, indeed a communism, in which human beings are not at the center of things, but rather constitute one part of the greater ecology of mind within Milton’s poem. In the space created by this ecological reimagining, plants assume a new agency. I call this reimagining ‘ecology to come.’

References

  1. Ackerman, D. 1990. A Natural History of the Senses. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, D. 2002. Cultivating Delight: A Natural History of My Garden. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  3. Agamben, G. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal, trans. K. Attell. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. 1984. De Anima (On the Soul). In The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume One, ed. J. Barnes, trans. J.A. Smith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bacon, F. [1605] 2002. The Advancement of Learning. In The Major Works, ed. B. Vickers, 120–299. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bateson, G. 2000. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bersani, L. 2008. Intimacies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burckhardt, J. 1958. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, trans. S.G.C. Middlemore. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  11. Césaire, A. 2000. Discourse on Colonialism, trans. J. Pinkham. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chakrabarty, D. 2009. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crashaw, R. [1646] 1974. Our Lord in His Circumcision. In The Complete Poetry of Richard Crashaw, ed. G.W. Williams, 9. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Daston, L. and K. Park . 2001. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari . 1994. What is Philosophy?, trans. H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, G. 2001. Pure Immanence: Essays on a Life, trans. A. Boyman. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  17. Derrida, J. 1981. Dissemination, trans. B. Johnson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Derrida, J. 1995. Eating Well, or the Calculation of the Subject. In Points…: Interviews, 1974–1994, ed. E. Weber, trans. P. Kamuf. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Derrida, J. 2009. The Beast and the Sovereign, Volume 1, trans. G. Bennington. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dinshaw, C. 2012. How Soon Is Now? Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers, and the Queerness of Time. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doyle, R. 2010. Darwin’s Pharmacy: Sex, Plants, and the Evolution of the Noösphere. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  22. Feerick, J.E. and V. Nardizzi . 2012. Introduction: Swervings: On Human Indistinction. In The Indistinct Human in Renaissance Literature, eds. J.E. Feerick and V. Nardizzi, 1–12. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fish, S. 1998. Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fish, S. 2001. How Milton Works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. 1997a. The Masked Philosopher. In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed. P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley, 321–328. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. 1997b. What is Enlightenment? In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed. P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley, 303–319. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. 2005. The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981–1982, ed. F. Gros, trans. G. Burchell. New York: Picador.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerard, J. 1597. The Herball or Generall Historie of Plantes. London: Iohn Norton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goldberg, J. 2009. The Seeds of Things: Theorizing Sexuality and Materiality in Renaissance Representations. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grazia, M., de, M. Quilligan and P. Stallybrass . 1996. Introduction. In Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture, eds. M. de Grazia, M. Quilligan and P. Stallybrass, 1–16. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gregerson, L. 1995. The Reformation of the Subject: Spenser, Milton, and the English Protestant Epic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grosz, E. 2008. Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Guillory, John 1995. Milton, Narcissism, Gender: On the Genealogy of Male Self-Esteem. In Critical Essays on John Milton, ed. C. Kendrick, 194–233. New York: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Hallé, F. 2002. In Praise of Plants, trans. D. Lee. Portland, OR: Timber Press.Google Scholar
  35. Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  36. Harkness, D.E. 2007. Living on Lime Street: ‘English’ Natural History and the European Republic of Letters. In The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Harris, J.G. 2009. Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heise, U.K. 2008. Sense of Planet and Sense of Place: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Helmreich, S. 2011. What Was Life? Answers from Three Limit Biologies. Critical Inquiry 37 (4): 676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hiltner, K. 2003. Milton and Ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuzner, J. 2009. Habermas Goes to Hell: Pleasure, Public Reason, and the Republicanism of Paradise Lost. Criticism 51 (1): 105–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lacan, J. 2006. The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function. In Écrit, trans. B. Fink, 75–81. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  43. Lewalski, B. 1979. Protestant Poetics and the Seventeenth-Century Religious Lyric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, C.G. 2010. Milton among the Puritans: The Case for Historical Revisionism. Farnham and Burlington, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  45. Martz, L. 1954. The Poetry of Meditation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Massumi, B. 2011. Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurrent Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. McColley, D. 1983. Milton’s Eve. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  48. Milton, J. [1645] 2008. Sonnet 7. In The Major Works, eds. S. Orgel and J. Goldberg, 34–35. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Milton, J. [1667] 2008. Paradise Lost. In The Major Works, eds. S. Orgel and J. Goldberg, 355–618. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Morton, T. 2007. Ecology without Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Morton, T. 2010. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mulvey, L. 1975. Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen 16 (3): 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nagel, A. and C.S. Wood . 2010. Anachronic Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  54. Nancy, J.L. 1991. The Inoperative Community, ed. and trans. P. Connor. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  55. Norbrook, D. 1999. Writing the English Republic: Poetry, Rhetoric and Politics, 1627–1660. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Ogilvie, B.W. 2006. The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Parrish, S.S. 2006. American Curiosity: Cultures of Natural History in the Colonial British Atlantic World. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  58. Parker, P. 1979. Inescapable Romance: Studies in the Poetics of a Mode. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Picciotto, J. 2005. Reforming the Garden: Experimentalist Eden and Paradise Lost. ELH 72 (1): 23–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Picciotto, J. 2010. Labors of Innocence in Early Modern England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rogers, J. 1996. The Matter of Revolution: Science, Poetry, and Politics in the Age of Milton. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Scarry, E. 2001. Dreaming by the Book. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Schiebinger, L. 2004. Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Schiebinger, L. and C. Swan . 2005. Introduction. In Colonial Botany: Science, Commerce, and Politics in the Early Modern World, eds. L. Schiebinger and C. Swan. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  65. Schoenfeldt, M. 2000. Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England: Physiology and Inwardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert, and Milton. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Shaviro, S. 2009. Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, M. 2009. Against Ecological Sovereignty: Agamben, Politics and Globalization. Environmental Politics 18 (1): 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stengers, I. 2010. Cosmopolitics I, trans. R. Bononno. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  69. Teskey, G. 2006. Delirious Milton: The Fate of the Poet in Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thacker, E. 2010. After Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whitehead, A.N. 1938. Modes of Thought. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Swarbrick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishBrown UniversityProvidence

Personalised recommendations