Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 179–189 | Cite as

Hating government and voting against one’s interests: Self-Transgression, enjoyment, critique

  • Jason Glynos
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Section: Psychosocial Effects of Neoliberalism, Part II

Abstract

The psychoanalytic contribution to our understanding of hating government and voting against our own interests can be appreciated by invoking the categories of fantasy and enjoyment. Essential to the psychoanalytic enterprise is the idea that there is no necessary relation between a subject’s investment in a fantasmatic narrative and how faithfully this narrative reflects a consensus reality. As a prominent narrative element in political discourse, ‘big government’ can thus play for the subject two analytically distinct roles: an ideological role (linked to our fantasmatic investment in the world) and an epistemological role (linked to our understanding of the world). I argue that an appeal to fantasy not only helps us better grasp this difference in roles, but also enables us to appreciate its social and political implications.

Keywords

self-transgression enjoyment fantasy ideology orthogonality critique 

References

  1. Chang, W.-Y. and Glynos, J. (2011) Ideology and politics in the popular press. In: L. Dahlberg and S. Phelan (eds.) Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Connolly, W. (2008) Capitalism and Christianity, American Style. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fink, B. (1997) A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Frank, T. (2004) What’s the Matter with Kansas? New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  5. Frank, T. (2012) Pity the Billionaire. New York: Harvill Secker.Google Scholar
  6. Gallie, W.B. (1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LVI: 167–198.Google Scholar
  7. Glynos, J. (2001) There is no other of the other: Symptoms of a decline in symbolic faith. Paragraph 24 (2): 78–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glynos, J. (2003) Self-Transgression and freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glynos, J. (2008) Self-transgressive enjoyment as a freedom fetter. Political Studies 56 (3): 679–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glynos, J. (2014) Death, fantasy, and the ethics of mourning. In: N. Carpentier and L. Van Brussel (eds.) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Social Construction of Death. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Kuhn, T. (1969) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Lacan, J. (1992) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis (1959-60). New York: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  13. Laclau, E. (1991) The impossibility of society. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 15 (1/3): 24–27.Google Scholar
  14. Lakoff, G. (2008) The Political Mind. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  15. Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J.B. (1988) The Language of Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  16. Layton, L. (2010) Irrational exuberance: Neoliberal subjectivity and the perversion of truth. Subjectivity 3 (3): 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosen, M. (2000) On voluntary servitude and the theory of ideology. Constellations 7 (3): 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Žižek, S. (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. Žižek, S. (1994) The Metastases of Enjoyment. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Glynos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GovernmentUniversity of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations