Advertisement

Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 281–301 | Cite as

Psychosocial research analysis and scenic understanding

  • Lynn Froggett
  • Wendy Hollway
Original Article

Abstract

In this paper two researchers who position themselves within an emergent psychosocial current in the UK apply the concept of scenic understanding to a segment of film footage of an interaction (part of an empirical qualitative research project) to explore what Alfred Lorenzer's theory can add to our existing methodological resources. The film footage shows the creation of a poem by Darren, a 16-year-old offender, and Bob, a local poet employed in a project investigating the rehabilitative potential of one-to-one creative writing sessions. The authors contrast the transcript of this encounter with a ‘scenic composition’, a device they developed to communicate to a research readership the scenic experience of watching a filmed interaction. This contrast forms the basis for bringing together a series of post-Kleinian ideas about modes of knowing (syncretistic perception, reverie, transitional space) with Lorenzer's scenic understanding. Using the idea of provocations in the text, the authors focus on the researcher's emotional experience to explore the psychosocial character of the meanings that emerge concerning Darren's claim, ‘I’m not clever’, and how these meanings are communicated amongst Darren, Bob and the researcher. Through the lens of symbolised and unsymbolised emotional experience, play and triangular space, the authors consider Darren's ambivalent relationship to the creative writing activity and conclude with a short discussion of the conceptualisation of unconscious processes suitable to a psychosocial data analytic methodology.

Keywords

Lorenzer scenic understanding interaction forms psychosocial method experience-near symbolization 

References

  1. Alford, C.F. (1989) Melanie Klein and Critical Social Theory: An Account of Politics, Art and Reason Based on Her Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bion, W.R. (1962) Learning from Experience. London: Maresfield.Google Scholar
  3. Bion, W.R. (1967) Second Thoughts. London: Maresfield.Google Scholar
  4. Bion, W.R. (1970) Attention and Interpretation. London: Maresfield.Google Scholar
  5. Bollas, C. (1989) Forces of Destiny: Psychoanalysis and the Human Idiom. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bollas, C. (1992) Being a Character: Psychoanalysis and Self Experience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Britton, R. (1993) The missing link: Parental sexuality in the Oedipus complex. In: D. Breen (ed.) The Gender Conundrum. London: Routledge, pp. 82–94.Google Scholar
  8. Britton, R. (1998) Belief and Imagination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Ehrenzweig, A. (1967/1970) The Hidden Order of Art. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  10. Farrier, A., Froggett, L. and Poursanidou, K. (2009) Offender based restorative justice and poetry: Reparation or wishful thinking? Youth Justice 9 (1): 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Froggett, L. (2007) Arts based learning in restorative youth justice: Embodied, moral and aesthetic. Journal of Social Work Practice 21 (2): 249–361.Google Scholar
  12. Froggett, L. (2008) Artistic output as intersubjective third. In: S. Clarke, H. Hahn and P. Hoggett (eds.) Object Relations and Social Relations: The Implications of the Relational Turn in Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac Books, pp. 87–111.Google Scholar
  13. Froggett, L., Farrier, A. and Poursanidou, K. (2007) Making sense of Tom: Seeing the reparative in restorative justice. Journal of Social Work Practice 21 (1): 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geertz, C. (1974) From the native's point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28 (1): 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hollway, W. (2009) Applying the “experience-near” principle to research: Psychoanalytically informed methods. Journal of Social Work Practice 23 (4): 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollway, W. (2010) Conflict in the transitions to becoming a mother: A psycho-social approach. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 15 (2): 136–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keats, J. (1817, 2009) Letter to brothers, http://www.mrbauld.com/negcap.html, accessed 21 December 2009.
  18. Langer, S.K. (1942, 1990) Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lorenzer, A. (1977) Sprachspiel und Interaktionsformen: Vorträge und Aufsätze zu Psychoanalyse, Sprache und Praxis. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  20. Lorenzer, A. (1986) Tiefenhermeneutische Kulturanalyse. In: A. Lorenzer (ed.) Kultur-Analysen: Psychoanalytische Studien zur Kultur. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer, pp. 11–98.Google Scholar
  21. Ogden, T. (2004) On holding and containing, being and dreaming. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 85: 1349–1364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Winnicott, D.W. (1971, 2005) Playing and Reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychosocial Research Unit, International School for Communities, Rights and Inclusion, Harrington Building, University of Central LancashirePrestonUK
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentOpen UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations