Abstract
Widely acknowledged as an inspiration and early model for the British object relations school, Ian Suttie's work illustrates both the school's advantages and its pitfalls. Suttie's work includes a core concept of matriarchy as the social order best suited for healthy upbringing. As object relations theory has attracted both praise and criticism from feminists for its perceptions of gender and the family, examining Suttie's notion of matriarchy may serve as a test case for the relationist approach to gender and its links to wider political questions. I argue that Suttie provides some insights that will later be appropriated and further developed by key feminist thinkers. His position, however, implies an essentialist foundation that makes family relations hierarchic and non-negotiable. The structured household and its gendered division of labor is the cornerstone of Suttie's utopia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacal, H.A. (1990) Ian Suttie. In: H.A. Bacal and K.M. Newman (eds.) Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 17–27.
de Beauvoir, S. (1989) The Second Sex. New York: Vintage.
Benjamin, J. (1988) The Bonds of Love. New York: Pantheon.
Budd, S. (2001) No sex please – we’re British: Sexuality in English and French psychoanalysis. In: C. Harding (ed.) Sexuality: Psychoanalytic Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 52–68.
Campbell, J. (2000) Arguing with the Phallus. London: Zed.
Chodorow, N. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clarke, G.S. (2006) Personal Relations Theory. London: Routledge.
Doane, J. and Hodges, D. (1992) From Klein to Kristeva. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Flax, J. (1993) Disputed Subjects. London: Routledge.
Franzblau, S. (1999) Historicizing attachment theory: Binding the ties that bind. Feminism and Psychology 9: 22–31.
Freud, S. (1925, 1961) Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 241–258.
Freud, S. (1930, 1961) Civilization and its discontents. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 21. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 59–145.
Frosh, S. (1994) Sexual Difference. London: Routledge.
Gerson, G. (2004) Winnicott, participation, and gender. Feminism and Psychology 14: 561–581.
Gomez, L. (1997) An Introduction to Object Relations. New York: New York University Press.
Gordon, S. (2002) The origins of love and hate revisited. In: D. Mann (ed.) Love and Hate. London: Brunner-Routledge, pp. 111–124.
Greenberg, J.R. and Mitchell, S.A. (1983) Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greer, G. (2002) The Female Eunuch. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.
Hamer, M. (2002) Incest – A New Perspective. Cambridge: Polity.
Heard, D. (1999) Introduction. In: I.D. Suttie (ed.) The Origins of Love and Hate. London: Free Association Books, pp. x–l.
Hobbes, T. (1996) Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holmes, J. (1993) John Bowlby and Attachment Theory. London: Routledge.
Hughes, J.M. (1989) Reshaping the Psychoanalytic Domain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kirkwood, C. (2005) The persons-in-relation perspective: Sources and synthesis. In: J.S. Scharff and D.E. Scharff (eds.) The Legacy of Fairbairn and Sutherland. London: Routledge, pp. 19–38.
MacKinnon, C. (1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Minsky, R. (1996) Psychoanalysis and Gender. London: Routledge.
Mitchell, S.A. and Black, M.J. (1995) Freud and Beyond. New York: Basic Books.
Okin, S.M. (1989) Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.
Richards, G. (2000) Psychology and the churches in Britain 1919–39: Symptoms of conversion. History of the Human Sciences 13: 57–84.
Riley, D. (1983) War in the Nursery. London: Virago.
Ruddick, S. (1990) Maternal Thinking. London: Women's Press.
Suttie, I.D. (1928) The evolution of social thought. Psyche 33: 31–36.
Suttie, I.D. (1932) Religion: Racial character and mental and social health. British Journal of Medical Psychology 12: 299–314.
Suttie, I.D. (1933) A common standpoint and foundation for psychopathology. Journal of Mental Science 79: 18–26.
Suttie, I.D. (1935a, 1999) The Origins of Love and Hate. London: Free Association Books.
Suttie, I.D. (1935b) Mental factors in the welfare of the child. Public Health 48: 294–301.
Suttie, I.D. and Suttie, J.I. (1932) The mother: Agent or object? Part II. British Journal of Medical Psychology 12: 199–233.
Tolmacz, R. (2006) Concern – A comparative look. Psychoanalytic Psychology 23: 143–158.
Winnicott, D.W. (1971, 1997) Playing and Reality. London: Routledge.
Winnicott, D.W. (1986) Home is where we start from. In: C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd and M. Davis (comp. and eds.) Home Is Where We Start From: Essays by a Psychoanalyst. New York and London: Norton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerson, G. Ian Suttie's matriarchy: A feminist utopia?. Psychoanal Cult Soc 14, 375–392 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2008.38
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2008.38