Place Branding and Public Diplomacy

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 204–215

Tweeting the pivot? The United States and PD 2.0 in Northeast Asia

Original Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

This study considers US public diplomacy efforts in Northeast Asia in the context of the country’s foreign policy ‘pivot’ toward the region. Focused specifically on American efforts to communicate online with publics in China, Japan and South Korea, this research examines embassy social media feeds in order to characterize the most visible aspects of American PD 2.0 in the region. Findings indicate that despite the interactive potential of these online tools, the US approach to public diplomacy in the online context remains overwhelmingly unilateral, with one-way messaging the norm and instances of engagement with the target publics exceedingly rare. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

public diplomacy 2.0 relationship management Northeast Asia United States 

References

  1. Banks, R. (2011) A Resource Guide to Public Diplomacy Evaluation. CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.Google Scholar
  2. Botan, C.H. and Taylor, M. (2004) Public relations: State of the field. Journal of Communication 54 (4): 645–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briones, R.L., Kuch, B., Liu, B.F. and Jin, Y. (2011) Keeping up with the digital age: How the American red cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review 37 (1): 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Capriotti, P. and Moreno, A. (2007) Corporate citizenship and public relations: The importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate websites. Public Relations Review 33 (1): 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clinton, H. (2011) America’s pacific century. Foreign Policy 189 (1): 56–63.Google Scholar
  6. Comor, E. and Bean, H. (2012) America’s ‘engagement’ delusion: Critiquing a public diplomacy consensus. International Communication Gazette 74 (3): 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cull, N.J. (2008) Public diplomacy: Taxonomies & histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cull, N.J. (2013) The long road to public diplomacy 2.0: The internet in US public diplomacy. International Studies Review 15 (1): 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Entman, R.M. (2008) Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. The International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (2): 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzpatrick, K.R. (2007) Advancing the new public diplomacy: A public relations perspective. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2 (3): 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitzpatrick, K.R. (2011) US Public Diplomacy in a Post-9/11 World: From Messaging to Mutuality. CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fulton, B. (2005) Net Diplomacy III: 2015 and Beyond. Virtual Diplomacy Series, No. 16. United States Institute of Peace. Available at: http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/Net%20Diplomacy%20III_%202015%20and%20Beyond_%20Pt1.pdf.
  13. Gilboa, E. (2008) Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ginneken, J. (2007) 9/11 as a trigger for long-term shifts in world public opinion. The International Communication Gazette 69 (4): 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glassman, J.K. (2008) Public Diplomacy 2.0: A New Approach to Global Engagement. Washington DC: New America Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Graffy, C. (2009) The rise of public diplomacy 2.0. The Journal of International Security Affairs 9 (17):, http://www.securityaffairs.org/issues/2009/17/graffy.php.
  17. Gregory, B. (2008) Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 616 (1): 274–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grunig, J.E. and Huang, Y.H. (2000) From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationships outcomes. In: J. Ledingham and S. Bruning (eds.) Public Relations as Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to the Study and Practice of Public Relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 23–53.Google Scholar
  19. Hanson, F. (2012) Revolution @ State: The Spread of Ediplomacy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  20. Hayden, C. (2012) Social media at state: Power, practice, and conceptual limits for US public diplomacy. Global Media Journal – American Edition 11 (21), http://journals.textual.info/index.php/gmj-american/article/view/7.Google Scholar
  21. Hayden, C. (2013) Logics of narrative and networks in US public diplomacy: Communication power and US strategic engagement. Journal of International Communication 19 (2): 196–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingenhoff, D. and Koelling, A.M. (2009) The potential of web sites as a relationship building tool for charitable fundraising NPOs. Public Relations Review 35 (1): 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kang, S. and Norton, H.E. (2004) Nonprofit organizations' use of the World Wide Web: Are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals? Public Relations Review 30 (3): 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelleher, T. and Miller, B.M. (2006) Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2): 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kent, M.L. (2008) Critical analysis of blogging in public relations. Public Relations Review 34 (1): 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kent, M.L. and Taylor, M. (1998) Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review 24 (3): 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khatib, L., Dutton, W. and Thelwall, M. (2012) Public diplomacy 2.0: A case study of the US digital outreach team. Middle East Journal 66 (3): 454–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kruckeberg, D. and Vujnovic, M. (2005) Public relations, not propaganda, for US public diplomacy in a post-9/11 world: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Communication Management 9 (4): 296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Language Difficulty Ranking. (2014) Effective language learning, http://www.effectivelanguagelearning.com/language-guide/language-difficulty, accessed 1 October 2014.
  30. Lee, H.M. and Jun, J.W. (2013) Explicating public diplomacy as organization–public relationship (OPR): An empirical investigation of OPRs between the US embassy in Seoul and South Korean college students. Journal of Public Relations Research 25 (5): 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lichtenstein, J. (2010) Digital diplomacy. New York Times Magazine 16 July: 26–29, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/magazine/18web2-0-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
  32. Lovejoy, K., Waters, R.D. and Saxton, G.D. (2012) Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review 38 (2): 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Melissen, J. (ed.) (2006) The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice. In: The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
  34. Metzgar, E.T. (2012) The medium is not the message: Social media, American public diplomacy, & Iran. Global Media Journal – American Edition 11 (21): 1–16.Google Scholar
  35. Metzgar, E.T. and Hayden, C. (2012) The state of public diplomacy research. A presentation to the U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/219029.pdf.
  36. Men, L.R. and Tsai, W.H.S. (2011) How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States. Public Relations Review. 38 (5): 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naude, A.M., Froneman, J.D. and Atwood, R.A. (2004) The use of the internet by ten South African non-governmental organizations – A public relations perspective. Public Relations Review 30 (1): 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newsom, V.A. and Lengel, L. (2012) Framing messages of democracy through social media: Public diplomacy 2.0, gender, and the Middle East and North Africa. Global Media Journal – American Edition 11 (21): 1–18.Google Scholar
  39. Obama, B. (2009) National Framework for Strategic Communication. Washington DC: The White House.Google Scholar
  40. Ross, A. (2011) Digital diplomacy and U.S. foreign policy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 6 (3–4): 451–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ross, A. (2012) How connective tech boosts political change. CNN 20 June, http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/20/opinion/opinion-alec-ross-tech-politics/index.html.
  42. Rugh, W.A. (2014) Front Line Diplomacy: How U.S. Embassies Communicate with Foreign Publics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rybalko, S. and Seltzer, T. (2010) Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using twitter. Public Relations Review 36 (4): 336–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott, B. (2004) Multiculturalism for the masses: Social advertising and public diplomacy post-9/11. Intercultural communication and diplomacy Washington International Social Science Journal 50 (156): 289–301.Google Scholar
  45. Scott-Smith, G. (2009) Exchange programs and public diplomacy. In: N. Snow and P.M. Taylor (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge, pp. 50–56.Google Scholar
  46. Seo, H. (2009) How the internet changes public diplomacy: A case study of online community run by US embassy in South Korea. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL, 21 May.Google Scholar
  47. Seo, H. and Kinsey, D.F. (2013) Three Korean perspectives on US internet public diplomacy. Public Relations Review 39 (5): 594–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shirky, C. (2011) The political power of social media. Foreign Affairs 90 (1): 28–41.Google Scholar
  49. Slaughter, A.M. (2009) America’s edge, power in a networked century. Foreign Affairs 88 (1): 94–113.Google Scholar
  50. Social, Digital and Mobile Worldwide. (2014) We are social, http://wearesocial.net/blog/2014/01/social-digital-mobile-worldwide-2014/, accessed 1 October 2014.
  51. Social Media is Changing Diplomacy. (2014) PennState News. Pennsylvania State University, 7 October, available at: http://news.psu.edu/story/329204/2014/10/07/academics/social-media-changing-diplomacy-state-department-official-tells.
  52. Taylor, M., Kent, M.L. and White, W.J. (2001) How activist organizations are using the internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review 27 (3): 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tuch, H. (1990) Communicating with the World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. U.S. Department of State. (2010) 21st century statecraft, http://www.state.gov/statecraft/overview/index.htm, accessed 1 October 2014.
  55. U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy. (2014) Data Driven Public Diplomacy: Progress towards Measuring the Impact of Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting Activities. Washington DC: U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.Google Scholar
  56. United States Department of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors Office of the Inspector General. (2013) Inspection of the Bureau of International Information Programs. Report ISP-I-13-28, http://oig.state.gov/documents/organization/211193.pdf.Google Scholar
  57. Vanc, A.M. (2012) Post-9/11 US public diplomacy in Eastern Europe: Dialogue via new technologies or face-to-face communication? Global Media Journal – American Edition 11 (21).Google Scholar
  58. Wang, J. (2007) Telling the American story to the world: The purpose of U.S. public diplomacy in historical perspective. Public Relations Review 33 (1): 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Waters, R.D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A. and Lucas, J. (2009) Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review 35 (2): 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xifra, J. and McKie, D. (2012) From realpolitik to noopolitik: The public relations of (stateless) nations in an information age. Public Relations Review 38 (5): 819–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yun, S. (2006) Toward public relations theory-based study of public diplomacy: Testing the applicability of the excellence study. Journal of Public Relations Research 18 (4): 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yun, S. (2008) Cultural consequences on excellence in public diplomacy. Journal of Public Relations Research 20 (2): 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zaharna, R.S. and Rugh, W.A. (2012) Issue theme: The use of social media in US public diplomacy. Global Media Journal – American Edition 11 (21), http://journals.textual.info/index.php/gmj-american/article/view/5.Google Scholar
  64. Zhong, X. and Lu, J. (2011) Public diplomacy in the era of Web 2.0: The study of US embassy’s public diplomacy in China. Presented at Communication for Sustainable Social Change Conference: The Future of US-Chinese Media Communication and Public Diplomacy in a Post-Crisis World, August, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
  65. Zhong, X. and Lu, J. (2013) Public diplomacy meets social media: A study of the US embassy’s blogs and micro-blogs. Public Relations Review 39 (5): 542–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of JournalismIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations