Skip to main content
Log in

Developing a Risk Profile and Model Regulatory System for the Security Industry

  • Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a theory and policy paper that examines the security industry in order to develop a model form of regulation with cross-jurisdictional application. It begins by outlining the need for regulation based on a risk profile for conduct and standards of work. Different types of regulation are then reviewed – including civil and criminal law, market forces and self-regulation – elaborating on previous evaluations. The focus is then placed on the need to refine modern systems of government regulation through licensing. The core of these systems involves mandated entry-level competencies (via prescribed training) and disqualifying offences (via criminal history checks). These requirements and many other elements of regulation are, however, currently applied in highly variable ways. The paper emphasizes the need for consistent standards and the inclusion of a range of “advanced” regulatory strategies for improved monitoring and professional development. It concludes by proposing a comprehensive model of what has come to be known as “smart regulation” that seeks to balance the needs and interests of the different groups holding a stake in security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BJA (2005) Engaging the Private Sector to Promote Homeland Security. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Department of Justice.

  • Button, M. and George, B. (2006) Regulation of Private Security: Models for Analysis. In Gill, M. (ed.) Handbook of Security. Houndmills, Hampshire: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp 563–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., Park, H. and Lee, J. (2006) The Private Security Industry in South Korea: A Familiar Tale of Growth, Gaps and the Need for Better Regulation. Security Journal. Vol. 10, pp 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., Ortiz, C., Dadush, S., Irish, J., Alvarado, A. and Davis, D. (2003) The Public Accountability of Private Police: Lessons from New York, Johannesburg, and Mexico City. Policing and Society. Vol. 13, pp 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waard, J. (1999) The Private Security Industry in International Perspective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. Vol. 7, pp 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, B. and Button, M. (1997) Private Security Regulation – Lessons from Abroad for the United Kingdom. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention. Vol. 2, pp 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, B. and Button, M. (2000) Private Security. Leicester: Perpetuity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N. and Grabosky, P. (1999) Smart Regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmens, C., Maahs, J., Scarborough, K. and Collins, P. (2001) Watching the Watchmen: State Regulation of Private Security 1982–1998. Security Journal. Vol. 14, pp 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, D. (2003) The Role of Government in Regulating, Auditing and Facilitating Private Policing in Late Modernity: The Canadian Experience. Paper presented at the In Search of Security Conference. Montreal, February.

  • Jaksa, J. (2004) Is the Guard Trained or Not? The Attempt to Legislate Security Guard Training in Michigan. Security Journal. Vol. 17, pp 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. (1992) The Rebirth of Private Policing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. and Shearing, C. (2003) Governing Security. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. and Newburn, T. (1998) Private Security and Public Policing. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. and Prenzler, T. (2003) Private Inquiry Agents: Ethical Challenges and Accountability. Security Journal. Vol. 16, pp 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, S., Hadfield, P., Hobbs, D. and Winlow, S. (2001) Accounting for Bouncers: Occupational Licensing as a Mechanism for Regulation. Criminology and Criminal Justice. Vol. 1, pp 363–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (1996) The Case Against Regulation. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention. Vol. 1, pp 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States (2004) Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. Washington, DC.

  • Prenzler, T. (2004) Security Industry Report Card. Paper presented to the National Security Industry Forum. Australian Security Industry Association Ltd., Melbourne, 20 April.

  • Prenzler, T. (2006) Growth, Scandal and Reform in the Australian Security Industry. Paper presented to the Sixth Australasian Security Research Symposium, Brisbane, 20–21 April.

  • Prenzler, T. and Hayes, H. (1999) An Evaluation of the Queensland Security Providers Act. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. Vol. 32, pp 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. (2003) Sources of Private Security Law. Canberra Law Review. Vol. 7, pp 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. and Prenzler, T. (1999) The Regulation of Private Policing: Reviewing Mechanisms of Accountability. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal. Vol. 1, pp 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. and Prenzler, T. (2000) The Relationship Between Police and Private Security: Models and Future Directions. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. Vol. 24, pp 92–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. and Prenzler, T. (2005) The Law of Private Security in Australia. Sydney: Thomson LBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, P. (2000) Powers and Accountability of Private Police. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. Vol. 8, pp 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. (2006) Liquid Security: Managing the Market for Crime Control. Criminology and Criminal Justice. Vol. 6, pp 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prenzler, T., Sarre, R. Developing a Risk Profile and Model Regulatory System for the Security Industry. Secur J 21, 264–277 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sj.8350064

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sj.8350064

Keywords

Navigation