Skip to main content
Log in

Expert Testimony Issues in the UK

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Courts in the UK do not apply stringent criteria to the qualifications or methodology of expert witnesses, but the expert must have skill or knowledge that relates to a matter outside the experience of the court. Evidence from security specialists will satisfy this test in some cases. In civil courts, the judges also have a wide discretionary power to exclude or restrict expert evidence in order to do justice without disproportionate expense. The appointment of single joint experts, and the requirements for experts to discuss their reports with one another, have significantly modified the adversarial culture of the civil courts. Some recent criminal cases suggest that judges may be moving toward somewhat more rigorous scrutiny of expert evidence, but the adversarial procedures applied to expert evidence in the criminal courts remain substantially unchanged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, T. Expert Testimony Issues in the UK. Secur J 17, 41–49 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sj.8340176

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sj.8340176

Keywords

Navigation