Abstract
Over the past decade many ports, with the exception of the UK and New Zealand ports that were privatised, have introduced private participation in port operations through different forms of concession or lease agreements. One of the most common reasons for private participation was believed to be efficiency gains through the introduction of competition. However, the potential for creating private monopolies in most cases is contentious, because the investment in the cost structure of ports render them natural monopolies; if not dealt with carefully, this could give rise to anti-competitive behaviour. It is normally accepted that terminal operations in the ports of developed countries are contestable due to the size of the markets and the competition with adequately adjacent foreign ports. However, that is not the case in developing countries with low cargo volumes; remote countries that only serve natural hinterlands; and end ports on the north–south routes that are not located on existing major shipping networks. Most of these ports pursue private participation in order to generate funds for investment; increase efficiencies; and ensure cost-effective services. To avoid monopolistic behaviour in such cases, a sound regulatory framework is necessary, but without preventing commercial entrepreneurship. In this article, port reform and the issues regarding concessioning of terminals will be discussed along with the regulation needed, if free market competition does not already exist. The implications of concessioning under such circumstances of regulated competition will be discussed and applied to South Africa as an example.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, AJ . 1995: Privatisation of trust ports in the United Kingdom: Review and analysis of the first sales. Journal of Transport Policy 2: 135–143.
Baird, A.J . 2000: Port privatisation: Objectives, extent, process, and the UK experience. International Journal of Maritime Economics 11: 177–194.
Baumol, WJ, Panzer, JC and Willig, RD . 1982: Contestable markets and the theory of industrial structure. Harcourt Brace: Jovanovich.
Brooks, M . 2001: Good governance and ports as tools of economic development: Are they compatible?. Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference 2001, Hong Kong.
Clark, JM . 1940: Toward a concept of workable competition. American Economic Review 30: 241–256.
De Monie, G . 1994: Mission and role of port authorities. Proceedings of the World Port Privatisation Conference, London, 27–28 September.
Farell, S . 2002: The regulation of privatised ports: What are we trying to achieve?. Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference 2000, Panama.
Goethe, RW . 2003: Regulation of ports and multi-modal transportation. Proceedings of the Eighth National Maritime Conference 2003, South Africa, www.maritimeconference.co.za.
Goss, RO . 1999: On the distribution of economic rent in seaports. International Journal of Maritime Economics 1: 1–9.
Hodge, G . 1999: Privatisation – An international review of performance. Perseus Books: US. pp. 226–227.
Morgan, P . 2001: Privatisation of government businesses – who benefits? An Australian Perspective. Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference 2001, Hong Kong.
New Zealand, www.maritimelaw.orcon.net.nz.
Notteboom, T and Winkelmans, W . 2001: Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry. Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference 2001, Hong Kong.
Robinson, R . 2001: Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new Paradigm. Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference 2001, Hong Kong.
Saundry, R and Turnbull, P . 1997: Private profit public loss: The financial and economic performance of UK ports. Maritime Policy and Management 24: 319–334.
South Africa, Department of Public Enterprises. 2003, www.dpe.gov.za.
South Africa, National Department of Transport. 2003, www.ndot.gov.za.
United Kingdom, www.detr.gov.uk.
World Bank. 2003: Private sector private public database. www.worldbank.org.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Niekerk, H. Port Reform and Concessioning in Developing Countries. Marit Econ Logist 7, 141–155 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100129
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100129