Skip to main content
Log in

Process improvement (PI) programs and information systems: a cross-case analysis of impact

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

While much research has examined the use of information technology within process improvement (PI) programs, there has been a paucity of research examining the impact of such programs on information systems (ISs). The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of PI programs on ISs. The study involves case studies in four organizations that have implemented PI programs. The findings indicate that changes in ISs were not envisaged as being central to the PI programs. However, the implementation of the PI programs had a significant effect on the roles and responsibilities of those people impacted by the program. Information requirements changed as a consequence of these responsibility changes. ISs were found to make a significant contribution to meeting these new information requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The terms IS or IT personnel and IS or IT function are used to represent a variety of departmental names and job descriptions encountered throughout the study.

References

  • Allen, T.J. and Hauptman, O. (1987). The influence of communications technologies on organizational structure, Communication Research, October: 575–587.

  • Alter, C. and Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together, Sage Library of Social Research 191: 1–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C. (2001). The significance of context in information systems and organizational change, Information Systems Journal 11 (1): 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, G. (1997). The global supply chain information system: what it is and how we made it, Proceedings of the Tenth Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled Slovenia 9–11 June, pp: 93–111.

  • Baskerville, P and Smithson, S. (1995). Information technology and new organizational forms: choosing chaos over panaceas, European Journal of Information Systems 4: 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I. (1987). An Analysis of Research Methodologies, In: F.W. Mc Farlan (ed.) The Information Systems Research Challenge, Harvard Business School Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R. and Sambamurthy, V. (2002). Shaping up for E-commerce: institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of Web technologies. MIS Quarterly 26 (2): 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson-Thomas, C.J. (1994) Business Process Re-engineering: Myth and Reality, Kogan Page: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dampney, C.N.G. and Andrews, T. (1991). Striving for Sustained Competitive Advantage: The Growing Alignment of Information Systems and the Business, In: R. Clarke, and J. Cameron (eds.) Managing information Technology's Organizational Impact, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davamanirajan, P., Mukhopadhyay, T. and Kriebel, C.H. (2002). Assessing the business value of information technology in Global wholesale banking: the case of trade services, Journal of Organizational computing and Electronic Commerce 12 (1): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process Innovation: Re-engineering Work Through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H. and Short, J.E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign, Sloan Management Review Summer: 11–27.

  • Earl, M.J. (1989) Management Strategies for Information Technology, Prentice-Hall International: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, M.J. (1994). The new and old of business process redesign, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 3 (1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (2002). Has strategy changed? Sloan Management Review 43 (2): 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. (1990). Re-engineering work: don’t automate, obliterate, Harvard Business Review, July–August: 104–112.

  • Hayley, K., Plewa, J. and Watts, M. (1993). Re-engineering tops CIO menu, Datamation, April 15: 73–74.

  • Howard, M., Vidgen, R., Powell, P and Graves, A (2001). Planning for IS related industry transformation: the case of the 3DayCar, Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Information Systems, pp: 433–442.

  • Hughes, M and Golden, W. (2001). Intranet technology as an enabler of BPR: an exploratory study in public healthcare, Proceedings of the ninth European Conference on Information Systems pp: 1149–1158.

  • Keen, P.G.W. (1991). Shaping the Future: Business Design through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. (2001). Asynchronous and distributed process improvement: The role of collaborative technologies, Information Systems Journal 11 (2): 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. and van Dissel, H.G. (1996). MIS Quarterly 20 (3): 279–300.

  • Levinson, N.S. (1994). Interorganizational information systems: new approaches to global economic development, Information and Management 26: 257–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. (1989). Designing Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Inc., California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1995). The Great Transition: Using the Seven Disciplines of Enterprise Engineering to Align People, Technology, and Strategy, AMACOM: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage Publications, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C. and Coleman, H.J. (1992). Managing 21st century network organizations, Organizational Dynamics (Winter). American Management Association: New York, 20 (3): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1967). A Framework for Comparative Analysis of Organisations, American Sociological Review 32 (2): 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M.S. and DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the Use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration in: Organisations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (eds.), Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA, pp. 173–193.

  • Porter, M.E. and Miller, V.E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage, Harvard Business Review 63 (4): 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (2001). Strategy and the Internet, Harvard Business Review 79 (2): 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. (1992) The Intelligent Enterprise, Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. and Sales, C.A. (1994). Designing Organisations (4th ed.)., Richard Irwin, Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockart, J.F. and Short, J.E. (1989). IT in the 1990's: managing organizational interdependence, Sloan Management Review, Winter 2: 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.W. and Beath, C.M. (2002). New approaches to IT investment, Sloan Management Review 43 (2): 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott Morton, M.S. (ed.) (1991) The Corporation of the 1990's: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafeimidis, V. and Smithson, S. (2000). Information systems evaluation in practice: A case study of organizational change, Journal of Information Technology 15 (2): 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senn,, J (1991). Reshaping business processes through re-engineering, SIM Network, March–April: 4–6.

  • Stone, E. (1978). Research Methods in Organizational Behaviour, Goodyear Publishing Co.: California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talwar, R. (1993). Business re-engineering — a strategy driven approach, Long Range Planning 26 (6): 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. and Caston, A. (1993). Paradigm Shift: The New Promise of IT, McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, N (1991). IT-induced business reconfiguration. In: M.S. Scott Morton, (ed.) The Corporation of the 1990's: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J., Griffiths, P. and Whitmore, P. (1990). Strategic Planning for Information Systems, Wiley & Sons, Information Series: Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1965) Industrial Organisation: Theory and Practice, Tavistock, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications Inc.: California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Cunningham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cunningham, J., Finnegan, P. Process improvement (PI) programs and information systems: a cross-case analysis of impact. J Inf Technol 19, 59–70 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000003

Keywords

Navigation