Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 540–561 | Cite as

Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business

  • Gregory JacksonEmail author
  • Richard Deeg
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Part Special Issue: Institutions and International Business

Abstract

This paper examines the role of institutional analysis within the field of international business (IB) studies. Within IB, institutions matter, but the view of institutions tends to be “thin”, utilizing summary indicators rather than detailed description, and thus approaches institutions as unidimensional “variables” that impact on particular facets of business activity. This paper argues that IB research would be usefully advanced by greater attention to comparing the topography of institutional landscapes and understanding their diversity. A number of alternative case-based approaches are outlined that draw on a growing “comparative capitalisms” literature in sociology and political science. The paper develops a number of empirical examples to show the utility and limits of these approaches for IB scholars.

Keywords

comparative thinking case theoretic approaches institutional theory economic sociology business and society MNE–host country relations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Ruth Aguilera, Keith Brouthers, Tony Edwards, Anthony Ferner, Witold Henisz, Gary Herrigel, Mary O'Sullivan, Richard Whitley, and two anonymous reviewers for comments at various stages.

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V. 2005. Corporate governance and employment relations: Spain in the context of Western Europe. In H. Gospel and A. Pendleton (Eds), Corporate governance and labour management: An international comparison: 197–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28 (3): 447–465.Google Scholar
  3. Albert, M. 1993. Capitalism vs. capitalism: How America's obsession with individual achievement and short-term profit has led it to the brink of collapse. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, M. 2004. The varieties of capitalism paradigm: Not enough variety? Socio-Economic Review, 2 (1): 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amable, B. 2003. The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aoki, M. 1988. Information, incentives, and bargaining in the Japanese economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aoki, M. 1994. The Japanese firm as a system of attributes. In M. Aoki and R. Dore (Eds), The Japanese firm: Sources of competitive strength: 11–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aoki, M. 2001. Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Aoki, M., & Jackson, G. 2008. Understanding an emergent diversity of corporate governance and organizational architecture: An essentiality-based analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17 (1): dtm037.Google Scholar
  10. Aoki, M., Jackson, G., & Miyajima, H. 2007. Corporate governance in Japan: Institutional change and organizational diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arthur, W. B. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99 (394): 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. 1997. What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures? Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (4): 845–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bebchuk, L. A., & Roe, M. J. 1999. A theory of path dependence in corporate governance and ownership. Working Paper No. 131, Center for Law and Economic Studies, Columbia Law School.Google Scholar
  15. Berger, S., & The MIT Performance Center 2006. How we compete: What companies around the world are doing to make it in today's global economy. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  16. Biggart, N. W. 1991. Explaining Asian economic organization: Toward a Weberian institutional perspective. Theory and Society, 20 (2): 199–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blyth, M. 2003. Same as it never was: Temporality and typology in the varieties of capitalism. Comparative European Politics, 1 (2): 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Börsch, A. 2007. Global pressure, national system: How German corporate governance is changing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Boyer, R. 1997. French statism at the crossroads. In C. Crouch and W. Streeck (Eds), Political economy of modern capitalism: 71–101. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Boyer, R. 2004. New growth regimes, but still institutional diversity. Socio-Economic Review, 2 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brouthers, K. D. 2002. Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brouthers, K. D., & Barmossy, G. 1997. The role of key stakeholders in international joint venture negotiations: Case studies from Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (2): 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. 2001. Explaining the national cultural distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (1): 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Buck, T. W., & Shahrim, A. 2005. The translation of corporate governance changes across national cultures: The case of Germany. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (1): 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Campbell, J. L. 2004. Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Casper, S., & Kettler, H. 2001. National institutional frameworks and the hybridization of entrepreneurial business models: The German and UK biotechnology sectors. Industry and Innovation, 81 (1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Casper, S., & Whitley, R. 2004. Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: A comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden, and the UK. Research Policy, 33 (1): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chandler, A. D. 1990. Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Chui, A. C. W., Lloyd, A. E., & Kwok, C. C. Y. 2002. The determination of capital structure: Is national culture a missing piece to the puzzle? Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (1): 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Crouch, C. 2005. Capitalist diversity and change: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Crouch, C., & Streeck, W. 1997. Political economy of modern capitalism: Mapping convergence and diversity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Crouch, C., Streeck, W., Boyer, R., Amable, B., Hall, P. A., & Jackson, G. 2005. Dialogue on “Institutional complementarity and political economy”. Socio-Economic Review, 2 (4): 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Culpepper, P. 2005. Institutional change in contemporary capitalism: Coordinated financial systems since 1990. World Politics, 57 (2): 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Deeg, R. 2005. Change from within: German and Italian finance in the 1990s. In W. Streeck and K. Thelen (Eds), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies: 169–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. 2007. Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review, 5 (1): 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. De Jong, H. W. 1996. European capitalism: Between freedom and social justice. In W. Bratton, J. McCahery, S. Picciotto, and C. Scott (Eds), International regulatory competition and coordination: Perspectives on economic regulation in Europe and the United States: 185–206. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transaction, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (10): 915–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. 2000. Japanese firms' investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. 2003. Political hazards, experience and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (12): 1153–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, 2002. The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2003. The new comparative economics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31 (4): 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Djelic, M.-L. 1998. The post-war transformation of European business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Dore, R. 1973. British factory, Japanese factory: The origins of national diversity in industrial relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Dore, R. 2000. Stock market capitalism: Welfare capitalism: Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ebbinghaus, B. 1999. Does a European social model exist and can it survive? In G. Huemer, M. Mesch, and F. Traxler (Eds), The role of employer associations and labour unions in the EMU: Institutional requirements for European economic policies: 1–26. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  46. Edwards, T., Almond, P., Clark, I., Colling, T., & Ferner, A. 2005. Reverse diffusion in US multinationals: Barriers from the American business system. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (6): 1261–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Edwards, T., & Ferner, A. 2002. The renewed “American challenge”: A review of employment practice in US multinationals. Industrial Relations Journal, 33 (2): 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Edwards, T., & Ferner, A. 2004. Multinationals, reverse diffusion and national business systems. Management International Review, 24 (1): 51–81.Google Scholar
  49. Ferner, A., Almond, P., & Colling, T. 2004. Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: The case of “workforce diversity” in US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fiss, P. C. 2007. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32 (4): 1180–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. 2004. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49 (4): 501–534.Google Scholar
  52. Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. 2007. Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 13 (1): 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gaur, A. S., Delios, A., & Singh, K. 2007. Institutional environments, staffing strategies, and subsidiary performance. Journal of Management, 33 (4): 611–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Geppert, M., Williams, K., & Matten, D. 2003. The social construction of contextual rationalities in MNCs: An Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (3): 617–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79 (8): 137–147.Google Scholar
  56. Ghemawat, P. 2007. Managing differences: The central challenge of global strategy. Harvard Business Review, 85 (3): 59–68.Google Scholar
  57. Gourevitch, P. A., & Shinn, J. 2005. Political power and corporate control: The new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Goyer, M. 2006. Varieties of institutional investors and national models of capitalism: The transformation of corporate governance in France and Germany. Politics & Society, 34 (3): 399–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Greif, A. 2005. Institutions: Theory and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Guillén, M. F. 2005. The rise of Spanish multinationals: European business in the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. 2004. Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy: An empirical analysis. Discussion Paper, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  63. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds) 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hall, P. A., & Thelen, K. 2005. The politics of change in varieties of capitalism. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  65. Hancké, B., & Goyer, M. 2005. Degrees of freedom: Rethinking the institutional analysis of economic change. In G. Morgan, R. Whitley,and E. Moen (Eds), Changing capitalisms? Institutional change and systems of economic organization: 53–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Henisz, W. J. 2000. The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 16 (2): 334–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Henisz, W. J., & Williamson, O. E. 1999. Comparative economic organization – Within and between countries. Business and Politics, 1 (3): 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. 2005. Legitimacy, interest group pressures and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 30 (2): 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Herrigel, G. 1996. Industrial constructions: The sources of German industrial power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Herrigel, G., & Wittke, V. 2005. Varieties of vertical disintegration: The global trend toward heterogeneous supply relations and the reproduction of difference in US and German manufacturing. In G. Morgan, R. Whitley, and E. Moen (Eds), Changing capitalisms? Internationalization, institutional change, and systems of economic organization: 312–351. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Hollingsworth, J. R., & Boyer, R. 1997. Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hollingsworth, J. R., Schmitter, P. C., & Streeck, W. 1994. Governing capitalist economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Hollingsworth, J. R., & Streeck, W. 1994. Countries and sectors: Concluding remarks on performance, convergence, and competitiveness. In J. R. Hollingsworth, P.C. Schmitter, and W. Streeck (Eds), Governing capitalist economies: Performance and control of economic sectors: 270–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Holscher, J., Tomann, H., Lane, D., & Myant, M. (Eds) 2007. Varieties of capitalism in post-communist countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  76. Immergut, E. M. 1998. The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics and Society, 26 (1): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ingram, P., & Clay, K. 2000. The choice-within-constraints new institutionalism and implications for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ionascu, D., Meyer, K. E., & Estrin, S. 2004. Institutional distance and international business strategies in emerging economies. Working Paper, Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
  79. Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. 2006. Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100 (2): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. 2006. How many varieties of capitalism? Comparing the comparative institutional analyses of capitalist diversity. Discussion Paper 06/2, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  81. Jacoby, S. M. 2004. The embedded corporation: Corporate governance and employment relations in Japan and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Katzenstein, P. 1985. Small states in world markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Kenworthy, L. 2006. Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance. Socio-Economic Review, 4 (1): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2006. Emerging giants: Building world class companies in developing countries. Harvard Business Review, 84 (10): 60–69.Google Scholar
  85. Kogut, B., & Ragin, C. C. 2006. Exploring complexity when diversity is limited: Institutional complementarity in theories of rule of law and national systems revisited. European Management Review, 3 (1): 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kogut, B., MacDuffie, J. P., & Ragin, C. C. 2004. Prototypes and strategy: Assigning causal credit using fuzzy sets. European Management Review, 1 (2): 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 308–324.Google Scholar
  88. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Kristensen, P. H., & Zeitlin, J. 2005. Local players in global games: The strategic constitution of a multinational corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Lane, C. 2003. Changes in corporate governance of German corporations: Convergence to the Anglo-American model? Competition and Change, 7 (2–3): 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Lane, C., & Probert, J. 2006. Domestic capabilities and global production networks in the clothing industry: A comparison of German and UK firms' strategies. Socio-Economic Review, 4 (1): 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6): 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Lehrer, M. 2000. The organizational choice between evolutionary and revolutionary capability regimes: Theory and evidence from European air transport. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9 (3): 489–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lee, C., & Beamish, P. W. 1995. The characteristics and performance of Korean joint ventures in LDCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (3): 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Meyer, K. E. 2001. Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (2): 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Milgrom, P. R., & Roberts, J. 1990. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica, 58 (6): 1255–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Milgrom, P. R., & Roberts, J. 1994. Complementarities and systems: Understanding Japanese economic organization. Estudios Economicos, 9 (1): 3–42.Google Scholar
  98. Morgan, G., & Quack, S. 2005. Institutional legacies and firm dynamics: The growth and internationalization strategies of British and German law firms. Organization Studies, 26 (12): 1765–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Morgan, G., & Whitley, R. 2003. Introduction to special issue on the changing multinational firm. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (3): 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Morgan, G., Whitley, R., & Moen, E. (Eds) 2005. Changing capitalisms? Institutional change and systems of economic organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  102. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Orru, M., Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. 1997. The economic organization of East Asian capitalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  105. O'Sullivan, M. 2000. Contests for corporate control: Corporate governance and economic performance in the United States and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Pearce, J., Branyiczki, I., & Bigley, G. 2000. Insufficient bureaucracy: Trust and commitment in particularistic organizations. Organization Science, 11 (2): 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 275–296.Google Scholar
  108. Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 21 (2): 492–528.Google Scholar
  109. Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94 (2): 252–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Pistor, K. 2005. Legal ground rules in coordinated and liberal market economies. Law Working Paper No. 30, Brussels: European Corporate Governance Institute.Google Scholar
  112. Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Posner, E. 2005. Sources of institutional change: The supranational origins of Europe's new stock markets. World Politics, 58 (1): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Powell, W. W. 1991. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic and J. Mitchell (Eds), Markets, hierarchies, and networks: 265–276. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  115. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds) 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  116. Ragin, C. C., & Zaret, D. 1983. Theory and method in comparative research: Two strategies. Social Forces, 61 (3): 731–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Redding, G. 2005. The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (2): 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Rueda, D., & Pontusson, J. 2000. Wage inequality and varieties of capitalism. World Politics, 52 (3): 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Sabel, C. F. 1994. Learning by monitoring: The institutions of economic development. In N. J. Smelser and R. Sweberg (Eds), The handbook of economic sociology: 137–165. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Sako, M. 2005. Does embeddedness imply limits to within-country diversity? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43 (4): 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Schmidt, R. H., Hackethal, A., & Tyrell, M. 2002. The convergence of financial systems in Europe. Schmalenbach Business Review (special issue 1): 7–53.Google Scholar
  123. Schmidt, V. A. 2002. The futures of European capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. 2006. The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24 (3): 195–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Schwartz, S. H. 1994. Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values, In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitbibasi, S. C. Choi and G. Yoon (Eds), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications: 85–119. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  126. Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  127. Shonfield, A. 1965. Modern capitalism: The changing balance of public and private power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Sorge, A. 1991. Strategic fit and the societal effect: Interpreting cross-national comparisons of technology, organization and human resources. Organization Studies, 12 (2): 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Sorge, A. 2005. The global and the local: Understanding the dialectics of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Sorge, A., & Warner, M. 1986. Comparative factory organization: An Anglo-German comparison of manufacturing, management and manpower. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  131. Soskice, D. 1999. Divergent production regimes: Coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks and J. D. Stephens (Eds), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism: 101–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Stark, D., & Bruszt, L. 1998. Postsocialist pathways: Transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  133. Streeck, W. 1992. Social institutions and economic performance: Studies of industrial relations in advanced capitalist economies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  134. Streeck, W. 1996. Lean production in the German automobile industry: A test case for convergence theory. In S. Berger and R. Dore (Eds), National diversity and global capitalism: 138–170. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  135. Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (Eds) 1985. Private interest government: Beyond market and state. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  136. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (Eds) 2005. Beyond continuity: Explorations in the dynamics of advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  137. Streeck, W., & Yamamura, K. (Eds) 2001. The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Taylor, M. Z. 2004. Empirical evidence against varieties of capitalism's theory of technical innovation. International Organization, 58 (3): 601–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Thelen, K. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. American Review of Political Science, 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Thelen, K. 2004. How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. 2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Vitols, S. 2002. Shareholder value, management culture and production regimes in the transformation of the German chemical-pharmaceutical industry. Competition and Change, 6 (3): 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Vitols, S. 2005. Changes in Germany's bank-based financial system: Implications for corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13 (3): 386–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Vogel, S. K. 2006. Japan remodeled: How government and industry are reforming Japanese capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  145. Wan, W. P. 2005. Country resource environments, firm capabilities, and corporate diversification strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Wan, W. P., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2003. Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46 (1): 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Wever, K. S. 1995. Negotiating competitiveness: Employment relations and organizational innovation in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  148. Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  149. Whitley, R. 2005. How national are business systems? The role of states and complementary institutions in standardizing systems of economic coordination and control at the national level. In G. Morgan, R. Whitley and E. Moen (Eds), Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, institutional change, and systems of economic organization: 190–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  150. Whitley, R., Morgan, G., Kelly, W., & Sharpe, D. 2003. The changing Japanese multinational: Application, adaptation and learning in car manufacturing and financial services. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (3): 643–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  152. Witt, M. A., & Lewin, A. Y. 2007. Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Guest editors' introduction: Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Zeitlin, J. 2000. Introduction: Americanization and its limits: Reworking US technology and management in post-war Europe and Japan. In J. Zeitlin and G. Herrigel (Eds), Americanization and its limits: Reworking US technology and management in post-war Europe and Japan: 1–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  155. Zysman, J. 1983. Governments, markets, and growth: Financial systems and the politics of industrial change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  156. Zysman, J. 1994. How institutions create historically rooted trajectories of growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (1): 243–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementKing's College LondonUK
  2. 2.Political Science DepartmentTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations