Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 589–612 | Cite as

The effects of social capital and organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts

  • Chung-Leung Luk
  • Oliver H M Yau
  • Leo Y M Sin
  • Alan C B Tse
  • Raymond P M Chow
  • Jenny S Y Lee
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Part Special Issue: Institutions and International Business

Abstract

This paper examines how social capital and organizational innovativeness influence business performance through their separate, indirect, or interactive effects, and how these effects differ across the institutional contexts of a transition economy and a market economy. In line with institutional theory, our findings show that the effects of social capital are more extensive and probably more malignant in a transition economy than in a market economy. Furthermore, different types of organizational innovativeness, as corporate culture, can be cultivated by different forms of social capital in different institutional contexts. The implications for institutional theory and social capital theory, and the managerial implications, are discussed.

Keywords

institutional theory social capital theory organizational innovativeness guanxi mainland China Hong Kong 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the helpful comments of Kwaku Atuahene-Gima, Kevin Au, Chung-Ming Lau, Shige Makino, Roger Rensvold, Chenting Su, Joe Zhou, and Kevin Zhou on earlier drafts of this paper. We specially thank Professor Witold Henisz and the two anonymous JIBS reviewers whose insightful feedback greatly improved this paper. The Unit for Chinese Management Development, Department of Marketing, City University of Hong Kong provided funding for this research.

References

  1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27 (1): 17–40.Google Scholar
  2. Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3): 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3): 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 238–256.Google Scholar
  7. Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1988. The iron law of fiefs: Bureaucratic failure and the problem of governance in the Chinese economic reforms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33 (4): 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (4): 600–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education: 241–258. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  11. Buck, T., Filatotchev, I., Nolan, P., & Wright, M. 2000. Different paths to economic reform in Russia and China: Causes and consequences. Journal of World Business, 35 (4): 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakravarthy, B. S. 1986. Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7 (5): 437–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Child, J., & Tse, D. K. 2001. China's transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chow, C. Y. 2007. Judges jailed in Shenzhen corruption scandal. South China Morning Post, 2 March: A1.Google Scholar
  15. Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 92–117.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement): S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Damanpour, F., Szabat, K. A., & Evan, W. M. 1989. The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 26 (6): 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies, H., Leung, T. K. P., Luk, S. T. K., & Wong, Y. H. 1995. The benefits of ‘guanxi’: The value of relationships in developing the Chinese market. Industrial Marketing Management, 24 (3): 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. deLisle, J. 2004. Property rights reform in China. http://www.fpri.org/transcripts/lecture.20040126.delisle.chinapropertyrights.html. Accessed 4 March 2007.
  21. Deshpande, R., & Webster Jr, F. E. 1989. Organizational culture and marketing: Defining the research agenda. Journal of Marketing, 53 (1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deshpande, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster Jr, F. E. 1993. Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57 (1): 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dun & Bradstreet Information Services 1999. D&B major corporations in P.R. China (Vol. 2, Chinese Companies). Hong Kong: Dun & Bradstreet (HK) Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Field, J. 2003. Social capital. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. 1990/1979. Free to choose: A personal statement. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
  27. Gabbay, S. M. 1997. Social capital in creation of financial capital. Champaign, IL: Stipes.Google Scholar
  28. Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (4): 654–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenley, G. E., & Foxall, G. R. 1997. Multiple stakeholder orientation in UK companies and the implications for company performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34 (2): 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenley, G. E., & Foxall, G. R. 1998. External moderation of associations among stakeholder orientations and company performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15 (1): 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. 2001. A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. 2001. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage: 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. 1998. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62 (4): 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heritage Foundation 2007. Index of Economic Freedom. http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/index.cfm. Accessed 4 March 2007.
  35. Hitt, M. A., Lee, H. U., & Yucel, E. 2002. The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among Asian and Western firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19 (2–3): 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. 2004. The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organization Science, 15 (2): 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hooley, G., Broderick, A. J., & Möller, K. 1998. Competitive positioning and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6 (2): 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hui, C. H., & Luk, C. L. 1997. Industrial/organizational psychology. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, (2nd ed.), Vol. 3 371–411. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  40. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. 1998. Innovation, market orientation and organizational learning: An integration and empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62 (3): 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. 1996. LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kornai, J. 1992. The socialist system: The political economy of communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee, T. Y. 2005. Development of management philosophy for Chinese business environment. Management Decision, 43 (4): 542–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2001. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6): 1123–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li, Z., & Chen, C. 2006. Developing global competitiveness: The case of Haier Group. In K. H. Zhang (Ed.), China as the world factory: 53–68. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Lin, J. Y., Cai, F., & Li, Z. 1998. Competition, policy burdens, and state-owned enterprise reform. American Economic Review, 88 (2): 422–427.Google Scholar
  47. Lu, Q. 2000. China's leap into the information age: Innovation and organization in the computer industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luk, C. L., Yau, O. H. M., Tse, A. C. B., Sin, L. Y. M., & Chow, R. 2005. Stakeholder orientation and business performance: The case of service companies in China. Journal of International Marketing, 13 (1): 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luo, Y. 2002. Corruption and organization in Asian management systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19 (2–3): 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marks, G. W. 1985. State-economy linkages in advanced industrialized societies. In N. J. Vig & S. E. Schier (Eds), Political economy in Western democracies: 46–69. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Marsh, S. J., & Stock, G. N. 2006. Creating dynamic capability: The role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23 (5): 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (12): 1133–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mytelka, L. K. 1999. Competition, innovation and competitiveness in developing countries. Paris: OECD Development Centre.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 23 (2): 242–266.Google Scholar
  55. Naughton, B. 1996. Growing out of the plan: Chinese economic reform, 1978–1993. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Nee, V. 1992. Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. O'Connor, N. G., Deng, J., & Luo, Y. 2006. Political constraints, organization design and performance measurement in China's state-owned enterprises. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31 (2): 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paine, L. S. 2001a. The Haier Group (A). Harvard Business School: Case 9-398-101.Google Scholar
  60. Paine, L. S. 2001b. The Haier Group (B). Harvard Business School: Case 9-398-102.Google Scholar
  61. Paine, L. S. 2001c. The Haier Group (C). Harvard Business School: Case 9-398-162.Google Scholar
  62. Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (5): 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parkhe, A. 1991. Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (4): 579–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peng, M. W. 2002. Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19 (2–3): 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 275–296.Google Scholar
  66. Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro–macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 486–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  68. Phillips, L. W. 1981. Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: A methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (4): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4): 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. 2007. Can Russia's state-managed, network capitalism be competitive? Institutional pull versus institutional push. Journal of World Business, 42 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sandefur, R. L., & Laumann, E. O. 1998. A paradigm for social capital. Rationality and Society, 10 (4): 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schlevogt, K. A. 2002. The art of Chinese management: Theory, evidence, and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Scott, W. R. 2001. Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  75. Sull, D. N., & Wong, Y. 2005. Made in China: What Western managers can learn from trailblazing Chinese entrepreneurs. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  76. Sun, Y. 2004. Corruption and market in contemporary China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Tarr, G. 2003. Haier, Legend, TCL top China OEM list. Twice, 12 August: 36.Google Scholar
  78. Thorelli, H. B. 1986. Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7 (1): 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thun, E. 2006. Changing lanes in China: Foreign direct investment, local governments, and auto sector development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Transparency International 2001. Global corruption report. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  81. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4): 464–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Uhlenbruck, K. 2004. Developing acquired foreign subsidiaries: The experience of MNEs in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (1): 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Very, P., Lubatkin, M., Calori, R., & Veiga, J. 1997. Relative standing and the performance of recently acquired European firms. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (8): 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vig, N. J. 1985. Introduction: Political science and political economy. In N. J. Vig & S. E. Schier (Eds), Political economy in Western democracies: 3–16. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.Google Scholar
  85. Walder, A. G. 1995. Local governments as industrial firms: An organizational analysis of China's transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 101 (2): 263–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Warner, M. 1995. The management of human resources of Chinese industry. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. 1996. Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (6): 680–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Whitley, R., Henderson, J., Czaban, L., & Lengyel, G. 1996. Trust and contractual relations in an emerging capitalist economy: The changing trading relationships of ten large Hungarian enterprises. Organization Studies, 17 (3): 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wikipedia 2007. Hong Kong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong. Accessed 28 February 2007.
  90. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. 2003. Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (13): 1307–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6): 1641–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yan, J. J., & Hu, Y. 2002. Haier. Taiwan: China Times Publishing Company (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  93. Zeng, M., & Williamson, P. J. 2003. The hidden dragons. Harvard Business Review, 81 (10): 92–100.Google Scholar
  94. Zhang, K. H. 2006. China's foreign trade and export boom: 1978–2004. In K. H. Zhang (Ed.), China as the world factory: 9–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chung-Leung Luk
    • 1
  • Oliver H M Yau
    • 1
  • Leo Y M Sin
    • 2
  • Alan C B Tse
    • 2
  • Raymond P M Chow
    • 3
  • Jenny S Y Lee
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of MarketingCity University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.Department of MarketingChinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  3. 3.School of Business & Administration, The Open University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  4. 4.Department of ManagementCity University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations