Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 304–325 | Cite as

The role of past performance in export ventures: a short-term reactive approach

  • Luis Filipe LagesEmail author
  • Sandy D Jap
  • David A Griffith
Article

Abstract

This paper employs organizational learning theory to examine the short-term effect of past export performance, and internal (management) and external (market) forces on marketing strategy adaptation and current export performance. Results from a survey of over 500 export managers indicate that current-period performance improvement (in terms of performance achievement, export intensity, and performance satisfaction in the current year) is influenced by the firm's commitment to exporting. Further, the authors found that while performance satisfaction feeds performance improvement in the following year, both the previous year's export intensity and export performance achievement produce a negative impact on current-period performance improvement. More importantly, the level of development in the export market facilitates marketing strategy adaptation in the short term, as does export intensity in the previous year. However, satisfaction with previous-year performance negatively influences the degree of distribution adaptation. Implications for international business researchers and practitioners are also discussed.

Keywords

past performance short term export performance export marketing organizational learning adaptation-standardization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the following research grants to the first author: by FCT-EU (2000–2001) while a Visiting Scholar at MIT Sloan School of Management and Stanford University Graduate School of Business; by NOVA EGIDE (2001–2007) and 6th European Framework Program (2004–2006) while affiliated with Universidade Nova de Lisboa; and by FCT-EU (2006) while a Visiting Scholar at London Business School. The authors acknowledge Tim Ambler, Pedro Pita Barros, James Harris, Jose Mata, David Montgomery, Aviv Shoham, Jose Tavares, JIBS' editors, and three anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aaby, N. -E., & Slater, S. F. 1989. Management influences on export performance: A review of the empirical literature 1978–1988. International Marketing Review, 6 (4): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atuahene-Gima, K. 2005. Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69 (4): 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, J. 1990. Managing in developing countries. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R. P. 1980. Causal models in marketing. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Beamish, P. W., Craig, R., & McLellan, L. 1993. The performance characteristics of Canadian vs UK exporters in small and medium sized firms. Management International Review, 33 (2): 121–137.Google Scholar
  7. Bilkey, W. J. 1978. An attempted integration of the literature on the export behavior of firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 9 (1): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonoma, T. V., & Clark, B. H. 1988. Marketing performance assessment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buzzell, R. 1968. Can you standardize multinational marketing? Harvard Business Review, 46 (Nov/Dec): 102–113.Google Scholar
  10. Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. 1994. Marketing strategy–performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavusgil, S. T., Zou, S., & Naidu, G. M. 1993. Product and promotion adaptation in export ventures: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (3): 479–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. 1985. The impact of export strategy on export sales performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 16 (1): 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16 (3): 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. 1999. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24 (3): 522–537.Google Scholar
  15. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Das, M. 1994. Successful and unsuccessful exporters from developing countries: Some preliminary findings. European Journal of Marketing, 28 (12): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Day, G. S. 1994. Continuous learning about markets. California Management Review, 36 (4): 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Day, G. S., & Nedungadi, P. 1994. Managerial representations of competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 58 (2): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diamantopoulos, A., & Inglis, K. 1988. Identifying differences between high- and low-involvement exporters. International Marketing Review, 5 (2): 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. 2001. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2): 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dickson, P. R. 1992. Toward a general theory of competitive rationality. Journal of Marketing, 56 (1): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. 1989. Evolution of global marketings: Scale, scope and synergy. Columbia Journal of World Business, 24 (3): 47–58.Google Scholar
  23. Doyle, P., Saunders, J., & Wong, V. 1986. Japanese marketing strategies in the UK: A comparative study. Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (1): 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doyle, P., Saunders, J., & Wong, V. 1992. Competition in global markets: A case study of American and Japanese competition in the British market. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (3): 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duncan, R. B. 1974. Modifications in decision structure in adapting to the environment: Some implications for organizational learning. Decision Sciences, 5 (4): 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. European Commission 2000. External trade. http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/index_en.htm. (DGI).
  27. Ferrier, W. J. 2001. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4): 858–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Financial Times 2002. Spending cuts tighten to avoid EU sanctions on deficit, In World Report; Portugal, 21 October: i–iv.Google Scholar
  29. Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. 1985. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10 (4): 803–813.Google Scholar
  30. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greve, H. R. 1998. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (1): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5): 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Helfat, C. E. 1994. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Science, 40 (12): 1720–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Nichols, E. L. 2002. An examination of cultural competitiveness and order fulfillment cycle time with supply chains. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (3): 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57 (3): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. 1993. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  37. Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, L. C., & Morgan, N. A. 2000. Firm-level export performance assessment: Review, evaluation, and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (4): 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Katsikeas, C. S., Piercy, N. F., & Ioannidis, C. 1996. Determinants of export performance in a European context. European Journal of Marketing, 30 (6): 6–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Katsikeas, C. S., Samiee, S., & Theodosiou, M. 2006. Strategy fit and performance consequences of international marketing standardization. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (9): 867–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaynak, E., & Kuan, W. K. -Y. 1993. Environment, strategy, structure, and performance in the context of export activity: An empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Research, 27 (1): 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koh, A. C. 1991. Relationship among organizational characteristics, marketing strategy and export performance. International Marketing Review, 8 (3): 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lages, L. F. 2000. A conceptual framework of the determinants of export performance: Reorganizing key variables and shifting contingencies in export marketing. Journal of Global Marketing, 13 (3): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lages, L. F., & Jap, S. 2003. The relationship among past performance, marketing mix adaptation, and current export performance improvement in global marketing relationships. In J. W. C. Arts, S. Banerjee and J. L. G. Binken (Eds), Global marketing, Marketing Science Institute Report No. 03-116: 97–98. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Lages, L. F., & Lages, C. R. 2004. The STEP scale: A measure of short-term export performance improvement. Journal of International Marketing, 12 (1): 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lages, L. F., & Montgomery, D. B. 2001. Export assistance, price adaptation to the foreign market, and annual export performance improvement: A structural model examination, Research Paper #1700, Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  46. Lages, L. F., & Montgomery, D. B. 2004. Export performance as an antecedent of export commitment and marketing strategy adaptation: Evidence from small and medium sized exporters. European Journal of Marketing, 38 (9/10): 1186–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lages, L. F., & Montgomery, D. B. 2005. The relationship between export assistance and performance improvement in Portuguese export ventures: An empirical testing of the mediating role of pricing strategy adaptation. European Journal of Marketing, 39 (7/8): 755–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lages, C., Lages, C. R., & Lages, L. F. 2005a. The RELQUAL scale: A measure of relationship quality in export market ventures. Journal of Business Research, 58 (5): 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lages, L. F., Lages, C., & Lages, C. R. 2005b. Bringing export performance metrics into annual reports: The APEV scale and the PERFEX scorecard. Journal of International Marketing, 13 (3): 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lant, T. K. 1992. Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Science, 38 (5): 623–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lant, T. K., & Hurley, A. E. 1999. A contingency model of response to performance feedback: Escalation of commitment and incremental adaptation in resource investment decisions. Group and Organization Management, 24 (4): 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lant, T. K., & Mezias, S. J. 1992. An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organization Science, 3 (1): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lant, T. K., & Montgomery, D. B. 1987. Learning from strategic success and failure. Journal of Business Research, 15 (6): 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., & Batra, B. 1992. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (8): 585–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee, C., & Griffith, D. A. 2004. The marketing strategy–performance relationship in an export-driven developing economy: A Korean illustration. International Marketing Review, 21 (3): 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Samiee, S. 2002. Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 55 (1): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Levinthal, D., & March, J. C. 1981. A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2 (4): 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Levinthal, D., & March, J. C. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Levitt, B., & March, J.C 1988. Organizational learning. In B. Bacharach (Ed.), Annual review of psychology, Vol. 14: 319–340. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
  60. Lord, M. D., & Ranft, A. L. 2000. Organizational learning about new international markets: Exploring the internal transfer of local market knowledge. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (4): 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Luo, Y., & Peng, M. W. 1999. Learning to compete in a transition economy: Experience, environment, and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (2): 269–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Rich, G. A. 2001. Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (2): 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Madsen, T. K. 1989. Successful export marketing management: Some empirical evidence. International Marketing Review, 6 (4): 41–57.Google Scholar
  64. Madsen, T. K. 1998. Executive insights: Managerial judgment of export performance. Journal of International Marketing, 6 (3): 82–93.Google Scholar
  65. March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2 (1): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  67. Morgan, N. A., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C. S. 2004. Antecedents of export venture performance: A theoretical model and empirical assessment. Journal of Marketing, 68 (1): 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Özsomer, A., & Gençtürk, E. 2003. A resource-based model of market learning in the subsidiary: The capabilities of exploration and exploitation. Journal of International Marketing, 11 (3): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  71. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4): 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Prietula, M. J., & Watson, H. S. 2000. Extending the Cyert–March duopoly model: Organizational and economic insights. Organization Science, 11 (5): 565–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ryans Jr., J. K., Griffith, D. A., & White, D. S. 2003. Standardization/adaptation of international marketing strategy: Necessary conditions for the advancement of knowledge. International Marketing Review, 20 (6): 588–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Samiee, S., & Roth, K. 1992. The influence of global marketing standardization on performance. Journal of Marketing, 56 (2): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Seifert, B., & Ford, J. 1989. Are exporting firms modifying their products, pricing and promotion policies? International Marketing Review, 6 (6): 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Senge, P. M. 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  77. Senge, P. M. 1992. Mental models. Planning Review, 20 (2): 4–10, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shoham, A. 1996. Marketing-mix standardization: Determinants of export performance. Journal of Global Marketing, 10 (2): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shoham, A. 1998. Export performance: A conceptualization and empirical assessment. Journal of International Marketing, 6 (3): 59–81.Google Scholar
  80. Shoham, A. 1999. Bounded rationality, planning, standardization of international strategy, and export performance: A structural model examination. Journal of International Marketing, 7 (2): 24–50.Google Scholar
  81. Sinkula, J. 1994. Market information processing and organizational learning. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sinkula, J., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. 1997. A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (4): 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Skarmeas, D., Katsikeas, C. S., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. 2002. Drivers of commitment and its impact on performance in cross-cultural buyer–seller relationships: The importer's perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (4): 757–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sousa, C. M. S., & Bradley, F. 2006. Cultural distance and psychic distance: Two peas in a pod? Journal of International Marketing, 14 (1): 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sriram, V., & Manu, F. A. 1995. Country-of-destination and export marketing strategy: A study of US exporters. Journal of Global Marketing, 8 (3/4): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stata, R. 1992. Management innovation. Executive Excellence, 9 (6): 8–9.Google Scholar
  87. Sullivan, J. J., & Nonaka, I. 1986. The application of organizational learning theory to Japanese and American management. Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (3): 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Theodosiou, M., & Leonidou, L. C. 2003. Standardization vs adaptation of international marketing strategy: An integrative assessment of the empirical research. International Business Review, 12 (2): 141–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tookey, D. A. 1964. Factors associated with success in exporting. Journal of Management Studies, 1 (1): 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tsang, E. W. K. 1997. Organizational learning the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 50 (1): 73–89.Google Scholar
  91. Ulrich, D., Von Glinow, M. A., & Jick, T. 1993. High impact learning: Building and diffusing learning capability. Organizational Dynamics, 22 (2): 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wiener, Y., & Vardi, Y. 1980. Relationships between job, organization, and career commitments and work outcomes: An integrative approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26 (1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wong, V., Saunders, J., & Doyle, P. 1987. Japanese marketing strategies in the United Kingdom. Long Range Planning, 20 (6): 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zou, S., & Stan, S. 1998. The determinants of export performance: A review of the empirical literature between 1987 and 1997. International Marketing Review, 15 (5): 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zou, S., Andrus, D. M., & Norvell, D. W. 1997. Standardization of international marketing strategy by firms from a developing country. International Marketing Review, 14 (2): 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Filipe Lages
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sandy D Jap
    • 3
  • David A Griffith
    • 4
  1. 1.Deshpande Center for Technological Innovation, MIT School of EngineeringUSA
  2. 2.Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Nova de LisboaPortugal
  3. 3.Goizueta Business School, Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Eli Broad Graduate School of Business, Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations