Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Strategic Mergers of Strong Institutions to Enhance Competitive Advantage

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strategic mergers are formal combinations or amalgamations of higher education institutions with the aim of enhancing competitive advantage, or merging for ‘mutual growth’. Recently, in a number of countries, there has been a decided shift from mergers initiated by governments, and dealing mainly with ‘problem’ cases, towards institutional-initiated mergers involving strong institutions, and with clear strategic objectives. These issues are addressed and a case study is presented of the 2004 merger that created the new University of Manchester, which aims to be among the top 25 universities internationally by 2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is a revised version of a paper presented at the 19th CHER Conference, Kassel, 7–9 September 2006.

References

  • Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee. (2004) Australian Higher Education Institutions, Canberra.

  • Brown, N., Denholm, J. and Clark, T. (2003a) Handling Merger Proposals, Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., Denholm, J. and Clark, T. (2003b) Case Study 4: The University of Manchester and the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, A.R. and Bowditch, J.L. (1989) The Human Side of Mergers and Acquisitions — Managing Collisions Between People, Cultures and Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B. (1994) ‘Presidential Leadership and the Growth Concept’, in J. Martin, J. E. Samels and Associates (eds.) Merging Colleges for Mutual Growth: A New Strategy for Academic Mergers, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, H. (2002) ‘Manchester universities announce plans to merge’, Education Guardian, 4 March.

  • Chen, D.Y. (2002) ‘The amalgamation of Chinese higher education institutions’, Education Policy Analysis 10 (20): 1–12 (Retrieved 26 September 2006 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epas/v10n20.html ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. and Soo, M. (2005) ‘Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: a cross-national analysis of university ranking systems’, Higher Education 49 (4): 495–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J. and Lang, D. (2001) Mergers in Higher Education: Lessons from Theory and Experience, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fielden, J. and Markham, L. (1997) ‘Lessons learned from mergers in higher education, CHEMS Paper 17, London.

  • Goedegebuure, L.C.J. (1992) Mergers in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective, Enschede: Universitiet Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2001) ‘Universities plan merger to improve resources’, 17 May.

  • Hall, M., Symes, A. and Luescher, T. (2004) The governance of merger in South African Higher Education, Research Report prepared for the Council of Higher Education, Council on Higher Education, Pretoria.

  • Harman, G. and Harman, K. (2002) ‘Institutional mergers in higher education: lessons from international experience’, Tertiary Education and Management 29: 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. and Meek, V.L. (eds.) (1988) Institutional Amalgamations in Higher Education: Process and Outcome in Five Countries, Armidale: Department of Administrative and Higher Education Studies, University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. and Robertson Cuninghame, R. (eds.) (1995) The Network UNE Experience: Reflections on the Amalgamated University of New England 1989–1993, Armidale: Department of Administrative, Higher and Adult Education Studies, University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, K.M. (2002) ‘Merging divergent campus cultures into coherent educational communities: challenges for higher education leaders’, Higher Education 44 (1): 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hata, T. (2004) ‘Mergers and Cooperation of Higher Education Institutions in Japan’, in COE International Seminar on Mergers and Cooperation among Higher Education Institutions: Japan and Europe, Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council of England. (2002) Resources for Academic Year, Coldhaven: HECFE.

  • Jansen, J.D. (ed.) (2002) Mergers in Higher Education: Lessons Learned in Transitional Contexts, Pretoria: Unisa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karier, T. (1993) Beyond Competition: The Economics of Mergers and Monopoly Power, Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohm, A. and La Piana, D. (2003) Strategic Restructuring of Non-Profit Organizations; Mergers, Integrations, and Alliances, Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. (2002) ‘The merger of non-university colleges in Norway’, Higher Education 44 (1): 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. (2002a) ‘There are mergers, and there are mergers: the forms of inter-institutional combination’, Higher Education Management and Policy 14 (1): 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. (2002b) ‘A lexicon of inter-institutional cooperation’, Higher Education 44 (1): 153–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Piana, D. (2003) ‘Comment on William M. Rohe and Rachel G. Bratt's “Failures, Downsizing and Mergers among Community Development Corporations”: merger does not mean failure’, Housing Policy Debate 14 (1 and 2): 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, W. (2007) ‘Higher education mergers: integrating organisational cultures and developing appropriate management styles’, Higher Education Quarterly 61 (1): 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006) ‘Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education’, Higher Education 52: 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. and Samels, J.E. (2002) ‘We were wrong: try partnerships, not mergers’, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 17 May, p. 10.

  • Martin, J., Samels, J.E. and Associates (1994) Merging Colleges for Mutual Growth: A New Strategy for Academic Mergers, Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merger News. (2004) Cardiff: Cardiff University and the University of Wales College of Medicine.

  • Ramsden, B. (2006) Patterns of Higher Education Institutions in the UK, London: Universities UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukin, J. (2002) ‘More mergers, more closures’, Educationnet News, 29 November.

  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Institute of Higher Education. (2006) Academic Ranking of World Universities 2006, Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Institute of Higher Education, http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2006/ARWU2006TOP500list.htm.

  • Skodvin, O. (1999) Mergers in Higher Education: Success of Failure, Olso: Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Edinburgh Planning Section. (2004) Mergers within the Higher Education Sector, Edinburgh.

  • The University of Manchester. (2004a) ‘Towards Manchester 2015: the strategic plan of The University of Manchester’, Manchester.

  • The University of Manchester. (2004b) ‘Towards Manchester 2015: the planning and accountability cycle’, A Companion Document, Manchester.

  • The University of Manchester. (2006) ‘Stock take report 2006: a review of progress against the Manchester 2015 strategic plan’, Manchester.

  • Weston, J.F. and Weaver, S.C. (2004) Mergers and Acquisitions, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harman, G., Harman, K. Strategic Mergers of Strong Institutions to Enhance Competitive Advantage. High Educ Policy 21, 99–121 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300172

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300172

Keywords

Navigation