Skip to main content
Log in

is the wolf at the door this time? transatlantic relations after Iraq

  • Research
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Realists and liberals dispute the post-war record of the transatlantic alliance. Yet, the crisis over Iraq has prompted consensus on the notion that transatlantic relations will ‘never be the same’. This article offers two central arguments. First, the US-European alliance was transformed, long before the Iraq crisis, by the end of the Cold War. Second, convergence on ends for the international order remain obscured by transatlantic disputes over means.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I am grateful to Helmut Sonnenfeldt for suggesting this point to me during a meeting in Washington in December 2003.

  2. The recommendations summarised here are taken from a study for the European Commission that I led in 2005 (available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/us/revamping/index.htm).

  3. Remarks by Senator Joseph Lieberman, 39th Munich Conference on Security Policy, ‘NATO's future role’, 8 February 2003 (available at: http://www.securityconference.de/konferenzen/reden.php?menu_2003=&menu_konferenzen=&sprache=en&jahr=2003&; accessed 10 August 2004).

References

  • Asmus, R.D. (2003) ‘Rebuilding the Atlantic Alliance’, Foreign Affairs 82 (5): 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, Z., Gates, R.M. and Maloney, S. (2004) Iran: Time for a New Approach, New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 19 July, available at http://www.cfr.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chace, J. and Ravenal, E.C. (eds.) (1976) Atlantis Lost: US-European Relations After the Cold War, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.K. (2001) Waging Modern War, New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2004) ‘Transatlantic draft’, FT Magazine, 31 July, pp. 30–31.

  • Council on Foreign Relations (2004) Renewing the Atlantic Partnership, New York: Report of an Independent Task Force sponsored by the CFR, available at http://www.cfr.org.

  • Cox, M. (2005) ‘Beyond the west: terrors in transatlantia’, European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 203–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deporte, A.W. (1986) Europe Between the Superpowers, 2nd edition, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, D. (2004) Europe Recast, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhower, D.D. (1965) Waging Peace: the White House Years 1956–61, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) ‘A Wider Europe’, Brussels, COM 03 (104), 11 March.

  • European Union (2003) A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy, Brussels, December, available at http://ue.eu.int/cms3_fo/showPage.ASP?id=266&lang=EN&mode=g.

  • Everts, S. (2004) ‘Why Gulf states need their own security forum’, Financial Times, 9 February 2004, available at http://www.cer.org.uk.

  • Freedman, L. (1982) ‘The Atlantic crisis’, International Affairs 58 (3): 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German Marshall Fund (2004) ‘Democracy and human development in the broader Middle East: a Transatlantic strategy for partnership, Istanbul Paper No. 1; 25–27 June; Washington. Available at http://www.gmfus.org.

  • Gomez, R. (2003) Negotiating the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: Strategic Action in EU Foreign Policy?, Aldershot and Burlington VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P. (2001–2) ‘NATO after 11 September’, Survival 43 (4): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P.H. and Shapiro, J. (2004) Allies at War: America, Europe and the Crisis Over Iraq, New York and London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries, O. (2004) ‘Why power is America's weakness’, Financial Times, 27 July, p. 7.

  • Ikenberry, G.J. (2000) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, J. (1984) ‘Europe's American pacifier’, Foreign Policy 54 (1): 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (2004a) ‘Introduction’, International Affairs 80 (4): 587–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (ed.) (2004b) ‘The transatlantic relationship’, International Affairs, (special issue) 80 (4): 587–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. (2002) ‘Power and weakness’, Policy Review, available at http://www.policyreview.org.

  • Kagan, R. (2003) Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. (2004) ‘America's crisis of legitimacy’, Foreign Affairs 83 (2): 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W. (2003) ‘Trigger-happy protestant materialists? The European Christian Democrats and the United States’, in M. Trachtenberg (ed.) Between Empire and Alliance: America and Europe during the Cold War, Boulder and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. (1994) Diplomacy, New York and London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. (2001) Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Towards Diplomacy for the 21st Century, New York and London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, C.A. (2003) The End of the American Era: US Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, K. (1991) Suez, London and New York: Macmillan and St Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2005) Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century, London and New York: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundestad, G. (1997) ‘Empire’ by Integration: the United States and European Integration, 1945–97, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, W.R. (2004) Power, Terror, Peace and War, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A. (2004) The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America, New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, P. (2003) The Accidental Constitution: The Story of the European Convention, Brussels: EuroComment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaway, M. and Carothers, T. (2004) The Greater Middle East Initiative: Off to a False Start, Washington DC: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace available at http://www.carnegieendowment.org, accessed 29 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (2003) ‘The US and Europe in the Balkans’, in J. Peterson and M.A. Pollack (eds.) Europe, America, Bush, London and New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (2004a) ‘America as a European power: the end of “Empire by Integration”?’ International Affairs 88 (4): 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (2004b) ‘Europe, America, Iraq: worst ever and ever-worsening?’ The European Union: Annual Review 2004/5 42 (6): 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (2005) ‘In defence of inelegance: IR theory and transatlantic practice’, International Relations 19 (4), (forthcoming).

  • Peterson, J. and Pollack, M. (eds.) (2003) Europe, America, Bush, London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, A.J. (ed.) (1986) A Widening Atlantic? Domestic Change and Foreign Policy, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M.A. and Shaffer, G.C. (eds.) (2001) Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy, Boulder CO and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, T.R. (2004) The United States of Europe: the New Superpower and the End of American Supremacy, New York: the Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaetzel, J.R. (1975) The Unhinged Alliance, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfaty, S. (2005) The Vital Partnership: Power and Order, Boulder and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjursen, H. (2004) ‘On the identity of NATO’, International Affairs 80 (4): 687–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.E. (2003) European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World, Oxford and New York: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaak, P.-H. (1971) The Continuing Battle: Memoirs of a European 1936–66, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg, M. (ed.) (2003) Between Empire and Alliance: America and Europe during the Cold War, Boulder and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. (2001) ‘Europe, the necessary partner’, Foreign Affairs 80 (3): 16–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winand, P. (1993) Eisenhower, Kennedy and the United States of Europe, New York: St Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R. (2004) Europe's Uncertain Pursuit of Middle East Reform, Washington DC: Canegie Endowment for International Peace Middle East Series 45, June, available at http://www.carnegieendowment.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, H. (2003) ‘Western Europe and the American challenge: conflict and cooperation in technology policy and monetary policy, 1965–1973’, in M. Trachtenberg (ed.) Between Empire and Alliance: America and Europe During the Cold War, Boulder and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 127–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, J. is the wolf at the door this time? transatlantic relations after Iraq. Eur Polit Sci 5, 52–61 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210065

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210065

Keywords

Navigation