Skip to main content
Log in

transatlantic economic relations: continuity amid discord

  • Research
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Union (EU) and the United States are the world's largest and most-interconnected economies. In the 1990s, they engaged in a series of joint initiatives designed further to liberalise the transatlantic marketplace through cooperation in trade and regulatory matters, including pursuant to the 1995 New Transatlantic Agenda. From 2000 to 2004, however, political tensions between the US and Europe intensified, as conflicts arose over the war in Iraq, the International Criminal Court, and the Kyoto Protocol, triggering fears that political turmoil could disrupt the mutually beneficial transatlantic economic relationship. Despite the political challenges, the transatlantic economic relationship has demonstrated extraordinary continuity and resilience amid the discord. The US/EU economic relationship has been subject to intensive disputes in areas such as steel, airplanes, and genetically modified foods, but there is little sign that the election of George W. Bush or the 2003 invasion of Iraq was responsible for these tensions, which arose primarily from pre-existing divergent domestic political pressures. This relative insulation of the economic relationship from the dispute over the Iraq war, however, does not imply that power politics is unimportant in the economic realm, and indeed we argue that outcomes in the economic realm are shaped significantly by differences in US and EU market and institutional power in different sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, D., Pollack, M.A., Shaffer, G.C. and Wallace, H. (eds.) (2005) The New Transatlantic Agenda and the Future of Transatlantic Economic Governance, Florence: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermann, G., Herdegen, M. and Lindstreth, P. (eds.) (2001) Transatlantic Regulatory Co-Operation: Legal Problems and Political Prospects, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D.S. and Quinlan, J.P. (2005) ‘Partners in Prosperity: The Changing Geography of the Transatlantic Economy’, in D. Andrews, M.A. Pollack, G.C. Shaffer and H. Wallace (eds.) The New Transatlantic Agenda and the Future of Transatlantic Economic Governance, Florence: European University Institute, pp. 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacic, W.E. (2005) ‘Competition Policy Cooperation and the Pursuit of Better Practices’, in D. Andrews, M.A. Pollack, G.C. Shaffer and H. Wallace (eds.) The New Transatlantic Agenda and the Future of Transatlantic Economic Governance, Florence: European University Institute, pp. 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaidis, K. and Steffenson, R. (2005) ‘Managed Mutual Recognition and the Transatlantic Marketplace’, in D. Andrews, M.A. Pollack, G.C. Shaffer and H. Wallace (eds.) The New Transatlantic Agenda and the Future of Transatlantic Economic Governance, Florence: European University Institute, pp. 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. and Pollack, M.A. (eds.) (2003) Europe, America, Bush: Transatlantic Relations in the 21st Century, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Philippart, E. and Winand, P. (2001) ‘Deeds Not Words? Evaluating and Explaining the US–EU Policy Output’, in E. Philippart and P. Winand (eds.) Ever Closer Partnership: Policymaking in US–EU Relations, Brussels: Peter Lang, pp. 431–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M.A. and Shaffer, G.C. (eds.) (2001) Transatlantic Relations in the Global Economy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, E. (2005) ‘Market Power without a Single Market: The New Transatlantic Relations in Financial Services’, in D. Andrews, M.A. Pollack, G.C. Shaffer and H. Wallace (eds.) The New Transatlantic Agenda and the Future of Transatlantic Economic Governance, Florence: European University Institute, pp. 233–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Asinari, M.V. and Poullet, Y. (2005) ‘Privacy, Personal Data Protection and the Safe Harbour Decision: From Euphoria to Policy, from Policy to Regulation?’, in D. Andrews, M.A. Pollack, G.C. Shaffer and H. Wallace (eds.) The New Transatlantic Agenda and the Future of Transatlantic Economic Governance, Florence: European University Institute, pp. 101–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, G.C. and Pollack, M.A. (2005) ‘Reconciling (or Failing to Reconcile) Regulatory Differences: The Ongoing Transatlantic Dispute over the Regulation of Biotechnology’, in D. Andrews, M.A. Pollack, G.C. Shaffer and H. Wallace (eds.) The New Transatlantic Agenda and the Future of Transatlantic Economic Governance, Florence: European University Institute, pp. 167–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, B. (2005) ‘Trade Negotiations’, in D. Andrews, M.A. Pollack, G.C. Shaffer and H. Wallace (eds.) The New Transatlantic Agenda and the Future of Transatlantic Economic Governance, Florence: European University Institute, pp. 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pollack, M., Shaffer, G. transatlantic economic relations: continuity amid discord. Eur Polit Sci 5, 62–68 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210061

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210061

Keywords

Navigation