Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The conundrum of IT management

  • Opinion Piece
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

This paper presents a robust argument as to why it can be difficult for chief information officers (CIOs) to generate business value from investments that their organizations make in information technology (IT) with contemporary organizational structures, authority patterns, processes and mindsets. This argument is built on the subtle premise that organizations should not seek to merely manage IT but to manage the delivery of business value through IT. It takes the view that this latter quest is knowledge-based and that the knowledge resources to successfully deliver this value are distributed throughout the organization. Crucially, this knowledge is not located solely within the IT function, presenting a challenge for the CIO for its integration and coordination. With the CIO having little or no jurisdiction over all required knowledge, its deployment will therefore be fragmented. The conundrum of IT management is how to generate value through IT without having access and authority over necessary resources. Research and practitioner implications of this analysis are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

References

  • Adler P and Kwon S-W (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27, 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit R and Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate LM and Elam JJ (1992) New information systems leaders: a changing role in a changing world. MIS Quarterly 16(4), 469–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1989) Asset stocks and sustained competitive advantage: a comment. Management Science 35, 1511–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackler F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretations. Organization Studies 16(6), 1021–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS and Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science 12(2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr N (2003) IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review 81(5), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan YE (2002) Why haven’t we mastered alignment? The importance of informal organization structure. MIS Quarterly Executive 1(2), 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra C (1994) The grass roots of IT and strategy. In Strategic Information Systems: A European Perspective (CIBORRA C and JELESSI T, Eds), pp 3–24, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D and Prusak L (2001) In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis DJ (1996) Organizational capability as a source of profit. In Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage (MOINGEON B and EDMONSTON A, Eds), Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook SD and Brown JS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science 10, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1994) Saving IT's soul: human-centered information management. Harvard Business Review 72(2), 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH and Prusak L (1997) Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj S and Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Management Science 49(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl MJ (1996) The chief information officer: past, present, future. In Information Management: The Organizational Dimension (EARL MJ, Ed), pp 456–484, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl MJ and Feeny D (1994) Is your CIO adding value. Sloan Management Review 35(3), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny D, Edwards B and Simpson K (1992) Understanding the CEO/CIO relationship. MIS Quarterly 16(4), 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson G, Mathur S and Shah B (2005) Evolving from information to insight. MIT Sloan Management Review 46(2), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7, 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover V, Jeong SR, Kettinger WJ and Lee CC (1993) The chief information officer: a study of managerial roles. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(2), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G and Prahalad C K (1994) Competing For the Future. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (1990) Re-engineering work: don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review 68(4), 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen AC and Beamish PW (1997) PW knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review 22, 117–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives B and Learmonth GP (1984) The information systems as a competitive weapon. Communications of the ACM 27(12), 1193–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketttinger WJ, Grover V, Guha S and Segars AH (1994) Strategic information systems revisited: a study in sustainability and performance. MIS Quarterly 18(1), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C and Pervan G (2003) The practice of IS/IT benefits management in large Australian organizations. Information & Management 41(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus L (2004) Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change. Journal of Information Technology 19(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan FW (1984) Information technology changes the way you compete. Harvard Business Review 62(3), 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan FW, McKenny JL and Pyburn P (1983) The information archipelago – plotting a course. Harvard Business Review 61(1), 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney JL and McFarlan FW (1982) The information archipelago – maps and bridges. Harvard Business Review 60(5), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin D and Peppard J (2006) IT backsourcing: from ‘make or buy’ to ‘bringing it back in-house. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems Gothenburg, Sweden, June 2006.

  • Mitchell VL (2006) Knowledge integration and information technology project performance. MIS Quarterly 30(4), 919–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet J and Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Tansley C and Huang J (2004) Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: the importance of bridging AND bonding. British Journal of Management 15, S43–S57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppard J (2001) Bridging the gap between the IT organization and the rest of the business: plotting a route. Information Systems Journal 11, 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppard J, Lambert R and Edwards C (2000) Whose job is it anyway?: organizational information competencies for value creation. Information Systems Journal 10(4), 291–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppard J and Ward J (1999) Mind the gap’: diagnosing the relationship between the IT organization and the rest of the business. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8(2), 29–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppard J and Ward J (2005) Unlocking sustained business value from IT investments. California Management Review 48(1), 52–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross J, Vitale M and Beath C (1999) The untapped potential of IT chargeback. MIS Quarterly 23(2), 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross JW and Weill P (2002) Six IT decisions your IT people shouldn’t make. Harvard Business Review 80(11), 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) The Challenge of Complex IT Projects. Royal Academy of Engineering, London.

  • Rumelt RP (1991) How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal 12(3), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smaltz D, Sambamurthy V and Agarwal R (2006) The antecedents of CIO role effectiveness in organizations: an empirical study in the healthcare sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W (2002) Social structure of “cooperation” within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science 13, 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bon J (2005) Foundations of IT Service Management, Based on ITIL. Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward J, de Hertogh S and Viaene S (2007) Managing benefits from IS/IT investments: an empirical investigation into current practice. Paper presented at Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS), Hawaii, January.

  • Ward J and Peppard J (1996) Reconciling the IT/business relationship: a troubled marriage in need of guidance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 5(1), 37–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J and Peppard J (2002) Strategic Planning for Information Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1995) The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after. Strategic Management Journal 16, 171–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BC, Marakas GM and Brickley P (2002) From back office to board room: repositioning global IT by educating the line to lead at British American Tobacco. MIS Quarterly Executive 1(1), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems Research Centre, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Bedford, U.K.

    Joe Peppard

Authors
  1. Joe Peppard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Peppard.

Additional information

This paper is based on a keynote presentation, delivered at the Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide, Australia, December 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peppard, J. The conundrum of IT management. Eur J Inf Syst 16, 336–345 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000697

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000697

Keywords

Search

Navigation