Abstract
This paper provides a critical discussion of the ongoing concern of Information Systems (IS) academics on the status of IS as an academic discipline. The focal claim of the argument is that the status of IS as an ‘academic discipline’ is not an ontological or an epistemological question but rather a political one. In defending this claim the paper will draw on the work of Foucault, in particular his discussion on the relation between power and knowledge. The paper will conclude that the advice given by Paul (2002) and others may be appropriate but for very different reasons. It will claim that it is equally important, if not more so, to know the reasons why claims to legitimacy may succeed or not, for such claims to be effective as a political programme.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam F and Fitzgerald B (2000) The status of the IS field: historical perspective and practical orientation. Information Research 5(4), available at: http://informationr.net/ir/5-4/paper81.html
Banville C and Landry M (1989) Can the field of MIS be disciplined. Communications of the ACM 32(1), 48–60.
Benbasat I and, Zmud R (1999) Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. Management Information Systems Quarterly 23(1), 3–16.
Chand DR (1989) Some observations on information systems as an academic discipline. CIS Educator Forum 1(3), 16–18.
Clegg SR (1989) Frameworks of Power. Sage Publications Ltd, London.
Davis GB (2000) Information systems conceptual foundations: looking backward and forward. In (Basskerville R, Stage J, DeGross JI (Eds), Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology pp 61–82, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG8.2 International Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, 9–11 June, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Fitzgerald B and Adam F (1996) The future of IS: expansion or extinction?, Proceedings of the First Conference of the UK Academy for Information Systems, Cranfield University, UK, 10–12 April 1996, 15 pp.
Foucault M (1977) Truth and Power, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977 (Gordon C Ed.) Pantheon Books, New York. pp 109–133.
Keen P (1980) MIS research: reference discipline and a cumulative tradition. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Information Systems, Philadelphia McLean E (Ed.) pp 9–18.
Keen P (1991) Keynote address: relevance and rigor in information systems research. Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, in Nissen H, Klein H and Hirschheim R, (Eds), pp 27–49, Elsevier Publishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Latour B (1993) We have never been Modern. Harvester, New York.
Latour B and Woolgar S (1986 [1979]) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Nietzsche F (1967) The Will to Power. Vintage Books, New York.
Nunamaker Jr. JF, Couger JD and Davis GB (1982) Information systems curriculum recommendations for the 80s: undergraduate and graduate programs. Communications of the ACM 25(11), 781–805.
Paul R (2002) (IS)3: is information systems an intellectual subject? European Journal of Information Systems 11, 174–177.
Weber R and Wand Y (1995) On the deep structure of information systems, Information Systems Journal 5(3), 203–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Introna, L. Disciplining Information Systems: Truth and its Regimes. Eur J Inf Syst 12, 235–240 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000465
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000465