Skip to main content
Log in

Are Sexual and Reproductive Rights Only for the Rich?

  • Dialogue
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

Differentials in the exercise of rights to sexual and reproductive health based income and residence are among the most pronounced of any regularly measured health-related development indicators. Poor and rural populations are least likely to give birth under safe conditions, to translate their preferences to delay or avoid pregnancies into safe and effective action, more likely to give birth at very early and late ages when risks are higher, and more susceptible to sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted or transactional sex. Failure to redress the conditions that contribute to these disparities amounts to a violation of rights obligations and international consensus commitments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Zahr, Carla and J.Patrick Vaughan (2000) ‘Assessing the Burden of Sexual and Reproductive Ill-health: Questions regarding the use of disability-adjusted life years’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78 (5): 655–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Human Rights. United Nations (2003) Resolution, 2003/28, preamble and para 6.

  • Commission on Human Rights. United Nations (2004) ‘The Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, Report of the Special Rapporteur, Paul Hunt (Document no. E/CN.4/2004/49, 16 February 2004, Commission On Human Rights, 60th session).

  • Cook, Rebecca J., Bernard M. Dickens and Mahmoud F. Fathalla (2003) Reproductive Health and Human Rights: Integrating medicine, ethics and law Issues in Biomedical Ethics series, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gwatkin, Davidson R., Shea Rutstein, Kierstin Johnson, Eldaw Abdala Suliman, Adam Wagstaff and Amouzou Agbessi (2004) Socioeconomic Differences in Health, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank (data available also on World Bank website, Country Reports section) (forthcoming).

  • Gakidou, Emmannuela, Cecilia Vidal Margaret Hogan, Angelica Sousa and Brian Chin (2005) ‘Trends and Inequalities in Access to Reproductive Health Services in Developing Countries: Who is reaching the poor?’, paper given at Population Association of America 2005 Annual Conference, session on Maternal Health in Developing Countries.

  • National Research Council (2003) Cities Transformed: Demographic change and its implications in the developing world Panel on Urban Population Dynamics, Mark R. Montgomery, Richard Stren, Barney Cohen and Holly E. Reed (eds.), Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  • Ethelston, Sally, Amanda Bechtel, Nada Chaya, Andrew Kantner and Carolyn Gibb Vogel (2004) Progress & Promises: Trends in international assistance for reproductive health and population, Washington: Population Action International.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA (2004) Investing in People: National progress in implementing the ICPD Programme of Action 1994–2004, New York: UNFPA.

  • UNFPA (2003) Country Profiles for Population and Reproductive Health: Policy developments and indicators for 2003, Washington: Population Reference Bureau (2005 edition forthcoming).

  • United Nations (1994) ‘Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development’, Cairo, 1994 (Document no. A.CONF.171.13.).

  • United Nations (2005a) ‘In Larger Freedom: Towards development, security and human rights for all’, Report of the Secretary-General (General Assembly Document no. A/59/2005, March 2005, 59th session), New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations (2005b) ‘Report of the Secretary-General on the Flow of Financial Resources for Assisting in the Implementation of the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development’, Commission on Population and Development’, Doc. no. E/CN.9/2005/5.

  • UN Millennium Project (2005a) ‘Who's Got the Power? Transforming Health Systems for Women and Children’, Report of the Task Force on Child Health and Maternal Health UNDP: New York.

  • UN Millennium Project (2005b) Population, Reproductive Health and the Millennium Development Goals: Messages from the task force reports, New York: UNDP.

  • Vlassoff, Michael et al. (2005) ‘Costs and Benefits of Providing Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: A review’, Occasional Report, No. 11, New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute.

  • WHO (2002) ‘Maternal Mortality in 2000: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA’, Geneva: WHO.

  • WHO (2004) ‘PRSPs Their Significance for Health: Second synthesis report’, Document no. WHO/HDP/PRSP/04.1, World Health Organization: Geneva.

  • Wirth, Meg, Deborah Balk, Adam Storeygard, Emma Sacks, Enrique Delamonica and Alberto Minujin (2004) ‘Setting the Stage for Equity-sensitive Monitoring of the Health MDGs’, unpublished background paper for Child and Maternal Health Task Force, New York: UN Millennium Project.

  • World Health Assembly (2005) ‘Working Towards Universal Coverage of Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Interventions’, Resolution WHA 58.31, 25 May 2005, Geneva.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Illustrates how failure to provide poor women with SHRH is a violation of their rights

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernstein, S. Are Sexual and Reproductive Rights Only for the Rich?. Development 48, 99–105 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100185

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100185

Keywords

Navigation