Abstract
Starting with a questionable reputation, Chiquita has succeeded to embark on an impressive improvement process that was rewarded with certification of their banana plantations by the Rainforest Alliance. Unfortunately, when Chiquita proudly made their achievements public in Switzerland in the fall of 2005, the public was incredulous and NGOs wrote a joint letter of complaint. What went wrong? This article uses the case of Chiquita to emphasize the distinction between rule-based Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and principle-based CSR. Additionally, it demonstrates the importance of continuous communication during a transformation of identity and provides pointers to avoid the so-called authenticity gap.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fombrum, C.J. and van Riel, C.B.M. (2004) Fame & Fortune, How Successful Companies Build Winning Positions, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2006) ‘The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility', Harvard Business Review, Reprint R0612D, pp. 1–15.
Werre, M. (2003) ‘Implement corporate social responsibility, the Chiquita case', Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 247–260.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wicki, S., van der Kaaij, J. Is it True Love Between the Octopus and the Frog? How to Avoid the Authenticity Gap. Corp Reputation Rev 10, 312–318 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550061
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550061