Skip to main content
Log in

United Kingdom: Best and Worst Corporate Reputations — Nominations by the General Public

  • Paper
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How are corporate reputations judged in the eyes of the general public? Until recently this question has not been seriously addressed in the academic literature. Most of the best-known surveys or ratings of corporations, such as the Fortune/Management Today rankings, have been based on the views of chief executives, analysts or journalists, rather than those of the general public. But members of the general public will also have views about the reputations of companies and, to the extent that they act on the basis of those views, can significantly affect the fortunes of the businesses concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacMillan, K., Money, K. & Downing, S. United Kingdom: Best and Worst Corporate Reputations — Nominations by the General Public. Corp Reputation Rev 4, 374–384 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540158

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540158

Keywords

Navigation